Unlike contemporary literary-linguistic configurations of genre, current methodologies for the study of the Gospel genre are designed only to target genre similarities not genre differences. This basic oversight results in the convoluted discussion we witness in Lukan genre study today. Each recent treatment of the genre of Luke-Acts represents a distinct effort to draw parallels between Luke-Acts and a specific (or multiple) literary tradition(s). These studies all underestimate the role of literary divergence in genre analysis, leveraging muchâif not, allâof their case on literary proximity. This monograph will show how attention to literary divergence from a number of angles may bring resolution to the increasingly complex discussions of the genre(s) of Luke-Acts.
Andrew W. Pitts, Ph.D. (McMaster Divinity College), has authored numerous peer-reviewed journal articles and chapters in multi-authored works. He is the co-editor of The Language and Literature of the New Testament (Brill) and Christian Origins and Greco-Roman Culture (Brill).
Preface List of Tables and Figures Abbreviations
1 Genre and Method in Luke-Acts Research
â1âThe Origins of a Consensus
â2âWhat Went Wrong?
â3âWhat is the Solution? âNewâ Genre Studies as a Way Forward
â4âGenre Agnation and the âNewâ Genre Studies
â5âTypological Agnation Analysis: Assessing Genre Differences
â6âTopological Analysis: Proximating Genre Likeness
â7âConceptions of History and Biography in Antiquity
â8âEvolutionary Topology and Genre Proximity
â9âGenre Elasticity and Blurring
â10âTypological Analysis of Greek Historical Genres
â11âFeature Clines and Genre Analysis: a Methodological Outline
â12âLinguistic Hierarchy, Macrostructural Analysis, and Macrogenre
â13âConclusions
2 Identifying Greek History and Biography
â1âWhat is a âRepresentativeâ Corpus and Why is it Important?
â2âToward a Representative Corpus of the Greek History Genre
â3âToward a Representative Corpus of the Î²Î¯Î¿Ï Genre
â4âCorpus Linguistics, Gospel Studies, and Richard Burridge
â5âConclusions and Implications
3 Topical Focus and Participant Identification
â1âTopical Focus: Activity vs. Entity
â2âParticipant Identification: Generic vs. Individualized
â3âConclusions
4 Frames I: Initiations and Commencements
â1âInitiation: Panoramic vs. Focalized
â2âCommencement: Event- vs. Participant-Driven
â3âConclusions
5 Frames II: Self-Identification and Genealogies
â1âSelf-Identification: Biographical vs. Nonbiographical
â2âGenealogies: Staged vs. Embedded
â3âConclusions
6 Time Management and Authentication Strategies
â1âTime Management: Episodic Time vs. Field Time
â2âAuthentication Strategy: Bounded vs. Unbounded
â3âConclusions
7 The Genre of Luke-Acts
â1âThe Enigma
â2âBringing Lukan Genre Studies Up-to-Date
â3âAgnating the Greek History and the βίοÏ
â4âWhat Genre is Luke-Acts? Micro and Macrogenre Reconsidered
â5âThe Literary Unity of Luke-Acts
â6âConclusion
Bibliography
âPrimary Sources and Critical Editions
âSecondary Sources
Index
All interested in the study of Luke-Acts, Greek history, Greek biography and Greco-Roman literary culture.