Save

The Challenge of “Chineseness”: Taiwan’s Identity and Education Policy for Hua-ch’iao and Malaysian Chinese from the 1990s to 2000s

In: Translocal Chinese: East Asian Perspectives
Authors:
Tak Wai Hung Assistant Professor, Waseda Institute for Advanced Studies, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan

Search for other papers by Tak Wai Hung in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Yuk Sing Kwan Bachelor of Art, Department of Sociology, University of Bedfordshire, Bedfordshire, UK

Search for other papers by Yuk Sing Kwan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Ka Hung Ching Master of Arts, Graduate Institute of National Development, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan

Search for other papers by Ka Hung Ching in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€36.93

Abstract

This manuscript delves into the complexities of imagined hua-ch’iao identity and its interplay with the Taiwanese education policies for overseas Chinese in Malaysia from the 1990s to the 2000s. By examining the shift in Taiwan’s stance toward Chinese in diaspora, the study underscores the devolution of hua-ch’iao education within the broader context of Taiwan’s quest for a distinct national identity from China. We explore the historical underpinnings and the ideological shifts that informed the policies under the Kuomintang (kmt) and the Democratic Progressive Party (dpp), highlighting the contentious debate over “Chineseness” and its implications for overseas Chinese communities. By tracing the changes in educational policy, the study reflects on the broader questions of identity, nationalism, and the politics of belonging in the era of globalization. It raises critical inquiries about Taiwan’s engagement with overseas Chinese communities and the conceptual challenges of defining “Chineseness” since the twenty-first century.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 871 359 32
Full Text Views 18 7 0
PDF Views & Downloads 48 21 1