In Intention in Talmudic Law: Between Thought and Deed, Shana Strauch Schick offers the first comprehensive history of intention in classical Jewish law (1st-6th centuries CE). Through close readings of rabbinic texts and explorations of contemporaneous legal-religious traditions, Strauch Schick constructs an intellectual history that reveals remarkable consistency within the rulings of particular sages, locales, and schools of thought. The book carefully traces developments across generations and among groups of rabbis, uncovering competing lineages of evolving legal and religious thought, and demonstrating how intention gradually became a nuanced, differentially applied concept across a wide array of legal realms.
Shana Strauch Schick is a Leon Charney fellow at Yeshiva Universityâs Center for Israel Studies and teaches in the United States and Israel. Her recent articles have appeared in AJS Review and Nashim. She received her Ph.D. in 2011 from Yeshiva University.
"Strauch Schick demonstrates profound expertise in textual criticism and manuscript traditions, and using these skills, offers a positivist reconstruction of the development of rabbinic concepts of intention. Strauch Schickâs work is characterized by her extremely careful readings of complicated legal texts. It is worth repeating this last point â these rabbinic texts are complicated; understanding them requires profound experience with rabbinic thinking as well as deep familiarity with modern legal categories. In this short but dense book, Strauch Schick expertly analyzes these rabbinic texts and brings legal theory to bear in understanding what the rabbis are doing."
- Sara Ronis, in Hebrew Studies 63 (2022).
"Schickâs work is an important contribution to the intellectual history of the talmudic period no less than to the study of the talmudic text itself. Her research is not only rich in demonstrating the value of redaction criticism for identifying the various strata of material in a text that has undergone a complicated editorial process, but it is successful in arranging those strata to tell a coherent story of legal and literary development within the edifice of rabbinic literature. By considering the broader intellectual contexts in which this development took place, she is able to make a case for influence whichâwhile more speculative than demonstrativeâis nonetheless compelling, shedding explanatory light on the rise of legal intention in the Babylonian Talmud."
- Phillip I. Lieberman, in Journal for the Study of Judaism 54 (2023).
"This very question is the subject of the technical but fascinating book, Intention in Talmudic Law by Shana Strauch Schick. (...) the Talmud rarely presents theories and general rules, preferring instead to teach through sample cases, debates, and never-ending argumentation. This results in a sprawling network of many opposing opinions and interpretations scattered over multiple works, time periods, and contexts. Yet, Schick successfully manages to organize this mass of material and chart the development of halakha on this topic from Tannaitic, to early Amoraic, to late Amoraic understandings, while also carefully distinguishing between the Sages in Israel from those in Babylonia."
- Richard Hidary, in Tradition 55:1 (2023).
"What the present work contributes is greater sensitivity to historical and cultural issues: we learn how various, mainly Babylonian, Amoraim extended the concept of intention, and we enquire whether and to what extent teachings of the Babylonian Amoraim relate to developments in Roman law, Sasanian law and other facets of contemporary culture. (...) this is a well-structured and clearly argued work which draws on the best of modern scholarship not only in its analysis of foundational rabbinic texts but also in assessing the development of rabbinic law within the context of the Greco-Roman and Iranian worlds."
- Norman Solomon, in Journal of Jewish Studies vol. LXXIII, No. 2 (2022).
