Save

Manichaeology, Early Christianity, and Religious Identity

A Response and Reflection

In: Religion and Theology
Author:
Chris L. de Wet University of South Africa Department of Biblical and Ancient Studies South Africa Pretoria

Search for other papers by Chris L. de Wet in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2628-2013
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€36.93

Abstract

This article serves as a response to Johannes van Oort’s creative and erudite analysis of the status quaestionis and constitution of Manichaean studies, most aptly termed, “Manichaeology”. What I aim to achieve with this short study is a reflection and some suggestions on how the study of Manichaeology, in relation to early Christian studies, can assist us in better conceptualizing how we might understand religious identity in Late Antiquity. Several scholars of Manichaeism have made major strides in locating Manichaeism and early Christianity as what we might call proximate discursive formations. These discursive formations constantly overlap, constitute, construct and, indeed, deconstruct elements of shared religious identity in the late ancient world, and their interaction offers us a useful case study for developing a more cautious, nuanced, and considered approach to understanding religious identity during this period.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 291 52 1
Full Text Views 31 1 0
PDF Views & Downloads 59 2 0