Rule of Law and Institutional Legitimacy: Challenges of Transition, Challenges of Europe
In: Southeastern EuropeSearch for other papers by Prof. dr. Nina Peršak in
Current site
Google Scholar
Recent European events have revealed that some eu Member States, including some South Eastern European (see) States, still struggle with the rule of law. While certain rule of law challenges may be due to past legacies and insufficient (or insufficiently successful) transitions, others may be the result of the transition itself and of contemporary socio-economic problems that are experienced across Europe. This article will address the state of the rule of law in see, reflecting first on some pre-, mid-, and post-transition problems relevant for the rule of law in these countries. Next, it will address the legal and socio-psychological impact of the challenges posed by the mentioned problems, connecting the (mis)trust that can be observed on several levels (internally and externally) with the rule of law, thus demonstrating that mistrust as such has social as well as legal consequences. If trust (e.g. in the effectiveness of the rule of law safeguards or in those who are entrusted with safeguarding it) is lacking, this represents a problem not only for the Member State (e.g. for the functioning and perceived legitimacy of its judicial system) in question, but also for the eu (e.g. for the judicial cooperation in criminal matters). Lastly, the article will examine the eu’s perspective on rule of law, drawing on the recent eu Framework to Strengthen the Rule of Law, which aims to ensure an effective and coherent protection of the rule of law in all Member States, as well as on some other eu documents that may, in our view, help address the current challenges in European rule of law.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Belovič M.2014. “Potret tedna: Luka Mesec – novi obraz nove levice,” Delo, Sobotna priloga, July 19, 2014, http://www.delo.si/zgodbe/sobotnapriloga/portret-tedna-luka-mesec-novi-obraz-nove-levice.html (accessed on 19 July 2014).
-
Botero J.C., , Nelson R.L. and C. Pratt. 2011. “Indices and indicators of justice, governance, and the rule of law: An overview,” Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 3: 153–169. <doi:10.1017/S1876404511200010> (accessed on 15 July 2014).
-
Burlyuk O.2013. European Union Rule of Law Promotion in Ukraine: Exploring the Effects of Interaction Between the Institutional Contexts (doctoral dissertation) (Brussels: Brussels School of International Studies of The Department of Politics and International Relations in The Faculty of Social Sciences of The University of Kent).
-
Bučar B.2004. “Independence and integration into the international community: A window of opportunity,” in M. Mrak, M. Rojec and C. Silva-Jauregui (eds.), Slovenia: From Yugoslavia to the European Union (Washington: The World Bank): 32–52.
-
Castles S., and Davidson A.. 2000. Citizenship and Migration: Globalization and the Politics of Belonging (Basingstoke: Macmillan Press).
-
Crawford A.2000. “Situational crime prevention, urban governance and trust relations,” in A. von Hirsch, D. Garland and A. Wakefield (eds.), Ethical and Social Perspectives on Situational Crime Prevention (Oxford: Hart Publishing): 193–215.
-
Deflem M.2008. Sociology of Law: Visions of a Scholarly Tradition (Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press).
-
Dobovšek B.2012. “Rule of law versus financial crime,” in M. Edelbacher, P.C. Kratcoski and M. Theil (eds.), Financial Crimes: A Threat to Global Security (Boca Raton: crc Press): 161–176.
-
Elholm T.2014. “Legitimacy and eu criminal law regulation,” in: N. Peršak (ed.), Legitimacy and Trust in Criminal Law, Policy and Justice: Norms, Procedures, Outcomes (Farnham, Burlington: Ashgate): 71–86.
-
Erbežnik A.2014. “Mutual Recognition in eu Criminal Law and Its Effects on the Role of a National Judge,” in N. Peršak (ed.), Legitimacy and Trust in Criminal Law, Policy and Justice: Norms, Procedures, Outcomes (Farnham, Burlington: Ashgate): 131–151.
-
Eurobarometer. 2013. Flash Eurobarometer 385: Justice in the eu, Nov. 2013, <http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/flash/fl_385_en.pdf> (accessed on 14 September 2014).
-
———. 2014. Standard Eurobarometer 81: Public Opinion in the European Union (Spring 2014). http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb81/eb81_publ_en.pdf (accessed on 30 October 2014).
-
European Commission. 2012. Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on Progress in Romania under the Cooperation and Verification Mechanism, com(2012) 410 final, 18 July 2012, <http://ec.europa.eu/cvm/docs/com_2012_410_en.pdf> (accessed on 15 December 2012).
