In Rescuing Autonomy from Kant, James Furner argues that Marxismâs relation to Kantâs ethics is not one of irrelevance, complementarity or incompatibility, but critique. Although Kantâs formulas of the categorical imperative presuppose a belief in God that Kant cannot motivate, the value of autonomy can instead be grounded by appeal to an antinomy in capitalismâs basic structure, and this commits us to socialism.
James Furner, Ph.D. (2008, University of Sussex), is a Lecturer in Philosophy at the Universtiy of Sussex, U.K., and author of Marx on Capitalism: the Interaction-Recognition-Antinomy Thesis (Haymarket, 2019).
âRescuing Autonomy from Kant provides a sophisticated and persuasive critical account of Kantâs moral philosophy that paves the way for a Marxist ethics which unites the value of autonomy with the value of human community. The book will be of particular interest to readers curious to see how a critique of Kantâs moral theory undertaken from a socialist standpoint does not require a complete rejection of this theory. Instead, key elements of it can be incorporated into an alternative ethical theory that demonstrates the unethical nature of capitalism.â
â David James, Reader in Philosophy, University of Warwick
âJames Furnerâs book is an important addition to thought about the relationship between normative Marxism and Kantian autonomy. Of particular interest, it articulates and defends a novel way to understand the respect in which freedom, universalizability, and reason ground the critique of capitalism. Combining close readings of classic texts and careful consideration of secondary literature with constructive philosophy, this book will broaden the horizons of intellectual historians, normative ethicists, and political theorists.â
â Thaddeus Metz, Professor of Philosophy, University of Pretoria
Acknowledgements References and Abbreviations
Introduction
Part I Three Views of Marxismâs Relation to Kantâs Ethics
Introduction to Part I
1 Against the Irrelevance View
â1âThe Instrumental Reasons Argument
â2âThe False Claims Argument
â3âThe Ideology Argument
â4âThe Class Interests Argument
â5âSummary
2 Against the Complementarity View, Part 1: Socialist Strategy
â1âThe Complementarity View: Stammler, Staudinger, Vorländer
â2âAn Objection to the Complementarity View
â3âThe Deficient Self-Understanding Claim: A Critique
3 Against the Complementarity View, Part 2: Can Kantâs Formula of the End in Itself Condemn Capitalism?
â1âFEI-Based Arguments against Capitalism
â2âKantâs Never Merely as a Means Principle
â3âApplying FEI: Some General Considerations
â4âApplying FEI beyond Kant
â5âEvaluation of the Arguments
â6âFEI and General Injustice
â7âConclusion
4 Against the Incompatibility View
â1âTwo Components of Human Freedom
â2âMarx on Human Freedom
â3âThe True Realm of Freedom and the Realm of Necessity
â4âThe Link to Autonomy
â5âMarx on the Autonomy of a Human Community
â6âMarxâs Commitment to a Critique of Kantâs Ethics
â7âSummary
Part II A Critique of Kantâs Ethics
Introduction to Part II
5 Kantâs Contradiction in Conception Test
â1âThe Basic Features of the Causal-Teleological Version of LCI
â2âFurther Features of a Causal-Teleological Version of LCI
â3âThe Suicide Maxim
â4âThe False Promising Maxim
â5âSummary
6 Kantâs Contradiction in the Will Test
â1âAssessment Criteria
â2âAssessing the Existing Interpretations
â3âThe Extravagant Imperfect Nature Interpretation
â4âFormulating the Groundworkâs Two Maxims
â5âThe Maxim of Neglecting Natural Gifts
â6âThe Maxim of Refusing to Help
â7âSummary
7 The Principle of Suitability Interpretation of Kantâs Formula of the Law of Nature
â1âThe Contradiction in Conception Test
â2âThe Contradiction in the Will Test
8 Kantâs Argument for the Formula of the End in Itself
â1âThe Structure of Kantâs Argument for FEI
â2âSteps 1â3
â3âStep 4: the Logical Pluralism Version of Kantâs Regressive Argument
â4âAdvantages of the Logical Pluralism Version of Kantâs Regressive Argument
â5âHumanity, Personality and a Belief in the Existence of God
9 Kantâs Arguments for a Belief in the Existence of God
â1âKantâs Concept of the Highest Good
â2âThe Argument from the Highest Good
â3âWoodâs Version of the Argument from the Highest Good
â4âThe Objection from Moral Happiness
â5âThe Physicoteleological Argument
â6âConclusion
Part III Founding a Post-Kantian Ethics
Introduction to Part III
10 A Marxist Argument for Autonomy
â1âRelativising Practical Reason
â2âAn Argumentative Strategy
â3âThe Need for a Duty to the Whole
â4âThe General Features of a Foundational Argument
â5âA Lesson from Millâs âProofâ
â6âThe Distinctive Features of a Marxist Foundational Argument
â7âA Simple Account of Capitalismâs Basic Structure
â8âExplaining the Premises
â9âThe Rights-Antinomy
â10âResolving the Rights-Antinomy
â11âThe System Universalisability Principle of Justice
â12âThe Autonomy of a Human Community
â13âSummary
â14âThe Justification of Socialist Strategy
â15âConclusion
Bibliography Index
Anyone interested in Kant, post-Kantian philosophy, Marx and Marxism, or the ethics of socialism.