Toward the New Testament Canon as Fourth-Century Invention
The Scriptural List of Athanasius and Its Reverberations
In: Religion and TheologySearch for other papers by Robert D. Heaton in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Scholarship on the New Testament canon regularly relies on criterial and reception-historical methodologies to antedate the Christian scriptural collection well before its first advocacy as a “rule” of scripture in the 39th Festal Letter of Athanasius of Alexandria (367 CE). Pushing back against these narratives and associated tendencies, this article prefers a functional or forensic approach to the institution of a twenty-seven-book New Testament and highlights evidence demonstrating how the Athanasian episcopal canon was amplified, amended, and accepted in the Christian East and West in the decades following its promulgation. Against suggestions that the canon existed as early as the second century, this handling of data on the New Testament, a scriptural instrument set forth with authoritative and exclusionary intentions, fits the guidelines of creative discourse and historical redescription so as to credit Athanasius, in the fourth century, as the inventor of the canon regnant into the present day. Among other foci, tracing the fortunes of a subcanonical category of books shows the potential for new histories of familiar canonical evidence that may ensue, especially those that plumb the possibility of dissent to the Athanasian scriptural boundaries or augment our awareness of the place and value of such an established standard within institutional, monastic, academic, imperial, and even so-called heretical contexts in and beyond the fourth century.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Adler, Yonatan. The Origins of Judaism: An Archaeological-Historical Reappraisal. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2022.
-
Aragione, Gabrielle, Eric Junod, and Enrico Norelli, eds. Le canon du Nouveau Testament: Regards nouveaux sur l’histoire de sa formation. Le monde de la Bible 54. Genève: Labor et Fides, 2005.
-
Armstrong, Jonathan J. “Victorinus of Pettau as the Author of the Canon Muratori.” Vigiliae Christianae 62, no. 1 (2008): 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1163/157007208X255099.
-
Arnold-Baker, Charles. “Damasus, St. (303–384).” In idem, The Companion to British History. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2001.
-
Asale, Bruk A. “The Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church Canon of the Scriptures: Neither Open nor Closed.” The Bible Translator 67, no. 2 (2016): 202–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/2051677016651486.
-
Bauer, Stefan. The Invention of Papal History: Onofrio Panvinio between Renaissance and Catholic Reform. Oxford–Warburg Studies. Oxford; New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2020.
-
Batovici, Dan. “The Apostolic Fathers in Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Alexandrinus.” Biblica 97, no. 4 (2016): 581–605. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44785075.
-
Brakke, David. Athanasius and the Politics of Asceticism. Oxford Early Christian Studies. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.
-
Brakke, David. “The Form and Function of the Vienna Incipit List: Shenoute among the Christian Authors of Late Antiquity.” Pages 153–175 in The Rediscovery of Shenoute: Studies in Honor of Stephen Emmel. Edited by Anne Boud’hors, David Brakke, Andrew Todd Crislip, and Samuel Moawad. Orientalia Lovaniensia analecta 310. Leuven: Peeters, 2022.
-
Brakke, David. “A New Fragment of Athanasius’s Thirty-Ninth Festal Letter: Heresy, Apocrypha, and the Canon.” Harvard Theological Review 103, no. 1 (2010): 47–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017816009990307
-
Brakke, David. “Scriptural Practices in Early Christianity: Towards a New History of the New Testament Canon.” Pages 263–280 in Invention, Rewriting, Usurpation: Discursive Fights over Religious Tradition in Antiquity. Edited by Jörg Ulrich, Anders-Christian Jacobsen, and David Brakke. Berlin: Peter Lang, 2012.
-
Brakke, David, and David M. Gwynn. The Festal Letters of Athanasius of Alexandria, with the Festal Index and the Historia Acephala. Texts Translated for Historians. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2023.
-
Camplani, Alberto, intro., trans., and notes. Atanasio di Alessandria: Lettere Festali e Anonimo: Indice delle Lettere Festali. Letture cristiane del primo millennio 34. Milan: Paoline, 2003.
-
Collins, John J. The Invention of Judaism: Torah and Jewish Identity from Deuteronomy to Paul. Oakland, CA: University of California Press, 2017.
-
Demacopoulos, George E. The Invention of Peter: Apostolic Discourse and Papal Authority in Late Antiquity. Divinations: Rereading Late Ancient Religion. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2013.
-
Ehrman, Bart D. “The New Testament Canon of Didymus the Blind.” Vigiliae Christianae 37, no. 1 (1983): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/1583151.
-
Eusebius of Caesarea. The History of the Church: A New Translation. Translated by Jeremy M. Schott. Oakland, CA: University of California Press, 2019.
-
Gallagher, Edmon L. “Jerome’s Prologus Galeatus and the OT Canon of North Africa.” Pages 99–106 in Studia Patristica. Vol. 69. Papers Presented at the Sixteenth International Conference on Patristic Studies Held in Oxford 2011. Volume 17, Latin Writers. Nachleben. Edited by Markus Vinzent. Leuven: Peeters, 2013.