-
———. 2012b. Court of Justice rules Hungarian forced early retirement of judges incompatible with eu law, Press release, 6 November 2012, <http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_memo-12-832_en.htm> (accessed on 5 May 2013).
-
———. 2013. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Central Bank, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions – The eu Justice Scoreboard: a tool for effective justice and growth, com(2013) 160 final, 27 March 2013, <http://ec.europa.eu/justice/effective-justice/files/justice_scoreboard_communication_en.pdf> (accessed on 5 May 2013).
-
———. 2014a. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: The eu Justice Agenda for 2020 – Strengthening Trust, Mobility and Growth within the Union, com(2014) 144 final, 11 March 2014.
-
———. 2014b. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council: A new eu Framework to strengthen the Rule of Law, com(2014) 158 final, 11 March 2014.
-
Finnis J.1980. Natural Law and Natural Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
-
Flores I.B., and Himma K.E.. 2013. “Introduction,” in I.B. Flores and K.E. Himma (eds.), Law, Liberty, and the Rule of Law (Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York, London: Springer): 1–10.
-
Goodall K., , Malloch M. and B. Munro. 2012. “Social and legal transitions and criminalisation,” in K. Goodall, M. Malloch and B. Munro (eds.), Building Justice in Post-Transition Europe? Processes of criminalisation within Central and Eastern European societies (London: Routledge): 3–21.
-
Gosztonyi G.2005. “Crime as the Cost of Transition – A Social Policy Perspective: The Blind Hole of the European Union,” in Z. Kanduč (ed.), Kriminaliteta, družbeno nadzorstvo in postmodernizacijski procesi (Ljubljana: Inštitut za kriminologijo pri Pravni fakulteti v Ljubljani): 263–276.
-
Harteveld E., , van der Meer T., , and De Vries C. E.. 2013. “ In Europe we trust? Exploring three logics of trust in the European Union,” European Union Politics 14(4): 542–565.
-
Jovanović M.N.2013. “ Was European integration nice while it lasted?” Journal of European Integration 28(1): 1–36.
-
Jovanović M.N., and Damnjanović J.. 2013. “ eu Eastern Enlargement: Economic Effects on New Members 2000~2012,” Journal of Economic Integration 29(2): 201–243.
-
Kanduč Z.2013. Politika, pravo, ekonomija in kriminal: kriminološke refleksije postomoderne družbe in culture (Ljubljana: Inštitut za kriminologijo).
-
Kotar. T. 2009. “Slovenia,” in L. Stan (ed.), Transitional Justice in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union: Reckoning with the Communist Past: 1 (New York: Routledge): 200–220.
-
Letki N., and Evans G.. 2005. “ Endogenizing social trust: Democratization in East-Central Europe,” British Journal of Political Science 35(3): 515–529.
-
Mishler W., and Rose R.1997. “ Trust, distrust and scepticism: Popular evaluations of civil and political institutions in post-Communist societies,” The Journal of Politics, 59(2): 418–51.
-
Nardulli P. F., , Peyton B., and Bajjalieh J.. 2013. “ Conceptualizing and Measuring Rule of Law Constructs, 1850–2010,” Journal of Law and Courts 1(1): 139–192.
-
Nuotio K.2014. “Between denial and recognition: Criminal law and cultural diversity,” in W. Kymlicka, C. Lernestedt and M. Matravers (eds.), Criminal Law and Cultural Diversity (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 15–46.
-
Peršak N.2007. Criminalising Harmful Conduct: The Harm Principle, its Limits and Continental Counterparts (New York: Springer).
-
———. 2011. “Managing insecurities and expectations: Social trust and judiciary in transition,” Shaken Order: Authority and Social Trust in Post-Communist Societies (Case studies in Law) – cas Working Paper Series 4: 3–33.
-
———. 2012. “Building justice through criminal law: issues of criminalisation and trust,” in K. Goodall, M. Malloch and B. Munro (eds.), Building Justice in Post-Transition Europe? Processes of Criminalisation within Central and Eastern European Societies (London: Routledge): 43–55.
-
———. 2014. “Shared standards of justice: towards normative indicators of judicial legitimacy at eu level,” in L. Pauwels and G. Vermeulen (eds.), Update in de criminologie vii: Actuele ontwikkelingen inzake eu-justitiebeleid, cannabisbeleid, misdaad en straf, jongeren en jeugdzorg, internationale vrede, veiligheid en gerechtigheid, gewelddadig extremisme & private veiligheid en zelfregulering (Antwerpen, Apeldoorn, Portland: Maklu): 45–65.
