This article argues the position that the symbolic sense of community is a product of action by associations and larger community-based organizations. It draws on a theory from urban sociology called âthe community of limited liability.â In the past this theory, first articulated by Morris Janowitz, has mostly been used to argue that residents living in a local neighborhood feel a sense of identification with that area to the extent that the symbolism of that neighborhood has been developed. This article extends Janowitzâs theory to apply to local associations and their efforts to create activities, movements, and products that encourage residents to expand their sense of symbolic attachment to a place. We argue that this organizational method has long been used by local associations but it has not been recognized as an organizational theory. Because associations have used this approach over time, communities have a historical legacy of organizing and symbol creating efforts by many local associations. Over time they have competed, collaborated, and together developed a collective vision of place. They also have created a local interorganizational field and this field of interacting associations and organizations is dense with what we call associational social capital. Not all communities have this history of associational activity and associational social capital. Where it does exist, the field becomes an institutionalized feature of the community. This is what we mean by an institutional theory of community.
Carl Milofsky, PhD, University of California at Berkeley, is currently Professor of Sociology at Bucknell University. He has authored three books and edited three others focusing on associations, community organizations, and small nonprofit agencies. He was Editor-in-Chief of the Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly and is currently an Editor of the Voluntary Sector Review.
"The review provided by Milofsky is very comprehensive and provides a variety of examples from different disciplines [...] it would be best be used as an instructor resource in which additional reading and resources could be pulled from to integreate into a course, yet this text could provide at least 2 or 3 weeks of content and discussion for graduate-level courses." - Colton C. Strawser, Voluntas (2020) 31: 452-453
Toward an Institutional Theory of Community and Community Associations: a Review
âCarl Milofsky
Abstract Keywords
âEditorâs Introduction: the Importance of Community Context in Understanding Local Associations and Their Activities
â1âIntroduction
â2âCommunity and Association
â3âCommunity Conflict
â4âCommunity Politics
â5âAssociations and the Institutional Theory of Community
â6âConclusion
Bibliography Author Biography
Anyone interested in the field of Voluntaristics worldwide, academics and researchers in anthropology, sociology, political science, economics, and psychology, and those interested in Area studies, the social professions, and history.