Christianity from its inception has expressed a tension between imperium and sacerdotium; after the Reformation, this tension has only been aggravated. Avowals of religious freedom thereafter have often rightly insisted on the capacity of spiritual communities to invoke limits for the state. This is readily apparent in South Africa, past and present. However, scholarship has shown that “religious liberty” has an ambiguous function, such as its privatisation of belief, based on a liberalised notion of “negative” freedom that allows the state to grant the “right” to “belief,” while simultaneously rendering belief a purely private or “otherworldly” affair. This is traceable to overly-Protestant conceptions of “religion” and “freedom” that are pervasive – including South Africa. From a theological perspective, I argue that this conception of “religious freedom” might sit in tension with aspects of ecclesiology and that the discursive deployment of “religious freedom” should therefore be engaged critically.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Amien, Waheeda. “Postapartheid Treatment of Religious Freedom in South Africa.” Pages 179–193 in The Politics of Religious Freedom. Edited by Winnifred Fallers Sullivan, Elizabeth Shakman Hurd, Saba Mahmood, and Peter G. Danchin. Chicago, IL; London: University of Chicago Press, 2015. doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226248646.003.0019.
Asad, Talal. “Thinking about Religion, Belief, and Politics.” Pages 36–57 in The Cambridge Companion to Religious Studies. Edited by Robert A. Orsi. Cambridge Companions to Religion. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Asad, Talal. Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam. Baltimore, MD: London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993.
Beaman, Lori G. “Beyond Establishment.” Pages 207–219 in The Politics of Religious Freedom. Edited by Winnifred Fallers Sullivan, Elizabeth Shakman Hurd, Saba Mahmood, and Peter G. Danchin. Chicago, IL; London: University of Chicago Press, 2015. doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226248646.003.0021.
Benveniste, Émile. Le vocabulaire des institutions indo-européennes, 2: pouvoir, droit, religion. Le sens commun. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit, 1969.
Berlin, Isaiah. “Two Concepts of Liberty.” Pages 169–178 in idem, Liberty: Incorporating Four Essays on Liberty. Edited by Henry Hardy. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2002. doi.org/10.1093/019924989X.003.0004.
Bertelloni, Francisco. “Marsilius of Padua.” Pages 411–420 in A Companion to Philosophy in the Middle Ages. Edited by Jorge J.E. Gracia and Timothy B. Noone. Blackwell Companions to Philosophy. Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2002. doi.org/10.1002/9780470996669.ch79.
Boureau, Alain. “Des politiques tirées de l’Écriture. Byzance et l’Occident.” Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales 55, no. 4 (2000): 879–887. doi.org/10.3406/ahess.2000.279887.
Cavanaugh, William T. “Are we Free not to Be a Religion? The Ambivalence of Religious Freedom.” Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology 23, no. 1 (2014): 7–21. doi.org/10.1177/106385121402300.
Coleman, Janet. “Ockham’s Right Reason and the Genesis of the Political as ‘Absolutist’.” History of Political Thought 20, no. 1 (1999): 35–64.
Dagron, Gilbert. “Orient-occident: césaropapisme et théorie des deux pouvoirs face á la modernité.” Revue d’éthique et de théologie morale 227 (2003): 143–157.
Danchin, Peter G. “Religious Freedom in the Panopticon of Enlightenment Rationality.” Pages 240–252 in The Politics of Religious Freedom. Edited by Winnifred Fallers Sullivan, Elizabeth Shakman Hurd, Saba Mahmood, and Peter G. Danchin. Chicago, IL; London: University of Chicago Press, 2015. doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226248646.003.0024.
De Gruchy, John. “The Church-State Confrontation: Correspondence and Statements February–April 1988.” Journal of Theology for Southern Africa 63 (1988): 68–87.
De Wit, Theo W.A. “Laïcité: French Secularism and the Turn to a Postsecular Society.” Telos 167 (2014): 143–161. doi.org/10.3817/0614167143.
du Toit, Cornel. “Religious Freedom and Human Rights in South Africa After 1996: Responses and Challenges.” Brigham Young University Law Review 2006, no. 3 (2006): 677–698. https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview/vol2006/iss3/3.
Freedom of Religion South Africa. https://forsa.org.za/. Cited 3 June 2022.
Gelasius I. On Spiritual and Temporal Power. No Pages. Cited 13 June 2017. https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/source/gelasius1.asp.
