Lautsi: A Case of âMetaphysical Madnessâ?
In: Religion & Human RightsSearch for other papers by Wouter de Been in
Current site
Google Scholar
As a piece of doctrinal argument the 2009 ruling on Lautsi v. Italy by a Chamber of the Second Section of the ECHR may have been more elegant and convincing. Yet, elaborating doctrinal logic does not exhaust the task of an international court. Hence, even though the recent Grand Chamber reversal displays less doctrinal finesse, it is a more prudent decision appropriately sensitive to the social context.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 241 | 54 | 5 |
| Full Text Views | 16 | 0 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 36 | 0 | 0 |
Lautsi: A Case of âMetaphysical Madnessâ?
In: Religion & Human RightsSearch for other papers by Wouter de Been in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
As a piece of doctrinal argument the 2009 ruling on Lautsi v. Italy by a Chamber of the Second Section of the ECHR may have been more elegant and convincing. Yet, elaborating doctrinal logic does not exhaust the task of an international court. Hence, even though the recent Grand Chamber reversal displays less doctrinal finesse, it is a more prudent decision appropriately sensitive to the social context.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 241 | 54 | 5 |
| Full Text Views | 16 | 0 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 36 | 0 | 0 |
