In this book Aoife Daly argues that where courts decide childrenâs best interests (for example about parental contact) the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child's "right to be heard" is insufficient, and autonomy should instead be the focus. Global law and practice indicate that children are regularly denied due process rights in their own best interest proceedings and find their wishes easily overridden. It is argued that a childrenâs autonomy principle, respecting childrenâs wishes unless significant harm would likely result, would ensure greater support for children in proceedings, and greater obligations on adults to engage in transparent decision-making. This book is a call for a reconceptualisation of the status of children in a key area of childrenâs rights.
Aoife Daly, Ph.D. (2011), Trinity College Dublin, is Senior Lecturer in Law at the School of Law and Social Justice and the European Childrenâs Rights Unit at the University of Liverpool. She writes, teaches and advocates extensively on childrenâs rights.
"The book is exceptionally clear and academically rigorousâit is a pleasure to read. The foreword of Dalyâs book is written by Professor Emeritus Michael Freeman, (...). There can be no greater accolade than his ringing endorsement and I can only concur with his view that the book âis thorough, perceptive and novel and will set a benchmark for future analyses of childrenâs rights in the context of the courts and beyond.â " Emma Cave, Professor in Healthcare Law, Durham University, Human Rights Quarterly, Volume 40, Number 4, November 2018, pp. 1041-1045. "This book is useful for anyone working or researching in the area of childrenâs participation in family law or child protection proceedings. It constitutes a thoroughly researched summary of the way childrenâs views are heard and taken into account in many different jurisdictions throughout the world.To that end it can be used as a reference book itself. Dalyâs research offers those who may have influence over how children are heard in proceedings, such as judges, welfare officers and lawyers for children, a better way of thinking about how childrenâs voices can be genuinely heard in a way that is respectful and impactful. It is hoped that this book may be a starting point for reframing the way we think about childrenâs views and making changes to family law and child protection policies and practices." Nicola Ross, Senior Lecturer, Newcastle Law School, University of Newcastle, Australia and Michelle Fernando, Senior Lecturer, School of Law, University of South Australia, International Journal of Childrenâs Rights 26 (2018) pp. 837-847.
Foreword Preface A Child-Friendly Summary Acknowledgments
Introduction: Children, Autonomy and the Courts: Beyond the Right to be Heard
â1âThe Argument in Favour of Prioritising Childrenâs Autonomy in Best Interest Proceedings
â2âThe Problem with Best Interest Proceedings
â3âIntroducing the Childrenâs Autonomy Principle
â4âThe Aim of this Book: Embedding Childrenâs Autonomy in Official Decisions
â5âOverview of this Book
1 A Proposal: Replace the âRight to be Heardâ with a âChildrenâs Autonomy Principleâ
ââIntroduction
â1âChildren and Proceedings: Is Article 12 Effective or is it Just Rhetoric?
â2âThe Obscured Autonomy Idea in the crc 21
â3âLetâs Talk about Autonomy Instead of a Right to be Heard
â4âDo Children Want Autonomy in Proceedings?
â5âWhy the Text of crc Article 12 is Flawed
â6âThe Right to be Heard is a Right Particular to Children: Due Process and Fair Trial Rights
â7âComparison with Legal Rights for Adults with Cognitive Impairment
â8âConcluding Thoughts on the Validity of the âRight to be Heardâ in Proceedings
2 The Childrenâs Autonomy Principle and the Best Interest of the Child
ââIntroduction
â1âThe âChildrenâs Rightsâ Age: The Legal Journey and the Best Interest Principle
â2âThe Best Interest Principle: Focusing on the Child
â3âWhere Should the Limits of the Best Interest Principle Lie?
â4âThe Best Interest Principle in Practice
â5âThe Interests of Which Children?
âConcluding Thoughts on Autonomy in the Context of the Best Interest Principle
3 The âLiberal Idealâ: Autonomy, Capacity and the Adult/Child Divide
ââIntroduction
â1âIntroducing Autonomy
â2âWhat Does âAutonomyâ Actually Mean?
â3âSelf Determination Theory: Autonomy as Crucial to Well-being
â4âIs it so Obvious that Children Should be Denied Legal Autonomy?
â5âWhat We Can Learn about Autonomy from Medical Law
â6âChildrenâs Autonomy in Medical Law (Compared to Other Areas of Law): A Different Ball Game?
â7âDevelopmental Psychology and Childrenâs Decision-Making Abilities
âConclusions on Children and Autonomy
4 Ensuring Good Processes for Children through Respect for Autonomy
ââIntroduction
â1âProvision at National Level for the Right of Children to be Heard in Best Interest Proceedings
â2âProviding the Opportunity: Too Little Too Late?
â3âDo Children Enjoy the Right to be Heard the Way they Wish?
âConcluding Thoughts on the Process of the Right to be Heard
5 âWeighingâ Views: The Right to be Heard Does Not Allow Children to Sufficiently Influence Outcomes
ââIntroduction
â1âThe Right to be Heard is Not Making a Sufficient Difference
â2âThe Right to be Heard Has Benefited Some Older Children
â3âYounger Childrenâs Wishes Devalued
â4âWhy the Right to be Heard Gives Children Little Influence on Outcomes
â5âConcluding Thoughts on the Inability of Children to Influence Outcomes
6 Putting the Autonomy Principle into Practice: Moving from a Focus on âCompetenceâ to One on Significant Harm
ââIntroduction
â1âJustifying a Focus on Significant Harm
â2âRedefining Harm: Repressing Autonomy as Harmful
â3âSignificant Harm in the Context of Respect for Childrenâs Autonomy
â4âThe Concern that Children Will be Pressured or Manipulated in Proceedings
â5âThe Complexity of Reality: Resources and Other Obstacles
â6âThe Process of the Childrenâs Autonomy Principle and Its Application
ââConcluding Thoughts on a Focus on Significant Harm
7 Autonomy Support: Embedding the Childrenâs Autonomy Principle in Good Systems
âIntroduction
â1âA Different Approach for Legal Systems: Children as Equals
â2âBalancing Autonomy and the Integrity of the Family
â3âNot Just Providing an Opportunity: Encouraging and Assisting
â4âAutonomy Support: Structuring Respect
â5âSystems Suitable for Autonomy Support
âConclusions on Embedding the Childrenâs Autonomy Principle in Good Systems
Conclusion
â1âRecognising that Children Deserve More than a Right to be Heard
â2âPrioritising Childrenâs Autonomy in the Courts: Moving beyond a Right to be Heard
â3âReframing the Best Interest Principle to Explicitly Include Autonomy
â4âRespecting Families and Supporting Autonomy
â5âReframing Systems for Best Interest Proceedings
Index
All institutes, academic libraries, specialists, post-graduate students, practitioners, with an interest in childrenâs rights, autonomy, legal representation, the courts, social work, family law, and civil rights generally.