-
Gallagher, Edmon L. “The Old Testament ‘Apocrypha’ in Jerome’s Canonical Theory.” Journal of Early Christian Studies 20, no. 2 (Summer 2012): 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1353/earl.2012.0016.
-
Gallagher, Edmon L., and John D. Meade. The Biblical Canon Lists from Early Christianity: Texts and Analysis. Oxford; New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2017.
-
Gamble, Harry. “Codex Sinaiticus in Its Fourth Century Setting.” Pages 3–18 in Codex Sinaiticus: New Perspectives on the Ancient Biblical Manuscript. Edited by Scot McKendrick, David Parker, Amy Myshrall, and Cillian O’Hogan. London: The British Library, 2015.
-
Gamble, Harry Y. The New Testament Canon: Its Meaning and Making. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press, 1985.
-
Goulder, Michael D. “Did Peter Ever Go to Rome?” Scottish Journal of Theology 57, no. 4 (2004): 377–396. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0036930604000316.
-
Gwynn, David M. Athanasius of Alexandria: Bishop, Theologian, Ascetic, Father. Christian Theology in Context. Oxford; New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2012.
-
Hahneman, Geoffrey Mark. “The Muratorian Fragment and the Origins of the New Testament Canon.” Pages 405–415 in The Canon Debate. Edited by Lee Martin McDonald and James A. Sanders. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 2002.
-
Heaton, Robert D. The Shepherd of Hermas as Scriptura Non Grata: From Early Popularity to Exclusion from the New Testament Canon. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2023.
-
Howorth, H.H. “The Decretal of Damasus.” Journal of Theological Studies 14, no. 55 (April 1913): 321–337. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23947342.
-
Jefford, Clayton N. “Power and Tradition in Apostolic Constitutions 7.” Pages 62–84 in Sacred Scripture and Secular Struggles. The Bible in Ancient Christianity 9. Edited by David Vincent Meconi. Leiden; Boston, MA: Brill, 2015.
-
Junod, Eric. “D’Eusèbe de Césarée à Athanase d’Alexandrie en passant par Cyrille de Jérusalem: De la construction savante du Nouveau Testament à la clôture ecclésiastique du canon.” Pages 169–195 in Le canon du Nouveau Testament: Regards nouveaux sur l’histoire de sa formation. Edited by Gabrielle Aragione, Eric Junod, and Enrico Norelli. Le monde de la Bible 54. Genève: Labor et Fides, 2005.
-
Lanier, Gregory R. “The Four-Fold Gospel Collection.” Pages 229–250 in Canon Formation: Tracing the Role of Sub-Collections in the Biblical Canon. Edited by W. Edward Glenny and Darian R. Lockett. London: T&T Clark, 2023.
-
Lefort, Louis-Theophile. “Théodore de Tabennese et la Lettre Pascale de St-Athanase sur le Canon de la Bible.” Le Muséon 29 (1910): 205–216. https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=njp.32101073499947;view=1up;seq=209.
-
Mali, Franz. “Le Canon du Nouveau Testament chez les Auteurs Syriaques.” Pages 269–282 in Le canon du Nouveau Testament: Regards nouveaux sur l’histoire de sa formation. Edited by Gabrielle Aragione, Eric Junod, and Enrico Norelli. Le monde de la Bible 54. Genève: Labor et Fides, 2005.
-
Markschies, Christoph. Christian Theology and Its Institutions in the Early Roman Empire: Prolegomena to a History of Early Christian Theology. Translated by Wayne Coppins. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2015.
-
Martin, Annik, and Micheline Albert, trans. and ed. Histoire « Acéphale » et Index Syriaque des Lettres Festales d’Athanase d’Alexandrie. Sources Chrétiennes 317. Paris: Les Éditions du Cerf, 1985.
-
McDonald, Lee Martin. “Forming Christian Scriptures as a Biblical Canon.” Pages 121–144 in Ancient Jewish and Christian Scriptures: New Developments in Canon Controversy. Edited by John J. Collins, Craig A. Evans, and Lee Martin McDonald. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2020.
-
McDonald, Lee Martin. “Identifying Scripture and Canon in the Early Church: The Criteria Question.” Pages 416–439 in The Canon Debate. Edited by Lee Martin McDonald and James A. Sanders. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 2002.
-
McDonald, Lee Martin. The Formation of the Biblical Canon: Volume 2. The New Testament: Its Authority and Canonicity. London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2017.
-
McDonald, Lee Martin, and James A. Sanders, eds. The Canon Debate. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 2002.
-
McKendrick, Scot, David Parker, Amy Myshrall, and Cillian O’Hogan, eds. Codex Sinaiticus: New Perspectives on the Ancient Biblical Manuscript. London: The British Library, 2015.