Greenberg, Udi. “Is Religious Freedom Protestant? On the History of a Critical Idea.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 88, no. 1 (2020): 74–91. doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfz103.
Gregory, Brad S. The Unintended Reformation: How Religious Revolution Secularized Society. Cambridge, MA; London: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2012.
Hackett, Rosalind I.J. “Traditional, African, Religious, Freedom?” Pages 89–98 in The Politics of Religious Freedom. Edited by Winnifred Fallers Sullivan, Elizabeth Shakman Hurd, Saba Mahmood, and Peter G. Danchin. Chicago, IL; London: University of Chicago Press, 2015. doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226248646.003.0009.
Hart, David Bentley. That All Shall Be Saved: Heaven, Hell, and Universal Salvation. New Haven, CT; London: Yale University Press, 2019.
Hauerwas, Stanley. “Freedom of Religion: A Subtle Temptation.” Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal 72, no. 2–3 (1989): 317–339. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41178480.
Hill, Geoffrey. “The Argument of the Masque 19 (Scenes from Comus).” Pages 421–430 in Broken Hierarchies: Poems 1952–2012. Edited by Kenneth Haynes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
Hurd, Elizabeth Shakman. “Believing in Religious Freedom.” Pages 45–56 in The Politics of Religious Freedom. Edited by Winnifred Fallers Sullivan, Elizabeth Shakman Hurd, Saba Mahmood, and Peter G. Danchin. Chicago, IL; London: University of Chicago Press, 2015. doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226248646.003.0005.
Hurd, Elizabeth Shakman. Beyond Religious Freedom: The New Global Politics of Religion. Princeton, NJ; Woodstock: Princeton University Press, 2015.
Kessler, Sanford. “John Locke’s Legacy of Religious Freedom.” Polity 17, No. 3 (Spring, 1985): 484–503. doi.org/10.2307/3234655.
Lohse, Bernhard. Martin Luther’s Theology: Its Historical and Systematic Development. Translated by Roy A. Harrisville. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2006.
Masuzawa, Tomoko. The Invention of World Religions: Or How European Universalism Was Preserved in the Language of Pluralism. Chicago, IL; London: Chicago University Press, 2005.
McGuckin, John A. “The Legacy of the 13th Apostle: Origins of The East Christian Conceptions of Church and State Relation.” St Vladimir’s Theological Quarterly 47, no. 3–4 (2003): 251–288.
Michéa, Jean-Claude. The Realm of Lesser Evil: An Essay on Liberal Civilization. Translated by David Fernbach. Cambridge; Malden, MA: Polity, 2009.
Milbank, John, and Adrian Pabst. The Politics of Virtue: Post-Liberalism and the Human Future. Future Perfect: Images of the Time to Come in Philosophy, Politics and Cultural Studies. London; New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield, 2016.
Milbank, John. “Against Human Rights: Liberty in the Western Tradition.” Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 1, no. 1 (2012): 203–234. doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwr014.
Milbank, John. “The End of Religious Freedom and the Return of Religious Influence.” ABC online, Religion & Ethics. 13 March 2017. https://www.abc.net.au/religion/the-decline-of-religious-freedom-and-the-return-of-religious-inf/10095982.
Moosa, Ebrahim. “Tensions in Legal and Religious Values in the 1996 South African Constitution.” Pages 121–135 in Beyond Rights Talk and Culture Talk: Comparative Essays on the Politics of Rights and Culture. Edited by Mahmood Mamdani. Cape Town: David Philips Publishers, 2000.
Pickstock, C.J.C. “The Ritual Birth of Sense.” Telos 2013, no. 162 (2013): 29–55. doi.org/ 10.3817/0313162029.
Rose, Gillian. Mourning Becomes Law: Philosophy and Representation. Cambridge; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Ruel, Malcolm. “Christians as Believers.” Pages 9–31 in Religious Organization and Religious Experience. Edited by John Davis. London: Academic Press, 1982.
Schindler, David L. “Editorial: The Repressive Logic of Liberal Rights: Religious Freedom, Contraceptives, and the ‘Phony’ Argument of the New York Times.” Communio 38, no. 4 (2011): 523–547. https://www.communio-icr.com/files/Schindler_Repressive_Logic_of_Liberal_Rights.pdf.
