This book offers a legal analysis of sharing of passenger data from the EU to the US in light of the EU legal framework protecting individualsâ privacy and personal data. It aims to situate this analysis with respect to the ever-growing policies of Global North countries to introduce pre-screening procedures in border control proceedings for the purpose of the fight against terrorism. By tracing the literature on the (in)securitisation and as such depoliticization of border controls through technology-led interventions, it explores the multiplicity of purposes that passenger data sharing entail and considers the question on the limitability of fundamental rights depending on its purpose.
Elif Mendos KuÅkonmaz is a lecturer at the School of Law of University of Portsmouth. She holds a doctorate from QMUL, having previously read law at QMUL and Istanbul University.
Acknowledgements Abbreviations
Introduction
1 Putting PNR Data into Context Privacy and Personal Data Protection in the EU and in the US
Introduction
1âMapping Privacy and Protection of Personal Data
â1.1âFaçades of Privacy
â1.2âTracing Privacy from Antiquity to Modernity in the Doctrine
â1.3âProtection of Personal Data:Â Intersection of Technology and Information
2âPrivacy and Personal Data Protection Regimes in the EU and in the US
â2.1âPrivacy and Protection of Personal Data in the EU
ââ2.1.1âProtections under the ECHR
âââ2.1.1.1âPrivacy and the ECHR
âââ2.1.1.2âPersonal Data Protection and the ECHR
ââ2.1.2âProtections under the Charter
âââ2.1.2.1âPrivacy and the Charter
âââ2.1.2.2âPersonal Data Protection and the Charter
ââââ2.1.2.2.1âThe Fundamental Right to Data Protection
ââââ2.1.2.2.2âWhat Qualifies as an Interference with the Fundamental Right of Data Protection?
ââ2.2âPrivacy and Protection of Personal Data in the US
âââ2.2.1âPrivacy Protection under the Fourth Amendment
âââ2.2.2âPrivacy Protection under Federal Statutes
Conclusion
2 Right to Privacy and Right to Protection of Personal Data under the ECHR and the Charter
Introduction
1âJudicial Assessment by the European Court of Human Rights
â1.1âInterferences by Measures to Counter Terrorism and Serious Crime
ââ1.1.1âInterception of Electronic Communications
âââ1.1.1.1âInterception of Electronic Communications for National Security Purposes
âââ1.1.1.2âInterception of Electronic Communications in the Context of Prevention and Investigations of Crimes
ââ1.1.2âInformation Collection
âââ1.1.2.1âInformation Collection for National Security Purposes
âââ1.1.2.2âInformation Collection in the Context of Prevention and Investigations of Crimes
ââ1.1.3âInformation Transfer
â1.2âCompatibility with the Right to Privacy
ââ1.2.1âIn Accordance with the Law
âââ1.2.1.1âForeseeability Requirement for the Telecommunications Interception in the Context of Criminal Investigations
âââ1.2.1.2âForeseeability Requirement for the Telecommunications Interception for the Interests of National Security
ââââ1.2.1.2.1âForeseeability in Relation to the Nature of Offences
ââââ1.2.1.2.2âForeseeability in Relation to the Target Group
ââââ1.2.1.2.3âForeseeability in Relation to the Procedural Safeguards
âââ1.2.1.3âForeseeability Requirement for Information Collection
âââ1.2.2âLegitimate Aim
âââ1.2.3âRequirement of Being Necessary in a Democratic Society
âââ1.2.3.1âThe âNecessityâ Test for Telecommunications Interception
âââ1.2.3.2âThe âNecessityâ Test for Information Collection
âââ1.2.3.3âThe âNecessityâ Test for Information Transfer
2âJudicial Assessment of the Court of Justice of the European Union
â2.1âInterferences by Measures to Counter Terrorism and Serious Crime
â2.2âNature of the Interference
â2.3âLimitations under the Charter
ââ2.3.1âProvided for by Law
ââ2.3.2âThe Respect of the Essence of the Rights
ââ2.3.3âObjective of General Interest
âââ2.3.4âProportionality in View of the Objective
âââ2.3.4.1âThe Criterion of Appropriateness
âââ2.3.4.2âThe Criterion of Necessity
âââ2.3.4.3âProportionality in the Narrower Sense
ââââ2.3.4.3.1âRetention of Personal Data
ââââ2.3.4.3.2âAccess to Personal Data
ââââ2.3.4.3.3âUse of Personal Data
ââââ2.3.4.3.4âTransfer of Personal Data
ââââ2.3.4.4âProportionality with Respect to Data Security
ââââ2.3.4.5âProportionality with Respect to the Rights of Individuals
ââââ2.3.4.6âProportionality with Respect to the Oversight Mechanism
Conclusion