-
Metzger, Bruce M. The Canon of the New Testament: Its Origin, Development, and Significance. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987.
-
Nienhuis, David R., and Robert W. Wall. Reading the Epistles of James, Peter, John & Jude as Scripture: The Shaping & Shape of a Canonical Collection. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2013.
-
Osiek, Carolyn. The Shepherd of Hermas: A Commentary. Hermeneia. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1999.
-
Parker, David. “The Transcription and Reconstruction of Codex Sinaiticus.” Pages 279–293 in Codex Sinaiticus: New Perspectives on the Ancient Biblical Manuscript. Edited by Scot McKendrick, David Parker, Amy Myshrall, and Cillian O’Hogan. London: The British Library, 2015.
-
Riedel, Wilhelm, and W.E. Crum. The Canons of Athanasius of Alexandria: The Arabic and Coptic Versions. Oxford: Williams and Norgate, 1904. https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=hvd.32044079406062;view=1up;seq=13.
-
Robbins, Gregory Allen. “Eusebius’ Lexicon of ‘Canonicity.’” Pages 134–141 in Studia Patristica. Vol. 25. Papers presented to the Eleventh International Conference on Patristic Studies held in Oxford 1991. 2: Biblica et Apocrypha, Orientalia, Ascetica. Edited by Elizabeth A. Livingstone. Leuven: Peeters, 1993.
-
Robbins, Gregory Allen. “‘Fifty Copies of the Sacred Writings’ (VC 4.36): Entire Bibles or Gospel Books?” Pages 91–98 in Studia Patristica. Vol. 19. Papers presented at the Tenth International Conference on Patristic Studies held in Oxford 1987. Historica, Theologica, Gnostica, Biblica et Apocrypha. Edited by Elizabeth A. Livingstone. Leuven: Peeters, 1989.
-
Robbins, Gregory Allen. “PERI TŌN ENDIATHĒKŌN GRAPHŌN: Eusebius and the Formation of the Christian Bible.” Ph.D. diss., Duke University, 1986.
-
Rothschild, Clare K. The Muratorian Fragment: Text, Translation, Commentary. Studien und Texte zu Antike und Christentum 132. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2022.
-
Schachterle, Joshua. John Cassian and the Creation of Monastic Subjectivity. Sheffield, UK: Equinox, forthcoming.
-
Schnabel, Eckhard J. “The Muratorian Fragment: The State of Research.” Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 57, no. 2 (2014): 231–264. https://www.etsjets.org/files/JETS-PDFs/57/57-2/JETS_57-2_231-64_Schnabel.pdf
-
Silver, Nate. The Signal and the Noise: Why So Many Predictions Fail – But Some Don’t. New York, NY: The Penguin Press, 2012.
-
van den Heever, Gerhard. “Twilights of Greek and Roman Religions: Afterlives and Transformations – A Response.” Journal of Early Christian History 10, no. 2 (2020): 108–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/2222582X.2021.1928526.
-
White, Carolinne. The Correspondence (394–419) between Jerome and Augustine of Hippo. Studies in Bible and Early Christianity 23. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press, 1990.
-
Williams, Megan Hale. The Monk and the Book: Jerome and the Making of Christian Scholarship. Chicago, IL; London: University of Chicago Press, 2006.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 713 | 259 | 44 |
| Full Text Views | 129 | 20 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 279 | 42 | 2 |
Toward the New Testament Canon as Fourth-Century Invention
The Scriptural List of Athanasius and Its Reverberations
In: Religion and TheologySearch for other papers by Robert D. Heaton in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Scholarship on the New Testament canon regularly relies on criterial and reception-historical methodologies to antedate the Christian scriptural collection well before its first advocacy as a “rule” of scripture in the 39th Festal Letter of Athanasius of Alexandria (367 CE). Pushing back against these narratives and associated tendencies, this article prefers a functional or forensic approach to the institution of a twenty-seven-book New Testament and highlights evidence demonstrating how the Athanasian episcopal canon was amplified, amended, and accepted in the Christian East and West in the decades following its promulgation. Against suggestions that the canon existed as early as the second century, this handling of data on the New Testament, a scriptural instrument set forth with authoritative and exclusionary intentions, fits the guidelines of creative discourse and historical redescription so as to credit Athanasius, in the fourth century, as the inventor of the canon regnant into the present day. Among other foci, tracing the fortunes of a subcanonical category of books shows the potential for new histories of familiar canonical evidence that may ensue, especially those that plumb the possibility of dissent to the Athanasian scriptural boundaries or augment our awareness of the place and value of such an established standard within institutional, monastic, academic, imperial, and even so-called heretical contexts in and beyond the fourth century.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 713 | 259 | 44 |
| Full Text Views | 129 | 20 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 279 | 42 | 2 |
