While studies of minorities under the Fāṭimid caliph al-Ḥākim (r. 996–1021) have typically emphasized his treatment of Jews and Christians, this article explores the relatively neglected topic of his Sunnī Muslim subjects. During al-Ḥākim’s reign, Sunnīs found themselves in the unusual position of facing political marginalization, and tensions between Sunnīs and Ismāʿīlīs frequently escalated into violence. Al-Ḥākim’s evolving policies toward Sunnīs can be understood as attempts to resolve these recurrent sectarian clashes. Drawing on contemporary chronicles and the largely overlooked Maʿāṣim al-hudā of Ḥamīd al-Dīn al-Kirmānī, this paper identifies four distinct phases in al-Ḥākim’s policy: repression, toleration, syncretic integration, and a return to oppression. Special attention is given to the syncretic phase (1010–1016), during which al-Ḥākim pursued an ambitious program to reconcile sectarian divides through the public rehabilitation of Sunnī figures—most notably Abū Bakr—within Ismāʿīlī doctrine. Al-Kirmānī’s text offers valuable insight into this theological experiment, demonstrating the critical role of scholars in disseminating and defending challenges to extant sectarian frameworks. This case study thus complicates the category of minorityhood by challenging prevailing narratives of rigid sectarian binaries in medieval Islam and documenting a heretofore overlooked attempt to address sectarian violence in a premodern Islamic society.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Al-Anṭākī, Yaḥyā. Taʾrīkh al-Anṭākī. Edited by ʿUmar ʿAbd al-Salām Tadmurī. Tripoli, Lebanon: Jarrous Press, 1990.
Ibn al-Haytham, Abū Abd Allāh Jaʿfar ibn al-Aswad. Kitāb al-munāẓarāt. In The Advent of the Fāṭimids: a Contemporary Shīʿī Witness. Edited and translated by Wilferd Madelung and Paul Walker. London: IB Tauris, 2000.
Ibn Manṣūr al-Yaman, Jaʿfar. Kitāb al-kashf. Edited by Rudolf Strothmann. London: Oxford University Press, 1952.
Ibn Ṭāwūs, Aḥmad ibn Mūsā. Bināʾ al-maqāla al-Fāṭimīyya fī naqḍ al-risāla al-ʿuthmānīya. Edited by Alī al-ʿAdnān al-Ghurayfī. Beirut: Muʾassasat Āl al-Bayt li-Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth, 1991.
Ibn Taymiyya, Taqī al-Dīn. Minhāj al-sunna al-nabawiyya, Volume I. Edited by Muḥammad Rashād Sālim. Riyadh: 1967.
Al-Jāḥiẓ, Abū Uthmān ʿAmr al-Baṣrī. Al-ʿUthmāniyya. Edited by ʿAbd al-Salām Hārūn. Cairo: 1955.
Al-Kirmānī, Ḥamīd al-Dīn. Maʿāṣim al-hudā wa-l-iṣāba fī tafḍīl ʿAlī ʿalā al-ṣaḥāba. Special Collections, Institute of Ismāʿīlī Studies, London, UK. MSS 106, 107, 542, 724, 866, 1232, 1456.
Al-Kirmānī, Ḥamīd al-Dīn. Al-Maṣābīḥ fī ithbāt al-imāma. In Master of the Age: An Islamic Treatise on the Necessity of the Imamate, by Paul Walker. London: IB Tauris, 2007, ٩٥-١ (Ar.) and 35–127 (Eng.).
Al-Kirmānī, Ḥamīd al-Dīn. Al-Risāla al-kāfiya. In Majmūʿat rasāʾil al-Kirmānī. Edited by Muṣṭafā Ghālib. Beirut: al-Muʾassasa al-Jāmiʿiyya li-l-Dirāsāt wa-l-Nashr wa-l-Tawzīʿ, 1983, 148–182.
Al-Kirmānī, Ḥamīd al-Dīn. Risālat mabāsim al-bishārāt. In Majmūʿat rasāʾil al-Kirmānī. Edited by Muṣṭafā Ghālib. Beirut: al-Muʾassasa al-Jāmiʿiyya li-l-Dirāsāt wa-l-Nashr wa-l-Tawzīʿ, 1983, 113–133.
