In For Out of Babylonia Shall Come Torah and the Word of the Lord from Nehar Peqod, Barak S. Cohen reevaluates the evidence in Tannaitic and Amoraic literature of an independent âBabylonian Mishnahâ which originated in the proto-talmudic period. The book focuses on an analysis of the most notable halakhic corpora that have been identified by scholars as originating in the Tannaitic period or at the outset of the amoraic. If indeed such an early corpus did exist, what are its characteristics and what, if any, connection does it have with the parallel Palestinian collections? Was this Babylonian Mishnah created in order to harmonize the Palestinian Mishnah with a corpus of rabbinic teachings already existent in Babylonia?
Was this corpus one of the main contributors to the forced interpretations and resolutions found so frequently in the Bavli?
Barak S. Cohen, Ph.D. (2004) in Talmud and Rabbinics, is a senior lecturer at the Department of Talmud, Faculty of Jewish Studies, Bar-Ilan University. He has published extensively on the intellectual history, chronology and historiography of the Babylonian Amoraim. His previous book, The Legal Methodology of Late Nehardean Sages in Sasanian Babylonia, was published in 2011.
Acknowledgements
1 Introduction: A Reassesment of the Existence of Babylonian Tannaitic Traditions
ââBabylonian Mishnah,â âBabylonian Baraitot,â and âAmoraic Baraitotâ
âThe Significance of the Study of Early Babylonian Traditions
âThe Halakhic Corpora Discussed in This Study
âHistory of Scholarship
ââIntroductory Terms
ââBaraitot Which Interpret, Expand, or Add to the Mishnah
ââA Brief and Anonymous Formulation, without Attribution to Tannaim
ââThe Absence of a Parallel in Palestinian Tannaitic Literature
ââThe Relationship between Baraitot and Amoraic Memrot
ââLate Insertions of Halakhot and Interpretations into Earlier Baraitot
ââThe Names of Sages and Their Geographical Location
âFindings and Conclusions
ââThe Origin and Nature of Halakha in Babylonia during the Second-Third Centuries
ââThe Historical Reliability of Attributions
ââThe Literary Contribution of Babylonian Sages from the Pre-talmudic Period
2 In Quest of Babylonian Halakha in Tannaitic Compositions
âBabylonian Rabbinic Traditions in the Proto-talmudic Era: A History of Scholarship
âSummary and Conclusions
Appendix: A Survey of the Main Evidence Presented by Scholars as Proof for the Existence of âBabylonian Halakhotâ from the Mishnaic Period
âCircumstancial Evidence
âSources in the Babylonian Talmud
ââb. Sukkah 20a
ââb. Pesaḥ. 109a
ââb. Git. 14b = b. Ketub. 94b
ââb. B. Bat. 7b
ââb. Beá¹£ah 34b
ââb. Å abb. 6b = Å abb. 96b
ââb. Ḥul. 63b
ââb. Beá¹£ah 6a
ââb. Nid. 14a
ââb. Å abb. 35b
ââb. Git. 65b
âSources in the Palestinian Talmud
âây. Ḥal. 4:4 (60a)
âây. Taâan. 1:1 (63d) = b. Taâan. 10a
âây. Sanh. 8:4 (26b) = y. Soá¹ah 4:12 (19c) = Sifre Deut. 118 (ed. Finkelstein, p. 251)
âây. Sanh. 1:3 (19a) = y. Ned. 6:8 (40a) = b. Ber. 63a-b
âây. Å abb. 5:4 (7c) = y. Beá¹£ah 2:8 (61c)
âây. Qidd. 3:5 (64a) = b. Git. 14a
âMidrashic Sources
ââGenesis Rabbah 33:3 (ed. Theodor-Albeck, p. 306)
ââMidrash Psalms 104:22 (ed. Buber, p. 446)
âThe Gaonic Evidence: R Sherira Gaon
ââR. Sherira Gaon, Epistle of R. Sherira Gaon, p 40
3 The Legal Traditions of Avuha-De-Shmuel
âIntroduction
âEarly Babylonian Halakhic Traditions?
âHis Halakhic Rulings
âHis Commentary on and Emendation of Tannaitic Sources
âAvuha De-Shmuelâs Customs
âSummary and Conclusions
5 Leviâs Baraitot: Tannei Levi, Tanna Dâbei Levi
âIntroduction
âPrevious Scholarship
âBaraitot Which Interpret, Expand, or Add to the Mishnah
âAnalysis of Sugyot
âLaws Related to Topics Not Covered by the Mishnah
âBaraitot That Differ from the Mishnah or Dispute It
âSummary and Conclusions
Appendix: A List of All Leviâs Baraitot and Their Parallels in Rabbinic Literature
âBabylonian Talmud
âPalestinian Talmud
6 Shmuelâs Baraitot: Tanna DâBei Shmuel, Tannei Shmuel
âIntroduction
âPrevious Scholarship
âAnalysis of Sugyot
âSummary and Conclusions
Appendix: Shmuelâs Attitude towards the Tanna DâBei Shmuel Baraitot
7 âThey Teach Thereâ (â×ª× ×× ×ª××â): âBabylonian Baraitotâ in the Palestinian Talmud
âIntroduction
âRe-evaluating Previous Research: Early Babylonian Halakhic Traditions?
âAnalysis of Sugyot
âSummary and Conclusions
Appendix: The Halakhot Transmitted in the âThey Teach Thereâ (â×ª× ×× ×ª××â) Baraitot in the Palestinian Talmud and Their Parallels in Tannaitic Literature
8 The Tannei Tanna Kameh Baraitot
âIntroduction
âInterpretations and Expansions of the Mishnah
âBaraitot Containing Amoraic Additions
âBaraitot That Were Rejected or Emended
âSummary and Conclusions
Appendix A: A Detailed List of Halakhot Found in ttk Baraitot and Their Parallels in Tannaitic Literature
âBabylonian Talmud
âPalestinian Talmud
Appendix B: ttk Baraitot in the Babylonian Talmud Without an Amoraic Response
9 Shmuel: A Model of Halakhic Consistency
âIntroduction
âThe State of Scholarship: An Evaluation
âA New Appraisal of Shmuelâs Halakhic Methodology Shmuel Rules According to the More Lenient Opinion
âAdopting the Opinion of âBabylonian Tannaimâ
âSummary and Conclusions
Appendix A: Halakhic Rulings in the Two Talmuds Issued by Shmuel Using the Term âHalakhaâ or âHilkhetaâ (â××××â/â×××ת×â) and the Names of the Amoraim Who Transmitted Them
âBabylonian Talmud
âPalestinian Talmud
Appendix B: Decisions Made by Shmuel Which Accord with the More Lenient Tanna
âBabylonian Talmud
âPalestinian Talmud
âUncertain Cases
Bibliography Index
All those interested in intellectual history, the history of Late Antiquity and Jewish law.