In Creating a Shared Morality, Heather Salazar develops a consistent and plausible account of ethical constructivism that rivals the traditional metaethical theories of realism and subjectivism (without lapsing into subjectivism as do previous constructivist attempts). Salazarâs Enlightenism argues that all people have moral obligations and that if they reflect well, they will naturally come to care about others as extensions of themselves. Enlightenism resolves difficulties within constructivism, builds bridges between the two traditional Western views of metaethics and employs concepts from Eastern (Buddhist) philosophy. It embraces universal morality while elevating the importance of autonomy, diversity and connectedness. Constructivist enlightenment entails understanding the interdependence of people on others such that we are all co-responsible for the world in which we live.
Heather Salazar, Ph.D. University of California, Santa Barbara. Associate Professor of Philosophy, Western New England University. Publications: Philosophy of Spirituality (Brill 2018); Intro to Philosophy of Mind (Rebus 2019); âDescartesâ and Patanjaliâs Conceptions of Selfâ, Journal of Indian Philosophy (2014).
Acknowledgements
Introduction
part 1: Arguments for Ethical Constructivism
1 Ethical Constructivism and Its Origins
â1âSupernaturalist and Realist Externalism
â2âSubjectivist and Contractarian Internalism
â3âKantian Transcendentalism and Procedural Morality
â4âKorsgaardâs Neo-Kantian Thoroughgoing Constructivism
â5âSaving Constructivism from Inadequacies: Enlightenism
2 Public Reasons as the Basis of Objective Morality
â1âProcedural Publicity
â2âReasons as the Basis for Morality
â3âKorsgaardâs Argument for the Constructive Publicity of Reasons
â4âTwo Strategies: Inductive and Deductive
3 Wittgensteinâs Private Language Argument: The Inductive Strategy
â1âThe Shareablity of Meanings and Reasons
â2âTwo Interpretations of Wittgensteinâs Private Language Argument
â3âReasons to Reject the Inductive Strategy
â4âImportant Differences between the Meanings and Reasons
4 Communicative Understanding: The Deductive Strategy
â1âThe Argument that Language Forces People to Share Reasons
â2âThe Publicity of Linguistic Consciousness
â3âObligating People to Take on Othersâ Communicated Reasons
â4âThe Distinction between Felt Obligation and Actual Obligation
â5âThe Significance of Understanding versus Endorsing Reasons
part 2: Enlightenism: A New Theory that Answers the Hard Questions
5 Three Theses: Constructivism, Publicity and Universality
â1âThe Source and Nature of Reasons
â2âTheoretical Possibilities
â3âPublic/Objective Reasons in Realism and UT
â4âPrivate/Subjective Reasons and UT
â5âWeak Realism and Mixed Theories
â6âConstructed Reasons and UT
6 The Universality of Reasons in Constructivism
â1âSimple Requests
â2âTheoretical Reasons for Universality
â3âConflicting Reasons
â4âA New Theory That Answers the Hard Questions
7 Creating Legitimate Reasons and the Enlightenist Account
â1âConferring Value in Constructivist Ethics
â2âThoroughgoing Constructivismâs Lapse into Subjectivism
â3âEnlightenism: Ideal Reflection on Relevant Identities
â4âIdeal Reflection and the Moral Identity
â5âCounterfactual Reasons
8 Private Reasons and Reasons of Autonomy
â1âReasons of Autonomy
â2âKorsgaardâs Theory and Its Incompatibility with Private Reasons
â3âReasons of Autonomy: The Natural Reading
â4âReasons of Autonomy as Public: Korsgaardâs Alternative
â5âObjections to Korsgaardâs Interpretation of Reasons of Autonomy
â6âCompetitive Ambitions
part 3: Resolving Conflicts between Reasons
9 The Relative Strength of Reasons
â1âIntuitive Differences in the Depth of Reasons
â2âA Realist View
â3âTwo Constructivist Views
10 Criterions for Distinguishing Deeper Reasons
â1âDefining Depth in Reasons
â2âThe Group Size Account
â3âThe Efficacy Account
â4âCentrality to Identity: The Entrenchment Account
â5âCentrality to Identity: The Concern Account
â6âThe Practical Impact of Depth
â7âUnintuitive Consequences versus the Importance of Autonomy
11 Buddhism and Ethical Constructivism
â1âThe Nature of Morality in Buddhism and Ethical Constructivism
â2âWe All Have Reasons to be Moral and Enlightened
â3âUnderstanding That: Interbeing in Buddhism and Ethical Constructivism
â4âTwo Truths in Buddhism and Ethical Constructivism
12 Interdependence and Self-Interest in Ethical Constructivism
â1âThe Interdependency of Relative and Absolute Truths in Buddhism
â2âCompassionate Action and Co-responsibility in Buddhism
â3âInterdependence in Ethical Constructivism
â4âSelfishness and Altruism in Constructivism
â5âAnimal Psychology, Peace, and Ethics
Conclusion Bibliography Index
All interested in metaethics, neo-Kantian deontological ethics, constructivism, subjectivism, Eastern philosophy, comparative ethics, and Christine Korsgaard. Particularly suited for professional philosophers and graduate students.