3 Birth of PNR Data and the EUâUS PNR Agreement
Introduction
1âGenesis of PNR Data
2âPNR Data and Counter-Terrorism:Â The History behind the EUâUS PNR Agreement
3âThe EUâUS PNR Agreement
â3.1âLegal Basis of the EUâUS PNR Agreement
â3.2âTerms of the EUâUS PNR Agreement
ââ3.2.1âScope of the EUâUS PNR Agreement
ââ3.2.2âPurpose of the EUâUS PNR Agreement
ââ3.2.3âPNR Data Transfers under the EU-US PNR Agreement
ââââ3.2.3.1âMethod of Transfer
ââââ3.2.3.2âCategories of pnr Data to be Transferred
ââââ3.2.3.3âSensitive Data
ââ3.2.4âRetention Period
ââ3.2.5âRecipients of PNR Data
ââ3.2.6âData Security
ââ3.2.7âRights of Individuals
âââ3.2.7.1âAccess
âââ3.2.7.2âRectification
âââ3.2.7.3âRedress
âââ3.2.7.4âInformation
ââ3.2.8âOversight Mechanism
ââ3.2.9âReview of the EUâUS PNR Agreement
âConclusion
4 From Theory to Practice What Is the Added Value of PNR Data? Introduction
1âThe Main Database for PNR Data:Â Automated Targeting System
â1.1âAutomated Targeting System and Data-Processing Techniques ââ1.1.1âAn Overview of the Types of Data-Processing Techniques
ââ1.1.2âAutomated Targeting System and Data-Processing Techniques
â1.2âAutomated Targeting System Data Sources 2âSystem under which PNR Data Are Used
â2.1âProcessing of the PNR Data ââ2.1.1âComparison
ââ2.1.2âRisk Assessment
â2.2âUsers of the System â2.3âAccess to PNR Data â2.4âSharing PNR Data with Other US Agencies â2.5âSharing PNR Data Internationally
3âExpertise of Automated Targeting System Users
âConclusion
5 Evaluation of the EU-US PNR Agreement with the European and EU Legal Framework for Privacy and Personal Data Protection Introduction
1âEvaluation of the PNR Agreement with the Right to Privacy and Personal Data Protection
â1.1âAttracting the Protection of the Right to Privacy and Data Protection â1.2âNature of the Interference by the pnr Agreement 2âJustification of the Interference by the PNR Agreement
â2.1âThe Legal Ground
â2.2âThe Respect of Essence of the Rights
â2.3âObjective of General Interest
â2.4âProportionality in View of the Objective 174 ââ2.4.1âAppropriateness of the pnr Agreement with Respect to Counter-Terrorism
ââ2.4.2âNecessity of the PNR Agreement with Respect to Counter-Terrorism
ââ2.4.3âProportionality in the Narrower Sense
âââ2.4.3.1âPurposes of PNR Data Processing
âââ2.4.3.2âRules on the Transfer of PNR Data
ââââ2.4.3.2.1âMethod of Transfer
ââââ2.4.3.2.2âCategories of PNR Data to be Transferred
âââ2.4.3.3âRules on the Use of PNR Data
ââââ2.4.3.3.1âReal-Time Use of pnr Data upon Arrival
ââââ2.4.3.3.2âHistorical Use of pnr Data:Â From Arrival until After Departure
ââââ2.4.3.4âRules on the Retention of pnr Data
ââââ2.4.3.5âRules on Access to PNR Data
ââââ2.4.3.6âOnward Transfer of PNR Data
ââââ2.4.4âProportionality with Respect to Rules on Data Security
âââ2.4.5âProportionality with Respect to Rights of Individuals
âââ2.4.6âProportionality with Respect to Oversight Mechanism
âConclusion
6 The Border A Crossroads for Terrorists and Criminals? Introduction
1âThe Border as the Reach of Criminal Jurisdiction
â1.1âSubstantive Cross-Border Crimes:Â Borrowing a Criminology Lexicon ââ1.1.1âEU Law and Cross-Border Crimes
ââ1.1.2âUS Law and Cross-Border Crimes
ââ1.1.3âConclusive Remarks on Cross-Border Crimes
â1.2âTerrorism:Â Co-operation against an Unidentified Legal Phenomenon â1.2.1âTerrorism under EU Law
â1.2.2âTerrorism under US Law
â1.2.3âConclusive Remarks on the Definition of Terrorism
â1.3âEnforcement against Cross-Border Criminality and Terrorism:Â EUâUS Mutual Legal Assistance Agreement 2âThe Border as the Making of States and Citizens
â2.1âContainment of Cross-Border Crimes and Terrorism through Border Controls ââ2.1.1âEU Border Control:Â Wrapping Free Movement around Security Interests
ââ2.1.2âUS Border Control:Â The Coming of Homeland Security
ââ2.1.3âConclusive Remarks on Border Controls and Terrorism
â2.2âSecuring Borders through Virtual Identities Conclusion
Conclusion 1âThe EU-US PNR Agreement:Â The Story of a Cooperation Out of a Conflict of Laws
2âIn Search of a Suspicion Requirement
3âSubstantive Assessment of the EU-US PNR Agreement
4âFurther Questions on the EU-US PNR Agreement as Part of Border Management
Bibliography
Index
All interested in privacy and data protection rights in the context of counter-terrorism, and anyone concerned with border surveillance and data transfers for counter-terrorism.