Vincent Guillin uses the issue of sexual equality as a prism through which to examine important differences â epistemological, methodological and theoretical â between Auguste Comte and John Stuart Mill. He succeeds in showing how their differing conceptions of science and human nature influence and affect their respective approaches to philosophy and to the analysis of female (in)equality in particular. Guillin shines a bright searchlight into long-neglected aspects of both menâs thinking â for example, Millâs proposal to construct an âethologyâ, or science of character-formation, and Comteâs seemingly bizarre interest in phrenology â and the ways in which these shaped their views of womenâs intellectual and political capacities. Guillinâs wide-ranging study examines both menâs major and minor works, their correspondence with one another, and the reasons for the final acrimonious break between two of the nineteenth centuryâs most original and important thinkers.
Acknowledgments
Abbreviations
Introduction
1. Comte and Mill on Sexual Equality: Context and Problems
2. The Female Brain and the Subjection of Women: Biology, Phrenology and Sexual Equality
3. The Phrenological Controversy
4. The Explanation of Moral Phenomena: Comte and Mill on the Architectonics of the Moral Sciences
5. A Never Ending Subjection? Comte, Mill, and the Sociological Argument against Sexual Equality
6. The Ethological Fiasco: The Methodological Shortcomings of the Millian Science of the Formation of Character
7. How To Discover Oneâs Nature: Millâs Argument for Emancipation in the Subjection of Women
Conclusion
Appendix: Comtean Studies, 1993-2000
Bibliography
Index
All those interested in the history of ideas, nineteenth-century philosophy, and the history of science.