In Contractual Renegotiations and International Investment Arbitration, Aikaterini Florou explores the sensitive issues of renegotiating state contracts and the relationship between those contracts and the overarching international investment treaties. By introducing novel insights from economics, the author deconstructs the contract-treaty interaction, demonstrating that it is not only treaties that impact the underlying contracts, but also that those contracts have an effect on the way the open-textured treaty standards are interpreted. The originality of the argument is combined with an innovative interpretative methodology based on relational contract theory and transaction cost economics. Departing from the traditional emphasis of international lawyers on the text of investment contracts, Florou shows instead that such contracts are first and foremost âeconomic animalsâ and the theory of obsolescing bargaining does not paint a full picture of the contract-treaty interaction.
Aikaterini Florou obtained her PhD from Sciences Po Law School in 2017. She is currently a visiting scholar and visiting lecturer at Bologna Law School. Previously, she worked for several years as a legal and policy officer with the European Commission in the fields of international energy and investment law.
Contractual Renegotiations and International Investment Arbitration is a strong addition to the burgeoning literature on international law and economics. The book offers a fresh perspective in the analysis of international investment law that was long overdue! The key innovation the book offers is a novel analytical framework that marries relational contract theory with transaction cost economics. Dr Florouâs work shows a deep understanding of the economics of investor-state contracts under the lens of relational contract theory. It then combines this analysis with the examination of the role of law in addressing international investor-state economic disputes broadening tour reading of the Treaties beyond the positivist approach. The combined analysis opens up new interpretation possibilities of the Treaties which could be useful in a number of investor-state disputes. Academics, investment arbitration practitioners and post-graduate students with an interest in International arbitration will find this book an enlightening read!
- Professor Emilios Avgouleas (https://www.law.ed.ac.uk/people/professor-emilios-avgouleas)
The book is a timely and innovative addition to the scholarship on international investment law and an interesting perspective from which to observe the changing approach to investment protection. The interactions with concession agreements in investment protection are increasingly important as an element of energy law. This subject matter is well-chosen for its ability to reveal the instability in the system; there are significant changes as a result of laws on renewable energy and changing environmental regulations. However, it also represents an essential element of the public interest element to foreign investments.
Emily Sipiorski, Tilburg School of Law, Department of Public Law and Governance, published in "Transnational Dispute Management" (2021)
âIntroduction â The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly? â1 Renegotiating in the Shadow of Investment Treaties: the Inherent Dilemma between Commitment and Flexibility
â2 Defining Public-Private Partnerships in Infrastructure: a Complex Balance between Conflicting Interests
â3 The Need for the Renegotiation and Adaptation of Concession Contracts
â4 Contractual Renegotiations and the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard
â4.1 Presentation of the Research Question
â4.2 Overview of the Literature and Novelty of the Argument
â4.3 Analytical Framework
â4.4 Methodology
â1 Concession Contracts as Relational Contracts â1 Why the Nature of Concession Contracts Matters
â2 The Three-Way Classification of Contracts
â2.1 Classification of Contracts and Legal Realism
â2.1.1 Classical Contracts
â2.1.2 Neoclassical Contracts
â2.1.3 Relational Contracts
â3 The Characteristics and the Governance of Relational Contracts
â3.1 Characteristics
â3.2 Governance and Judicial Strategies
â3.2.1 The Role of the Law in the Governance of Relational Contracts
â3.2.2 The Role of the Courts in the Governance of Relational Contracts
â4 Concession Contracts as Relational Contracts
â4.1 Relational Contract as the New Public Contracting
â4.2 The Tension between the Stability and the Adaptability of Concession Contracts
â4.3 Empirical Evidence of the Relational Character of Concession Contracts
â5 Concluding Remarks: the Need for an International Law Response to Renegotiation
â2 The Relationship between Concession Contracts and Investment Treaties â1 The Impact of International Investment Treaties on Investment Contracts
â2 The Relationship between Contract Claims and Treaty Claims
â2.1 The Blurred Distinction and the VivendiI Case
â2.2 Umbrella Clauses
â2.3 The Different Interpretations of the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard and the Doctrine of Legitimate Expectations
â3 The Use of the UNIDROIT Principles in International Dispute Resolution
â3.1 The Application of the UNIDROIT Principles in International Arbitration
â3.2 The Relevance of the UNIDROIT Principles in Investor-State Dispute Settlement
â3.2.1 The UNIDROIT Principles as General Principles of International Law
â3.2.2 The Application of the UNIDROIT Principles in Investment-Treaty Arbitration
â3.2.3 Contractual Renegotiations, Treaty Disputes, and the UNIDROIT Principles on Hardship
â3.2.4 The Case Law on Hardship in Investment-Treaty Arbitrations
â4 Concluding Remarks
â3 Case Law Review â1 The Argentine Cases
â1.1 EDF International S.A., Saur International S.A. and Leon Participaciones Argentinas S.A. v. Argentina
â1.2 Enron Corporation Ponderosa L.P. v. Argentina
â1.3 LG&E v. Argentina
â1.4 CMS v. Argentina
â1.5 Sempra Energy International v. Argentina
â1.6 Siemens A.G. v. Argentina
â1.7 BG Group P.L.C. v. Argentina
â1.8 Total S.A. v. Argentina
â1.9 National Grid P.L.C. v. Argentina
â1.10 Hochtief AG v. Argentina
â1.11 Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A., and Vivendi Universal S.A. v. Argentina
â1.12 El Paso Energy International Company v. Argentina
â1.13 Azurix Corp. v. Argentina
â2 Other Renegotiation Cases
â2.1 Biwater Gauff Ltd. v. Tanzania
â2.2 Fraport AG Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide v. the Philippines
âConclusions
âAppendix: Categorization of ISDS Cases along the Contract-Theory Interpretative Spectrum
âBibliography âCase Law Index âSubject Index
Arbitrators and all other practitioners of international investment arbitration, as well as academics in the fields of international investment law and economic contract theory.