As the tensions involving religion and society increase, the European Court of Human Rights and the Freedom of Religion or Belief is the first systematic analysis of the first twenty-five years of the European Court's religion jurisprudence. The Court is one of the most significant institutions confronting the interactions among states, religious groups, minorities, and dissenters. In the 25 years since its first religion case, Kokkinakis v. Greece, the Court has inserted itself squarely into the international human rights debate regarding the freedom of religion or belief. The authors demonstrate the positive contributions and the significant flaws of the Court's jurisprudence involving religion, society, and secularism.
Jeroen Temperman is Professor of International Law and Religion at Erasmus School of Law, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Netherlands. He is also the Editor-in-Chief of the journal Religion & Human Rights and a member of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europeâs Panel of Experts on Freedom of Religion or Belief. He has authored, among other books, Religious Hatred and International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2016) and StateâReligion Relationships and Human Rights Law (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2010) and edited Blasphemy and Freedom of Expression (Cambridge University Press, 2017) and The Lautsi Papers (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2012).
Sir Malcom Evans, KCMG is Professor of Public International Law at Bristol University. He has published widely the protection of the freedom of religion or belief, including Religious Freedom and International Law (Cambridge, 1997) and The Changing Nature of Religious Rights (Oxford, 2015).
âThe collection accomplishes to depict Article 9 and the Courtâs related challenges, approaches and jurisprudence in a comprehensive mannerâ and âit provides a critical and comprehensive analysis of Article 9 of the ECHR, primarily aimed at academics and ECtHR practitionersâ.
Christina Seewald, European Yearbook on Human Rights 2019, page 579-581 (Intersentia).
âContributors
âTable of Legislation
âTable of Cases
âIntroduction
âT. Jeremy Gunn, Jeroen Temperman and Malcolm Evans
Pre-Kokkinakis and Post-Kokkinakis
1âPre-KokkinakisCase Law of the European Court of Human Rights: Foreshadowing the Future
âCarolyn Evans
2âThe Freedom of Religion or Belief in the echr sinceKokkinakisor âQuotingKokkinakisâ
âMalcolm Evans
Article 9 Jurisprudence: General Contours
3âManifestations of Religion or Belief in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights
âJavier MartÃnez-Torrón
4âLimitations on Freedom of Religion and Belief in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights
âMark Hill QC and Katherine Barnes
5âAvoiding Scrutiny? The Margin of Appreciation and Religious Freedom
âStephanie Berry
6âMarginal Neutrality â Neutrality and the Margin of Appreciation in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights
âMalcolm Evans and Peter Petkoff
Religion Jurisprudence: Thematic Studies
7âKokkinakis and the Narratives of Proper and Improper Proselytizing
âBrett G. Scharffs
8âEducation & Freedom of Religion or Belief under the European Convention on Human Rights and Protocol No. 1
âJeroen Temperman
9âReligion and Equality: From Managing Pluralism towards a European Requirement of State Neutrality
âRenata Uitz
10âFreedom of Religion or Belief and Employment Law: The Evolving Approach of the European Court of Human Rights
âLucy Vickers
11âFreedom of Religion or Belief and Freedom of Association: Intersecting Rights in the Jurisprudence of the European Convention Mechanisms
âIoana Cismas
12âConscientious Objection under the echr: The Ugly Duckling of a Flightless Jurisprudence
âStijn Smet
13âReligion, Expression and Pluralism
âAgnes Callamard
14âReligious Symbols and State Regulation: Assessing the Strategic Role of the European Court of Human Rights
âDominic McGoldrick
Reflections
15âThe Legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights in Light of Its Article 9 Jurisprudence: A Multisided Perspective
âEva Brems and Saïla Ouald Chaib
16âImplementation and Impact of Strasbourg Court Rulings: The Case of Religious Minorities and Their Convention Freedoms
âDia Anagnostou
17âGrassroots Level Awareness about Religion at the European Court of Human Rights
âEffie Fokas
18âA Matter of Judgment: Dissenting Opinions in Cases Concerning Religion or Belief in the European Court of Human Rights
âSophie van Bijsterveld
19ââPrinciple of Secularismâ and the European Court of Human Rights: A Shell Game
âT. Jeremy Gunn
âBibliography
âIndex
All concerned about legal responses to conflicts involving religion and society in contemporary Europe and the world.â