Al-Kirmānī, Ḥamīd al-Dīn. Tanbīh al-hādī wa-l-mustahdī. Edited by Husām Khuḍūr. Salamiya, Syria: Dār al-Ghadīr, 2019. Also Special Collections, Institute of Ismāʿīlī Studies, London, UK., MS 724.
Majdūʿ, Ismāʿīl. Fahrasat al-kutub wa-l-rasāʾil wa-li-man hiya min al-ʿulamāʾ wa-l-aʾimma wa-l-ḥudūd al-afāḍil. Edited by Alīnaqī Munzavī. Tehran: Chāpkhānah-i-Dānishgāh, 1966.
Al-Maqrīzī. Ittiʿāẓ al-ḥunafā bi-akhbār al-aʾimma al-khulafā. Edited by Ayman Fuʾād Sayyid. Cairo: National Library and Archives Press, 2016.
Al-Maqrīzī. Al-Mawāʿiẓ wa-l-iʿtibār bi-dhikr al-khiṭaṭ wa-l-āthār. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 1998.
Al-Naysābūrī, Aḥmad ibn Ibrāhīm. Kitāb ithbāt al-imāma. In Arzina Lalani, Degrees of Excellence : a Fāṭimid Treatise on Leadership in Islam. London: IB Tauris, 2010.
Al-Qāḍī al-Nuʿmān, Abū Ḥanīfa al-Tamīmī al-Maghribī. Asās al-taʾwīl. Edited by ʿĀrif Tāmir. Beirut: Dār al-Thaqāfa, 1960.
Al-Qāḍī al-Nuʿmān, Abū Ḥanīfa al-Tamīmī al-Maghribī. Ikhtilāf usūl al-madhāhib/The Disagreements of the Jurists: A Manual of Islamic Legal Theory. Edited by Devin J. Stewart. New York: New York University Press, 2015.
Aguade, Jorge. “Abū Rakwa.” In Actas del IV Coloquio Hispano-Tunecino. Edited by Manuela Marin. Madrid: Instituto Hispano-Arabe de Cultura, 1983: 9–28.
Asgari, Mehdi. “Maʿrefi Kitāb maʿāṣim al-hudā wa-l-iṣāba fī tafḍīl ʿAlī ʿalā al-ṣaḥāba athr Ḥamīd al-Dīn Kirmānī.” Nashriyat Mīrāth Shihāb 28, no. 107 (2023): 279–291.
Assaad, Sadik A. The Reign of al-Ḥākim Bi Amr Allāh (386/996–411/1021): A Political Study. Beirut: Arab Institute for Research and Pub., 1974.
Bianquis, Thierry. Damas et la Syrie sous la domination fatimide (359–486/969–1076), 2 vols. Damascus: Institut français de Damas, 1986 and 1989.
Bruhl, F. “Hind Bint ʿUtba.” In Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd ed. Leiden: Brill, 2005.
Canard, Marius. “Al-Anṭākī.” Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd Edition. Leiden: Brill, 2005.
Canard, Marius. “Al-Ḥākim bi-Amr Allāh.” Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd Edition. Leiden: Brill, 2005.
Daftary, Farhad. The Ismailis: Their History and Doctrines, 2nd edition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Dols, Michael. Majnun: The Madman in Medieval Islamic Society. Oxford: Clarendon, 1992.
Garrett, Timothy. “Islamic Sectarianism & Syncretism during the Reign of al-Hakim bi-Amr Allah: A Critical Edition and Study of Hamid al-Din al-Kirmani’s Maʿasim al-huda.” PhD diss., University of California, Los Angeles, 2024.
Goitein, S.D. A Mediterranean Society, Volume 2. Berkeley and Los Angeles: UC Press, 2000.
Halm, Heinz. The Fāṭimids and their Traditions of Learning. New York: IB Tauris, 1997.
Halm, Heinz. ‘Der Treuhänder Gottes: Die Edikte des Kalifen al-Ḥākim.’ Der Islām 63 (1986), 11–72.
