The Aeolic dialects of Ancient Greek (Lesbian, Thessalian, and Boeotian) are characterised by a small bundle of commonly shared innovations, yet at the same time they exhibit remarkable linguistic diversity. While traditionally classified together in modern scholarship since the nineteenth century, in recent decades doubt has been cast on whether they form a coherent dialectal subgroup of Ancient Greek. In this monograph Matthew Scarborough outlines the history of problem of Aeolic classification from antiquity to the present day, collects and analyses the primary evidence for the linguistic innovations that unite and divide the group, and contributes an innovative new statistical methodology for evaluating highly contested genetic subgroupings in dialectology, ultimately arguing in support of the traditional classification.
Matthew Scarborough, Ph.D. (2017), University of Cambridge, is currently a postdoctoral researcher in the Department of Nordic Studies and Linguistics at the University of Copenhagen. His research focuses on the linguistic prehistory of Greek with special emphasis on the comparative study of the Ancient Greek dialects, Indo-European etymology and lexicography, and linguistic phylogenetics.
Preface Acknowledgements List of Figures List of Tables Abbreviation of Corpora and Reference Works Grammatical and Linguistic Abbreviations Epigraphic and Papyrological Abbreviations Note on the Accentuation of Dialect Forms A Note on the Transcription of Ancient and Modern Greek Proper Names
1 The Problem of Aeolic in Ancient Greek Dialectology
â1âIntroduction
â2âThe Notion of Aeolic in Antiquity
â3â19th Century Debates: Ahrens, Meister, and Hoffmann
â4âTwentieth Century Developments
â5âThe Twenty-First Century: Problems and Methods, Old and New
â6âResolving the Impasse: The Aims and Structure of This Work
2 Methodological Preliminaries
â1âIntroduction
â2âMethodological Considerations in the Selection of Isoglosses
â3âSources and Methodological Issues
â4âThe Data Collection for This Study
â5âConcluding Remarks
3 The Core Aeolic Isoglosses
â1âIntroduction
â2âThe Position of Mycenaean in Classification and Relative Chronology
â3âSome Preliminary Assumptions: Exclusion of Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Greek Synapomorphic Characters
â4âCommon Innovations from Proto-Greek
â5âConclusions
4 The Peripheral Aeolic Isoglosses
â1âIntroduction
â2âIsoglosses Shared by Two of Three Dialects
â3âIsoglosses Shared with Neighbouring Dialects
â4âConclusions
5 A Probability-Based Clade Test for Aeolic
â1âIntroduction
â2âThe Probabilistic Method
â3âEvaluation: Application of the Clade Test to the Aeolic Data
â4âDiscussion of Results and Some Relative Chronologies
â5âConclusions
Concluding Remarks
Appendix 1: Catalogue of Epigraphic References Appendix 2: Aeolic Dialectal Isogloss Tables Bibliography Index
Classical Philologists, Dialectologists, Historical Linguists, Specialists in Greek Epigraphy, Historians of Classical Greece, Aegean Prehistorians, Specialists in the linguistic history of Greek, Indo-European Historical and Comparative Linguists (Subject Areas: Classical Greek and Roman Studies, Historical Linguistics)