The book undertakes a thorough human rights assessment of the EU Returns Directive. The overarching human rights framework, which circumscribes states prerogatives in the context of expulsion, builds upon obligations derived from the principle of non-refoulement; the right to life, respect for family and private life, effective remedy, basic social rights; the prohibition of torture and ill-treatment; and protection against arbitrary detention and collective expulsion. Based on this assessment, Majcher explores several protection gaps in the EU return policy which may result in violations of migrantsâ rights and highlights how the provisions of the Directive should be implemented in line with member statesâ human rights obligations. Informed by this assessment, the book discusses amendments to the Directive, proposed by the European Commission in September 2018.
âBy examining the European Union (EU) Returns Directive in the light of international and European human rights law, Izabella Majcher thoroughly explores and analyses the requirements the EU member statesâ authorities must guarantee migrants in an irregular situation when they adopt and implement return decisions, entry bans, pre-removal detention, and removal.â Marie-Laure Basilien-Gainche, Professor of public international law, University Jean Moulin Lyon 3, Honorary member of the Institut universitaire de France
Izabella Majcher, Ph.D. (Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva, 2017), is a researcher at the Global Detention Project and visitor to immigration detainees in Geneva with the Ligue Suisse des Droits de lâHomme. She has published widely on the EU returns policy and has experience in various international fora (UN system, diplomatic representations, and NGOs).
Acknowledgements
Abbreviations and Country Codes
Part 1 Introduction
1 The Returns Directive against the Background of International and EU Human Rights Law:Â Setting the Scene
â1.1 The Returns Directive
ââ1.1.1 Presentation of the Returns Directive
ââ1.1.2 Instruments Required for the Implementation of the Returns Directive
ââ1.1.3 The Returns Directive within the EU Asylum and Immigration Policy
â1.2 Sources of the Human Rights Protection in the Context of Expulsion
ââ1.2.1 International Human Rights Law
ââ1.2.2 EU Human Rights Law
â1.3 The Need for a Human Rights Assessment of the Returns Directive in the Context of the Recast Process
Part 2 Return Decision Introduction: The Scheme of Return under EU Law
2 Human Rights Impediments to Return
â2.1 Introduction
â2.2 The Principle of Non-Refoulement
ââ2.2.1 The Scope of the Principle of Non-Refoulement
ââ2.2.2 Implementation of the Principle of Non-Refoulement
â2.3 Family and Private Life
ââ2.3.1 The Scope of the Concepts of Family and Private Life
ââ2.3.2 The Implementation of the Right to Respect for Family and Private Life
â2.4 Conclusion
3 Procedural Safeguards
â3.1 Introduction
â3.2 Prohibition of Collective Expulsion
â3.3 The Right to Be Heard Prior to Adoption of the Return Decision
â3.4 Effective Remedy
ââ3.4.1 Accessibility of Remedy
ââ3.4.2 Effectiveness of Remedy
â3.5 Additional Child-Specific Safeguards
ââ3.5.1 The Right to Be Heard
ââ3.5.2 The Guardianship Assistance for Unaccompanied Children
â3.6 Conclusion
4 Social Rights Pending Return
â4.1 Introduction
â4.2 Health Care
â4.3 Education
â4.4 Adequate Standard of Living
ââ4.4.1 Basic Conditions of Subsistence Addressed in the Preamble of the Directive
ââ4.4.2 Can Destitution Entail a Duty to Regularise?
â4.5 Conclusion
Conclusion:Â Legal Limbo for Non-Deportable People
Part 3 Re-Entry Ban Introduction: Entry Ban as Pan-European Effect of Return Decision
5 Entry Ban in the Light of the Principle of Proportionality
â5.1 Introduction
â5.2 The Nature of Entry Ban
â5.3 The Schengen-Wide Character of Entry Ban
â5.4 Conclusion
6 Human Rights Impediments to Entry Ban
â6.1 Introduction
â6.2 The Principle of Non-Refoulement
ââ6.2.1 Endorsement of the Principle of Non-Refoulement in Relation to Entry Ban
ââ6.2.2 Implementation of the Principle of Non-Refoulement in Relation to Entry Ban
â6.3 Family and Private Life
â6.4 Conclusion
7 Protection of Personal Data Stored in a SIS Alert
â7.1 Introduction
â7.2 The Right to Data Protection
ââ7.2.1 The Right to Information
ââ7.2.2 The Right of Access
ââ7.2.3 The Right to Correction and Deletion of Data
ââ7.2.4 The Right to a Remedy
â7.3 The Right to Private Life
â7.4 Conclusion
Conclusion:Â Schengen-Wide Entry Ban:Â a Triple Peine?