Steiner, Franz B. “On the Process of Civilisation.” Pages 122–128 in idem, Selected Writings, volume 2: Orientpolitik, Value, and Civilization. Edited and introduced by Jeremy Adler and Richard Fardon. Methodology and History in Anthropology 3. New York, NY; Oxford: Berghahn Books, 1999.
Sullivan, Winnifred Fallers. “Religious Freedom and the Rule of Law: A Modernist Myth in a Postmodern World?” Pages 596–614 in Religion im kulturellen Diskurs / Religion in Cultural Discourse: Essays in Honor of Hans G. Kippenberg on the Occasion of His 65th Birthday. Edited by Brigitte Luchesi and Kocku von Stuckrad. Religionsgeschichtliche Versuche und Vorarbeiten 52. Berlin; New York, NY: Walter de Gruyter, 2004.
Sullivan, Winnifred Fallers. “The World That Smith Made.” Pages 231–239 in The Politics of Religious Freedom. Edited by Winnifred Fallers Sullivan, Elizabeth Shakman Hurd, Saba Mahmood, and Peter G. Danchin. Chicago, IL; London: University of Chicago Press, 2015. doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226248646.003.0023.
The South African Charter of Religious Rights and Freedoms and The South African Council for the Protection and Promotion of Religious Rights And Freedoms. https://www.strasbourgconsortium.org/content/blurb/files/South%20African%20Charter.pdf [cited 3 June 2022].
van der Vyver, Johan D. “Constitutional Perspective of Church-State Relations in South Africa.” Brigham Young University Law Review 1999, no. 2 (1999): 635–673. https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview/vol1999/iss2/8.
Villey, Michel. “La théologie de Thomas d’Aquin et la formation de l’État moderne.” Pages 31–49 in Théologie et droit dans la science politique de l’État moderne: Actes de la table ronde de Rome (12–14 Novembre 1987), Collection de l’École Française de Rome 147. Rome: École Française de Rome, 1991. www.persee.fr/doc/efr_0000-0000_1991_act_147_1_4160.
Vosloo, Robert. “The State of Exception and Religious Freedom: Revisiting the Church-State Confrontation Correspondence and Statements of 1988.” Studia Historiae Ecclesiasticae 34, no. 1 (2008): 193–210.
Ward, Graham. “The Myth of Secularism.” Telos 2014, no. 167 (2014): 162–179. doi.org/10.3817/0614167162.
Ward, Graham. Unbelievable: Why We Believe and Why We Don’t. London; New York, NY: I.B. Tauris, 2013.
Williams, Rowan. “Church and State.” Pages 137–140 in Dictionary of Ethics, Theology and Society. Edited by Paul Barry Clarke and Andrew Linzey. Abingdon; New York, NY: Routledge, 1996.
Williams, Rowan. “Politics and the Soul: A Reading of the City of God.” Milltown Studies 19–20 (1987): 55–72.
Williams, Rowan. Faith in the Public Square. London: Bloomsbury, 2012.
Williams, Rowan. On Christian Theology, Challenges in Contemporary Theology. Oxford; Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2000.
Yelle, Robert. “Imagining the Hebrew Republic: Christian Genealogies of Religious Freedom.” Pages 17–28 in The Politics of Religious Freedom. Edited by Winnifred Fallers Sullivan, Elizabeth Shakman Hurd, Saba Mahmood, and Peter G. Danchin. Chicago, IL; London: University of Chicago Press, 2015. doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226248646.003.0003.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 536 | 93 | 7 |
| Full Text Views | 15 | 3 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 30 | 6 | 0 |
Christianity from its inception has expressed a tension between imperium and sacerdotium; after the Reformation, this tension has only been aggravated. Avowals of religious freedom thereafter have often rightly insisted on the capacity of spiritual communities to invoke limits for the state. This is readily apparent in South Africa, past and present. However, scholarship has shown that “religious liberty” has an ambiguous function, such as its privatisation of belief, based on a liberalised notion of “negative” freedom that allows the state to grant the “right” to “belief,” while simultaneously rendering belief a purely private or “otherworldly” affair. This is traceable to overly-Protestant conceptions of “religion” and “freedom” that are pervasive – including South Africa. From a theological perspective, I argue that this conception of “religious freedom” might sit in tension with aspects of ecclesiology and that the discursive deployment of “religious freedom” should therefore be engaged critically.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 536 | 93 | 7 |
| Full Text Views | 15 | 3 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 30 | 6 | 0 |