-
Peršak N., , and Štrus J.. 2014. “Legitimacy and trust-related issues of judiciary: New challenges for Europe,” in N. Peršak (ed.), Legitimacy and Trust in Criminal Law, Policy and Justice (Farnham, Burlington: Ashgate): 89–110.
-
Reding V.2012. Speech at the European Parliament. 12 September 2012, <http://www.europarl.europa.eu/ep-live/en/plenary/video?debate=1347455074438> (accessed on 9 December 2012).
-
———. 2013. “The eu and the Rule of Law – What next?” (press release). <http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_speech-13-677_en.htm> (accessed on 20 October 2014).
-
Rose-Ackerman S.2001. “ Trust and Honesty in Post-Socialist Societies,” Kyklos 54(2/3): 415–444.
-
Slavov A.2011. “Challenges to constitutional supremacy in a new democracy: A critical study of Bulgaria,” Shaken Order: Authority and Social Trust in Post-Communist Societies (Case studies in Law) – cas Working Paper Series 4: 3–30.
-
Stoeckel F.2012. “ Ambivalent or indifferent? Reconsidering the structure of eu public opinion,” European Union Politics 14(1): 23–45.
-
Tamanaha B.Z.2004. On the Rule of Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
-
Taylor Hamara C.2013. “The concept of the rule of law,” in I.B. Flores and K.E. Himma (eds.), Law, Liberty, and the Rule of Law (Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York, London: Springer): 11–26.
-
Toshkov D., , Kortenska E., , Dimitrova A., and A. Fagan. 2014. “The ‘old’ and the ‘new’ Europeans: Analyses of public opinion on eu enlargement in review,” in maxcap Working Paper Series 2, April 2014.
-
Tyler T. R.2003. “ Procedural justice, legitimacy, and the effective rule of law,” Crime and Justice: A Review of Research 30: 283–357.
-
———. 2009. “ Legitimacy and compliance: The benefits of self-regulation,” Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 7(1): 307–359.
-
———. (ed.). 2012. Legitimacy and Criminal Justice: International Perspectives (New York: Russell Sage Foundation).
-
Vermeulen G.2014. “Flaws and contradictions in the mutual trust and recognition discourse: Casting a shadow on the legitimacy of eu criminal policy making and judicial cooperation in criminal matters?” in N. Peršak (ed.), Legitimacy and Trust in Criminal Law, Policy and Justice: Norms, Procedures, Outcomes (Farnham, Burlington: Ashgate): 153–175.
-
Waldron J.2002. “ Is the rule of law an essentially contested concept (in Florida)?” Law and Philosophy 21: 137–164.
-
———. 2008. “ The concept and the rule of law,” nyu Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series, Working Paper no. 08-50: 1–67.
-
Wolff S.2013. “ The rule of law in the Area of freedom, security and justice: Monitoring at home what the European Union preaches abroad,” Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 5: 119–131.
-
7
In June 2014, only 6% of Slovenian respondents trusted the national parliament, 8% trusted the government, and 37% of those asked replied that they trust the eu (Eurobarometer 2014).
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 548 | 74 | 7 |
| Full Text Views | 205 | 3 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 49 | 3 | 0 |
Rule of Law and Institutional Legitimacy: Challenges of Transition, Challenges of Europe
In: Southeastern EuropeSearch for other papers by Prof. dr. Nina Peršak in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Recent European events have revealed that some eu Member States, including some South Eastern European (see) States, still struggle with the rule of law. While certain rule of law challenges may be due to past legacies and insufficient (or insufficiently successful) transitions, others may be the result of the transition itself and of contemporary socio-economic problems that are experienced across Europe. This article will address the state of the rule of law in see, reflecting first on some pre-, mid-, and post-transition problems relevant for the rule of law in these countries. Next, it will address the legal and socio-psychological impact of the challenges posed by the mentioned problems, connecting the (mis)trust that can be observed on several levels (internally and externally) with the rule of law, thus demonstrating that mistrust as such has social as well as legal consequences. If trust (e.g. in the effectiveness of the rule of law safeguards or in those who are entrusted with safeguarding it) is lacking, this represents a problem not only for the Member State (e.g. for the functioning and perceived legitimacy of its judicial system) in question, but also for the eu (e.g. for the judicial cooperation in criminal matters). Lastly, the article will examine the eu’s perspective on rule of law, drawing on the recent eu Framework to Strengthen the Rule of Law, which aims to ensure an effective and coherent protection of the rule of law in all Member States, as well as on some other eu documents that may, in our view, help address the current challenges in European rule of law.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 548 | 74 | 7 |
| Full Text Views | 205 | 3 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 49 | 3 | 0 |
