In Investigating Civilian Casualties in Time of Armed Conflict and Belligerent Occupation Alon Margalit discusses the appropriate State response to civilian casualties caused by its armed forces. Various legal and practical challenges, arising when investigating the fatal consequences of the use of force, are examined through the practice of the US, the UK, Canada and Israel during military operations in Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia and the occupied Palestinian territory. Alon Margalit considers this topical and sensitive issue within a broader context, namely the public scrutiny of State behaviour and influence of human rights law during armed conflict. The debate over the scope of the duty to investigate reflects competing approaches looking to (re)shape the balance between military necessity and humanitarian considerations.
Alon Margalit, Ph.D. (2014), University of London, is an Israeli lawyer who has held various legal positions, including at the Intentional Committee of the Red Cross, the Norwegian Refugee Council, SOAS University of London and the Tel Aviv District Court.
Preface List of Abbreviations
Part 1: Introduction
1 The Investigative Response to Civilian Casualties: More Questions Than Answers
â1.1âIntroduction
â1.2âTaking a Closer Look
â1.3âBook Overview
ââ1.3.1âThe Use of Force, Civilian Casualties and Investigations
ââ1.3.2âManoeuvring between Operational Paradigms and Legal Regimes
Part 2: Setting the Normative Framework
2 âThe Trigger Questionâ: When Do Civilian Casualties Require an Investigation?
â2.1âThe Investigation Trigger under International Human Rights Law (ihrl)
â2.2âThe Investigation Trigger under the Law of Armed Conflict (loac)
ââ2.2.1âWar Crimes
ââ2.2.2âA Failure of Precautions
ââ2.2.3âA Duty to Investigate All Cases of Civilian Casualties?
â2.3âConclusion
3 âThe Standards Questionâ: How to Investigate Civilian Casualties?
â3.1âInvestigation Standards under ihrl
ââ3.1.1âGeneral
ââ3.1.2âAn Effective Investigation
ââ3.1.3âIndependence and Impartiality
ââ3.1.4âVictim Involvement and Transparency
ââ3.1.5âA Formal and Professional Investigation and the Margin of Appreciation
â3.2âInvestigation Standards under loac
ââ3.2.1âGeneral
ââ3.2.2âWar Crimes
ââ3.2.3âA Failure of Precautions
â3.3âConclusion
4 Translating Investigation Obligations to loac Situations
â4.1âThe Interaction between ihrl and loac
â4.2âClassification Issues
â4.3âInternational Armed Conflict (iac)
â4.4âNon-international Armed Conflict (niac)
â4.5âA Conduct-of-Hostilities Paradigm: Temporal and Geographical Dimensions
â4.6âOccupation
ââ4.6.1âGeneral
ââ4.6.2âTroubled Occupation
ââ4.6.3âThe Use of Force
â4.7âConclusion
Part 3: Investigating Civilian Casualties in Practice
5 Challenges in Classifying and Identifying the Applicable Normative Framework(s)
â5.1ââStretchingâ a Hostilities Paradigm
ââ5.1.1âus
ââ5.1.2âuk
ââ5.1.3âIsrael
â5.2ââStretchingâ a Law-Enforcement Paradigm
ââ5.2.1âIraq
ââ5.2.2âAfghanistan
ââ5.2.3âoPt
â5.3âUncertainty in Relation to the Intensity Test
â5.4âiac/niac Classification
â5.5âFurther Complications: Additional Legal Sources and Policy Considerations
ââ5.5.1âuk, Canada
ââ5.5.2âus
â5.6âThe Applicability of ihrl
ââ5.6.1âGeneral
ââ5.6.2âEffective Control and Provision of Governmental Services
ââ5.6.3âConsent of the Local Government
ââ5.6.4âProlonged Occupation
â5.7âAl-Skeini and Bâtselem Cases: Two Sides of a Legal Coin
ââ5.7.1âAl-Skeini
ââ5.7.2âBâtselem
â5.8âConclusion
6 Investigation Models and Constraints in Domestic Military Justice Systems
â6.1âIntroduction
â6.2âModels Identified in State Practice
ââ6.2.1âThe Commander Model
ââ6.2.2âThe Professional Model
ââ6.2.3âA Mixed Model: Mandatory Reporting to a Professional Body in Serious Cases
â6.3âConclusion
7 Military In-House Investigations and Some Mitigating Arrangements
â7.1âCommand Investigations
ââ7.1.1âA Controversial Mechanism
ââ7.1.2âJudging Command Investigations in Light of Their Function
â7.2âConsidering Mitigating Arrangements
ââ7.2.1âEnhancing the Involvement of Professional Bodies
ââ7.2.2âSetting Time Frames and Considering Initial Findings Carefully
ââ7.2.3âOpenness
â7.3âProblems with Professional Bodies
ââ7.3.1âFailure to Open a Formal and Professional Investigation
ââ7.3.2âProblems with the Conduct of Criminal Investigations
â7.4âConclusion
8 Civilian Oversight of Military Investigations
â8.1âAn Ad Hoc Civilian Investigatory Body
â8.2âAdministrative Review
â8.3âJudicial Review
ââ8.3.1âGeneral
ââ8.3.2âJurisdiction and Admissibility
ââ8.3.3âThe Scope of Review
â8.4âA Permanent Civilian Expert Body
ââ8.4.1âThe mpcc (Canada)
ââ8.4.2âhmic (uk)
ââ8.4.3âIsrael
â8.5âConclusion
Part 4: Looking Forward
9 A Proposal for a Permanent Expert Commission
â9.1âA Question of Mandate
ââ9.1.1âGeneral
ââ9.1.2âExternal-Civilian Investigations?
ââ9.1.3âihrl and Lessons Learned from the Civilian Oversight of Police Investigations
â9.2âThe Proposed Mandate
10 The Duty to Investigate and Shaping the Normative Discourse
â10.1âThe Difficulties of Investigating
â10.2âEnhanced Scrutiny and Heavier Burden
â10.3âState Pushback
â10.4âA Permanent Expert Commission: Incentives for States
â10.5âConclusion
Table of Treaties and Other International Instruments Table of International Cases 26 Table of Domestic Instruments Table of Domestic Cases Bibliography
All interested in public international law, in particular humanitarian law and human rights law, and anyone concerned with military justice and war studies or working in conflict and post-conflict settings.