Part 4 Pre-Removal Detention Introduction: Immigration Detention in the Light of the Prohibition of Arbitrary Detention
8 Permissibility of Detention
â8.1 Introduction
â8.2 Lawfulness of Detention
ââ8.2.1 Procedural Requirements:Â the Rights of the Defence
ââ8.2.2 Substantive Requirements:Â the Grounds for Detention
â8.3 Necessity and Proportionality of Detention
ââ8.3.1 Alternatives to Detention
ââ8.3.2 The Rule of Non-Detention of Children
â8.4 Length of Detention
ââ8.4.1 The Maximum Permissible Duration of Detention
ââ8.4.2 Risk of Re-Detention upon the Expiry of the Permissible Length of Detention
â8.5 Detention at the Border:Â Out of the Directiveâs Safeguards?
â8.6 Conclusion
9 Procedural Safeguards
â9.1 Introduction
â9.2 Review of Detention
ââ9.2.1 Accessibility of Review
ââ9.2.2 Effectiveness of Review
â9.3 Compensation for Unlawful Detention
â9.4 Conclusion
10 Conditions of Detention
â10.1 Introduction
â10.2 Place of Detention and Separation of Different Categories of Detainees
â10.3 Treatment in Detention and Material Conditions
â10.4 Specific Categories of Detainees
ââ10.4.1 Children
ââ10.4.2 Other Vulnerable Persons
â10.5 Contact with the Outside World and Independent Monitoring
â10.6 Complaint Mechanisms and Effective Investigation
â10.7 Conclusion
Conclusion:Â Externalisation of Immigration Detention
Part 5 Enforcement of Return Introduction: Enforcement of the Return Decision as the Final Stage of the Return Process
11 Mandatory (âVoluntaryâ) Return
â11.1 Introduction
â11.2 âVoluntaryâ Departure Period
â11.3 Assisted Voluntary Return Programmes and Ambiguous Role of the IOM
â11.4 Conclusion
12 Forcible Return
â12.1 Introduction
â12.2 Removal
ââ12.2.1 Returneeâs Medical Condition
ââ12.2.2 The Use of Force and Means of Restraint
ââ12.2.3 Deportation Personnel
ââ12.2.4 Independent Monitoring
ââ12.2.5 Complaint Mechanisms and Effective Investigation
â12.3 Joint Removal Operations
ââ12.3.1 Joint Removal Flights under the Council Decision 2004/573
ââ12.3.2 Joint Return Operations Coordinated by Frontex
â12.4 Conclusion
13 Removal to a Transit Country Based on Readmission Agreements
â13.1 Introduction
â13.2 Indirect Refoulement
ââ13.2.1 The Concept of Safe Third Country
ââ13.2.2 Removal to a Transit Country under the Returns Directive
â13.3 Collective Expulsion
â13.4 Conclusion
Conclusion:Â Post-Return Monitoring:Â a Missing Element
Part 6 Conclusion 14 The Returns Directive:Â Effectiveness of Return vs. Human Rights Protection
â14.1 Critical Overview of the EU Return Process
â14.2 Return Procedures against the Backdrop of International and EU Human Rights Law
ââ14.2.1 Risks to Human Rights Protection
ââ14.2.2 Upholding Human Rights Protection
â14.3 Way Forward
ââ14.3.1 The Recast of the Returns Directive
ââ14.3.2 The Implementation in line with Statesâ Human Rights Obligations
Annexes
Annex 1 Ratifications of International Instruments:Â United Nations
Annex 2 Ratifications of International Instruments:Â Council of Europe
Annex 3 Reservations
Annex 4 Domestic Legislation Transposing the Returns Directive
Annex 5 Return Decisions 2012â2018
Annex 6 Entry Bans 2009â2013
Annex 7 Entry Bans in 2013
Annex 8 Detention Orders in 2013
Annex 9 Maximum Length of Detention Prior to and after the Transposition of the Directive
Annex 10 Removals 2012â2018
Annex 11 Voluntary Returns (Numbers and Percentage) 2014â2017
Annex 12 Assisted Returns (Numbers and Percentage) 2014â2017
Annex 13 Forcible Returns (Numbers and Percentage) 2014â2017
Annex 14 Frontexâs Return Operations 2006â2017
Bibliography
Index
Academics researching EU policy targeting undocumented migrants and their rights and practitioners, including lawyers, experts, non-governmental and inter-governmental organizations, and domestic and EU policy-makers in the field of migration law and policy.