Halm, Heinz. “Al-Walīd b. His̲h̲ām.” In Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd ed. Leiden: Brill, 2005.
Hamdani, Sumaiya. “The Dialectic of Power: Sunnī-Shīʿī Debates in Tenth-Century North Africa.” Studia Islamica 90, 2000, 5–21.
Von Hammer-Purgstall, Joseph. The History of the Assassins. Translated by Oswald Charles Wood. London: Smith & Elder, 1835.
Husayn, Nebil. Opposing the Imam: The Legacy of the Nawasib in Islamic Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.
Ibrahīmī-zādeh, Aḥmad. “Maʿāṣim al-Hudā Ḥamīd al-Dīn al-Kirmānī va muṭālaʿa-yi taṭbīqī-yi ān bā al-ʿUthmāniyya-yi Jāḥiẓ.” PhD diss., Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, 2024.
Ivanow, Wladmir. Ismāʿīlī Tradition Concerning the Rise of the Fāṭimids. London: Oxford University Press, 1942.
Jiwa, Shainool. “The Baghdad Manifesto (402/1011): A Re-Examination of Fāṭimid-Abbasid Rivalry.” In The Fāṭimid Caliphate: Diversity of Traditions. Edited by Farhad Daftary and Shainool Jiwa, 22–79. London: IB Tauris, 2018.
Kohlberg, Etan. “The Companions as Authorities,” in In Praise of the Few. Studies in Shiʿi Thought and History. Leiden: Brill, 2020, 133–149.
Kohlberg, Etan. “Imāmī Shīʿī Views on the Participants in the Battles of the Camel and Siffin,” in In Praise of the Few: Studies in Shiʿi Thought and History. Leiden: Brill, 2020, 85–109.
Kohlberg, Etan. “Some Imāmī Views on the Companions,” in In Praise of the Few: Studies in Shiʿi Thought and History. Leiden: Brill, 2020, 51–84.
Kohlberg, Etan. “Sunnī Views on the Companions,” in In Praise of the Few: Studies in Shiʿi Thought and History. Leiden: Brill, 2020, 7–34.
Lev, Yaacov. State and Society in Fatimid Egypt. Leiden: Brill, 1991.
De Nerval, Gérard. Voyage en Orient, Vol. II. Paris: Garnier-Flammarion, 1980.
O’Leary, De Lacy. A Short History of the Fāṭimid Khalifate, New York: Dutton and Co., 1923.
Pool, John J. Studies in Muḥammadanism, Westminster: Archibald Constable & Co., 1892.
Rabbat, Nasser. “Who was al-Maqrīzī? A Biographical Sketch.” Mamluk Studies Review 7, no. 2 (2003): 1–19.
Rāġib, Yūsuf. “Un épisode obscur d’histoire fatimide.” Studia Islamica 48 (1978): 125–132.
Rāġib, Yūsuf. “Les mausolées fatimides du quartier d’al-Mašāhid.” Annales Islamologiques 31 (1997): 1–30.
Rosenthal, Franz. “Al-Maḳrīzī.” Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd Edition. Leiden: Brill, 2005.
Saleh, Abdel Hamid. “Ibn Khalaf.” In Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd ed. Leiden: Brill, 2005.
Saunders, John Joseph. A History of Medieval Islam. New York: Routledge, 1980.
Steigerwald, Diana. Imamology in Ismāʿīlī Gnosis, New Delhi: Manohar Publishers, 2015.
Stern, Samuel Miklos. “Abū Abd Allāh al-S̲h̲īʿī.” In Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd ed. Leiden: Brill, 2005.
Stern, Samuel Miklos. “Cairo as the Centre of the Ismāʿīlī Movement.” In Studies in Early Ismailism. Jerusalem: Magnes Press, 1983, 234–256.
Stern, Samuel Miklos. “Ismāʿīlīs and Qarmatians.” In Studies in Early Ismailism. Jerusalem: Magnes Press, 1983: 289–298.
