The Problem with Sandra
Addressing the Unfortunate Consequences of Relational Ontological Personhood
In: Religion and TheologySearch for other papers by Stephen Milford in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
The orangutan, Sandra, has been legally granted the status of ‘non-human person.’ Although, a great victory for those who promote animal rights, this has raised questions about the contemporary approaches to personhood. Recent relational ontological shifts, evident in both secular and theological anthropology, risks unfortunate consequences. Like a snake eating its own tail, without proper circumspection, relational ontology is in danger of postulating a problematic circularity of persons creating persons out of nothing. This article explores these recent shifts, the possible pitfalls of relational ontology, and proposes certain theological desiderata.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Andrews, Kristin, Gary Comstock, G.K.D. Crozier, et al. “The Philosophers’ Brief on Chimpanzee Personhood.” ResearchGate, February 2018. Online: dx.doi.org/ 10.13140/RG.2.2.36267.95521.
-
Aristotle. Metaphysics, Volume I: Books 1–9. Translated by Hugh Tredennick. Loeb Classical Library 271. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1933. Online: http://data.perseus.org/texts/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0086.tlg025.perseus-eng1.
-
Asociación de funcionarios y abogados por los derechos de los animales y otro contra GBCA sobre amparo, EXPTE. A2174–2015/0, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, 21 October 2015.
-
Barth, Karl. Church Dogmatics. The Doctrine of Creation, Volume 3, Part 1: The Work of Creation. Translated by J.W. Edwards, O. Bussey, and H. Knight. Edited by G.W. Bromiley and T.F. Torrance. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1958.
-
Berkouwer, G.C. Man: The Image of God. Studies in Dogmatics. Translated by Dirk W. Jellema. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1962.
-
Brown, Warren S. “Cognitive Contributions to Soul.” Pages 99–125 in Whatever Happened to the Soul. Scientific and Theological Portraits of Human Nature. Edited by Warren S. Brown, Nancey Murphy, and H. Newton Malony. Theology and the Sciences. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1998.
-
Brümmer, Vincent. “Religious Belief and Personal Identity.” Neue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie 38, no. 2 (1996): 155–165. Online: doi.org/10.1515/nzst.1996.38.2.155.
-
Cooper, John W. Body, Soul, and Life Everlasting: Biblical Anthropology and the Monism-Dualism Debate. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2000.
-
Clough, David. “Not a Not-Animal: The Vocation to Be a Human Animal Creature.” Studies in Christian Ethics 26, no. 1 (2013): 4–17.
-
Dawber, Alistair. “Human Rights for Cats and Dogs: Spanish Town Council Votes Overwhelmingly in Favour of Defining Pets as ‘Non-Human Residents.’ ” Independent, 22 July 2015. Online: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/human-rights-cats-and-dogs-spanish-town-council-votes-overwhelmingly-favour-defining-pets-non-human-residents-10408546.html
-
Engelhardt, H. Tristram. “Beginnings of Personhood: Philosophical Considerations.” Perkins Journal 27, no. 1 (1973): 20–27.
-
Grant, C. David. “Personal and Impersonal Concepts of God: A Tension within Contemporary Christian Theology.” Encounter 49, no. 2 (1988): 79–91.
-
Grenz, Stanley J. The Social God and the Relational Self: A Trinitarian Theology of the Imago Dei. Louisville, KY; London: Westminster John Knox, 2007.
-
Gunton, Colin E. The One, the Three and the Many: God, Creation and the Culture of Modernity. The 1992 Bampton Lectures. Cambridge; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
-
Hall, Douglas John. Imaging God: Dominion as Stewardship. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1986.
-
Hellegers, Andre E. “The Beginnings of Personhood: Medical Considerations.” Perkins Journal 27, no. 1 (1973): 11–15.
-
Hoekema, Anthony A. Created in God’s Image. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1986.
-
Hudson, Rosalie. “Dementia and Personhood: A Living Death or Alive in God?” Colloquium 36, no. 2 (2004): 123–142.
-
Kelsey, David H. Eccentric Existence: A Theological Anthropology. 2 vols. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox, 2009.
-
Kelsey, David H. “Personal Bodies: A Theological Anthropological Proposal.” Pages 139–158 in Personal Identity in Theological Perspective. Edited by Richard Lints, Michael S. Horton, and Mark R. Talbot. Grand Rapids, MI; Cambridge: Eerdmans, 2006.
-
Kelsey, David H. “Review of F. LeRon Shults, Reforming Theological Anthropology: After the Philosophical Turn to Relationality.” Interpretation 59, no. 4 (2005): 424. Online: doi.org/10.1177/002096430505900414.
-
Kelsey, David H. “Response to the Symposium on Eccentric Existence.” Modern Theology 27, no. 1 (2011): 72–86. Online: doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0025.2010.01655.x.
-
Kelsey, David H. “The Human Creature.” Pages 121–139 in The Oxford Handbook of Systematic Theology. Edited by John Webster, Kathryn Tanner, and Ian Torrance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
-
Kelsey, David H. “Two Theologies of Death: Anthropological Gleanings.” Modern Theology 13, no. 3 (1997): 347–370. Online: doi.org/10.1111/1468-0025.00044.
-
Kosman, L.A. “Aristotle’s Definition of Motion.” Phronesis 14, no. 1 (1969): 40–62. Online: doi.org/10.1163/156852869X00037.