Preface
Introduction
1âSummary of Findings
2âPrevious Scholarship and Methodology
3âMethodological Concerns
4âHistorical Context of the Bavli:Â Hellenistic, Christian, Zoroastrian
5âOutline of Chapters
6âA Note on Gender Pronouns
1âFrom Tannaitic to Early Amoraic Law: Contrasting Systems of Tort Law in the Yerushalmi and Bavli
1âOverview of Tort Law in Tannaitic Sources
2âM. Bava Qama 2:6:Â âA Person Is Always Forewarnedâ
â2.1âYerushalmi:Â R. Isaac on the Necessity of Fault
â2.2âBavli:Â Strict Liability
3âM. Bava Qama. 3:1:Â Exemption for Accidental Damages
â3.1âYerushalmi - Rav, Samuel and R. Elâazar: Liability Determined by Fault
â3.2âBavli - Rav, Samuel and R. Yohanan: Strict Liability
â3.3âBavli and Yerushalmi:Â Identical Traditions, Divergent Rulings
4âContextualizing Tort Liability in the Yerushalmi
5âContextualizing Tort Liability in the Bavli
2âThe Third Generation of Babylonian Amoraim: A Period of Transition
1âOverview:Â The Emergence of Competing Schools of Thought in Pumbedita and Mahoza
2âPumbedita:Â Negligence and Deliberate Action in the Rulings of Rabbah
â2.1âB. Bava Qama 26b-27a:Â Strict Liability and Negligence
â2.2âB. Bava Qama 56a:Â Liability for Negligence
â2.3âB. Bava Qama 28b-29b:Â Intent to Act
3âMahoza:Â Negligence and Purposeful Action
â3.1âR. Nahman:Â Purpose Defines the Prohibition
â3.2âMitasseq and Melakhah She- eina Tzerikha Le-gufa:Â Exemptions in the Laws of Shabbat
â3.3âR. Hisda:Â Intention in the Fulfillment of Religious Precepts
4âSummary
3âThe Fourth Generation of Babylonian Amoraim: A Period of Innovation
1âOverview
2âPumbedita:Â Abaye
â2.1âChallenge to Rabbahâs Strict Liability
â2.2âChallenges Regarding the Laws of the Sabbath
3âMahoza:Â Rava
â3.1âTort Law
ââ3.1.1âB. Bava Qama 27b:Â Rights of Pedestrians
ââ3.1.2âB. Bava Metzia 96b:Â Borrowerâs Rights
ââ3.1.3âB. Bava Metzia 83a:Â Borrowerâs Oath
ââ3.1.4âB. Bava Qama 62a:Â Guarding a Golden Dinar
â3.2âReligious Law:Â Intention in the Laws of Sabbath
4âRava in Contrast to Abaye in Religious Law
â4.1âB. Sanhedrin 61b:Â Idol Worship Out of Love and Fear
â4.2âB. Sanhedrin 74a-b:Â Martyrdom
â4.3âB. Shabbat 72b-73a:Â Davar She-ein Mitkavvein
â4.4âB. Menahot 64a:Â Action versus Intention
5âRavaâs Emphasis on Intention:Â Precedents and Parallels
â5.1âLand of Israel Precedents
â5.2âParallels in Zoroastrian Literature
6âRavaâs Jurisprudence and Aristotelian Corrective Justice
â6.1âAristotle on Corrective Justice
â6.2âParallels with Rava
â6.3âReading Aristotle in Mahoza?
4âMitzvot Ein Tzerikhot Kavvanah: Divorcing Ritual Performance from Intention
1âOverview: A Radical Change in Ritualâ¯Law
2âThe Development of Mitzvot Ein Tzerikhot Kavvanah
â2.1âThe Mishnaic View: Shema, Shofar, Megillah
â2.2âEarly Amoraic Views: Accidental Immersion
â2.3âRavaâs View
3âRavaâs Ruling in Context
â3.1âThe Bavli Context: Intent in Tort Law and Religious Violations
â3.2âCultural Context: Zoroastrian and Monastic Texts
4âSummary
5âViews in the Bavli after Rava
1âOverview:Â The Late Amoraim and the Bavliâs Redactors
2âRavaâs Students
â2.1âContinuity
â2.2âInnovation: Manslaughter
3âThe Redactors
â3.1âIntent to Derive Benefit/Pleasure: Davar She-ein Mitkavvein and Hanaâat Atzmo
4âSummary
Conclusion: Intentionality in Rabbinic Law in Historical and Cultural Perspective
1âTransitions from Subjective to Objective Standards in Legal Thought
2âThe âEvolutionâ of Legal Systems
3âIntention and the Self
4âIntention, Argumentation, and Conceptualization
Bibliography Index
This book would be of interest to academics in the fields of Talmud, Jewish law and thought, and to laypeople interested in Talmud study and the development of rabbinic law.