Stewart, Devin. “Popular Shiism in Medieval Egypt: Vestiges of Islamic Sectarian Polemics in Egyptian Arabic.” Studia Islamica 84, 1996, 35–66.
Van Ess, Josef. “Zur Chronologie der Werke des Ḥamīdaddīn al-Kirmānī,” in Kleine Schriften by Josef van Ess, edited by Hinrich Biesterfeldt. Leiden: Brill, 2018.
Van Ess, Josef. Theology and Society in the Second and Third Centuries of the Hijra: A History of Religious Thought in Early Islam, Volume 1. Translated by. John O’Kane. Leiden: Brill, 2017.
Vatikiotis, Panayiotis J. The Fāṭimid Theory of State. Lahore: Institute of Islamic Culture, 1981.
Walker, Paul. The Caliph of Cairo: al-Ḥākim bi-Amr Allāh, 996–1021. New York: American University of Cairo Press, 2012.
Walker, Paul. “Fāṭimid Alexandria as an Entrepôt in the East–West Exchange of Islamic Scholarship.” Al-Masāq 26 (2014): 36–48.
Walker, Paul. “Fāṭimid Institutions of Learning.” Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt 34 (1997): 179–200.
Walker, Paul. Ḥamīd al-Dīn al-Kirmānī: Ismāʿīlī Thought in the Age of al-Ḥākim. London: IB Tauris, 1999.
Walker, Paul. “The Ismāʿīlī Daʿwa in the Reign of the Fāṭimid Caliph al-Ḥākim.” Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt 30 (1993): 161–182.
Walker, Paul. “Al-Maqrīzī and the Fatimids.” Mamluk Studies Review 7, no. 2 (2003): 83–97.
Walker, Paul. Master of the Age: An Islamic Treatise on the Necessity of the Imamate. London: IB Tauris, 2007.
Walker, Paul. “Al-Musabbiḥī.” Encyclopaedia of Islam, THREE. Leiden: Brill, 2022.
Walker, Paul. Orations of the Fāṭimid Caliphs. London: IB Tauris, 2009.
Walker, Paul. “Purloined Symbols of the Past: the Theft of Souvenirs and Sacred Relics in the Rivalry between the Abbasids and Fatimids.” In Culture and Memory in Medieval Islam: Essays in Honour of Wilferd Madelung. Edited by Farhad Daftary and J.W. Meri, 45–62. London: IB Tauris, 2003.
Wensinck, A.J. “Al-ʿAs̲h̲ara al-Mubas̲h̲s̲h̲ara.” In Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd ed. Leiden: Brill, 2005.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 306 | 306 | 11 |
| Full Text Views | 7 | 7 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 20 | 20 | 0 |
While studies of minorities under the Fāṭimid caliph al-Ḥākim (r. 996–1021) have typically emphasized his treatment of Jews and Christians, this article explores the relatively neglected topic of his Sunnī Muslim subjects. During al-Ḥākim’s reign, Sunnīs found themselves in the unusual position of facing political marginalization, and tensions between Sunnīs and Ismāʿīlīs frequently escalated into violence. Al-Ḥākim’s evolving policies toward Sunnīs can be understood as attempts to resolve these recurrent sectarian clashes. Drawing on contemporary chronicles and the largely overlooked Maʿāṣim al-hudā of Ḥamīd al-Dīn al-Kirmānī, this paper identifies four distinct phases in al-Ḥākim’s policy: repression, toleration, syncretic integration, and a return to oppression. Special attention is given to the syncretic phase (1010–1016), during which al-Ḥākim pursued an ambitious program to reconcile sectarian divides through the public rehabilitation of Sunnī figures—most notably Abū Bakr—within Ismāʿīlī doctrine. Al-Kirmānī’s text offers valuable insight into this theological experiment, demonstrating the critical role of scholars in disseminating and defending challenges to extant sectarian frameworks. This case study thus complicates the category of minorityhood by challenging prevailing narratives of rigid sectarian binaries in medieval Islam and documenting a heretofore overlooked attempt to address sectarian violence in a premodern Islamic society.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 306 | 306 | 11 |
| Full Text Views | 7 | 7 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 20 | 20 | 0 |