-
Macmurray, John. The Form of the Personal. Vol. 2, Persons in Relation. The Gifford Lectures 1954. Introduction by Frank G. Kirkpatrick. London: Faber & Faber, 1995.
-
McFadyen, Alistair Iain. The Call to Personhood: A Christian Theory of the Individual in Social Relationships. Cambridge; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
-
McFarland, Ian A. Difference & Identity: A Theological Anthropology. Cleveland, OH: Pilgrim, 2001.
-
Mikhailovsky, Alexander. “The Anthropology of Hypostasis. On the Question of the Genealogy of the Subject.” The International Journal of Orthodox Theology 2, no. 3 (2011): 144–166. Online: https://www.orthodox-theology.com/media/PDF/IJOT3-2011/Mikhailovsky-Hypostasis.pdf.
-
Milford, Stephen R. Eccentricity in Anthropology: David H. Kelsey’s Anthropological Formula as a Way Out of the Substantive-Relational Imago Dei Debate. Princeton Theological Monograph Series 238. Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2019.
-
Milford, Stephen R. “Substantive or Relational? The Counterfeit Choice in the Imago Dei Debate.” McMaster Journal of Theology and Ministry 20 (2018–2019): 84–117. Online: https://www.mcmaster.ca/mjtm/documents/Volume20/20.MJTM.84-117-Milford.pdf
-
Moltmann, Jürgen. The Trinity and the Kingdom of God: The Doctrine of God. London: SCM Press, 1981.
-
Nonhuman Rights Project. Online: https://www.nonhumanrights.org/.
-
Pannenberg, Wolfhart. Anthropology in Theological Perspective. Translated by Matthew J. O’Connell. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1999.
-
Pickstock, Catherine. “The One Story: A Critique of David Kelsey’s Theological Robotics.” Modern Theology 27, no. 1 (2011): 26–40. Online: doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0025.2010.01652.x.
-
Ricoeur, Paul. Oneself as Another. Translated by Kathleen Blamey. Chicago, IL; London: University of Chicago Press, 1992.
-
Roman, Valaria. “Argentina Grants an Orangutan Human-Like Rights.” Scientific American, 9 January 2015. Online: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/argentina-grants-an-orangutan-human-like-rights/.
-
Rudman, Stanley. Concepts of Persons and Christian Ethics. New Studies in Christian Ethics. Cambridge; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
-
Scott, Mark S.M. “God as Person: Karl Barth and Karl Rahner on Divine and Human Personhood.” Religious Studies and Theology 25, no. 2 (2006): 161–190. Online: doi.org/10.1558/rsth.2006.25.2.161.
-
Shults, F. LeRon. Reforming Theological Anthropology: After the Philosophical Turn to Relationality. Grand Rapids, MI; Cambridge: Eerdmans, 2003.
-
Shutte, Augustine. “What Makes Us Person.” Modern Theology 1, no. 1 (1984): 67–79. Online: doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0025.1984.tb00007.x.
-
Strawson, P.F. Individuals: An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics. London: Methuen, 1959.
-
Swinburne, Richard. The Coherence of Theism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.
-
Tännsjö, Torbjörn. Taking Life: Three Theories on the Ethics of Killing. Oxford; New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2015.
-
Torrance, Alan J. Persons in Communion: An Essay on Trinitarian Description and Human Participation with Special Reference to Volume One of Karl Barth’s Church Dogmatics. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1996.
-
Visala, Aku. “Imago Dei, Dualism, and Evolution: A Philosophical Defense of the Structural Image of God.” Zygon 49, no. 1 (2014): 101–120. Online: doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12063.
-
White, Vernon. Identity. Society and Church. London: SCM Press, 2002.
-
Witt, Charlotte. Ways of Being: Potentiality and Actuality in Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Ithaca, NY; London: Cornell University Press, 2003.
-
Zizioulas, John D. Being as Communion: Studies in Personhood and the Church. London: Darton, Longman & Todd, 1985.
-
Zizioulas, John D. “Human Capacity and Human Incapacity: A Theological Exploration of Personhood.” Scottish Journal of Theology 28, no. 5 (1975): 401–447. Online: doi.org/10.1017/S003693060003533X.
-
Zizioulas, John D. “On Being a Person: Towards and Ontology of Personhood.” Pages 33–46 in Persons, Divine and Human: King’s College Essays in Theological Anthropology. Edited by Christoph Schwöbel and Colin E. Gunton. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1991.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 545 | 102 | 6 |
| Full Text Views | 96 | 4 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 160 | 8 | 0 |
The Problem with Sandra
Addressing the Unfortunate Consequences of Relational Ontological Personhood
In: Religion and TheologySearch for other papers by Stephen Milford in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
The orangutan, Sandra, has been legally granted the status of ‘non-human person.’ Although, a great victory for those who promote animal rights, this has raised questions about the contemporary approaches to personhood. Recent relational ontological shifts, evident in both secular and theological anthropology, risks unfortunate consequences. Like a snake eating its own tail, without proper circumspection, relational ontology is in danger of postulating a problematic circularity of persons creating persons out of nothing. This article explores these recent shifts, the possible pitfalls of relational ontology, and proposes certain theological desiderata.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 545 | 102 | 6 |
| Full Text Views | 96 | 4 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 160 | 8 | 0 |
