The Mark of the Beast, Reception History, and Early Pentecostal Literature
äºJournal of Pentecostal TheologySearch for other papers by David R. Johnson in
Current site
Google Scholar
This article examines appearances of the mark of the beast or beast in the early Pentecostal Literature from 1908â1918. By utilizing Wirkungsgeschichte, this article demonstrates that early Pentecostal interpretations were not monolithic when interpreting bestial texts. Dispensationalism did not control their interpretations. The Apocalypse had a significant impact on early Pentecostal reflection including their criticism of issues associated with World War i.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
5
âHollenweger, âPentecostals and the Charismatic Movementâ, pp. 549â53.
| å ¨é¨æé´ | è¿å»ä¸å¹´ | è¿å»30天 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| æè¦æµè§æ¬¡æ° | 1106 | 67 | 15 |
| å ¨ææµè§æ¬¡æ° | 213 | 2 | 1 |
| PDFä¸è½½æ¬¡æ° | 105 | 7 | 3 |
The Mark of the Beast, Reception History, and Early Pentecostal Literature
äºJournal of Pentecostal TheologySearch for other papers by David R. Johnson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
This article examines appearances of the mark of the beast or beast in the early Pentecostal Literature from 1908â1918. By utilizing Wirkungsgeschichte, this article demonstrates that early Pentecostal interpretations were not monolithic when interpreting bestial texts. Dispensationalism did not control their interpretations. The Apocalypse had a significant impact on early Pentecostal reflection including their criticism of issues associated with World War i.
| å ¨é¨æé´ | è¿å»ä¸å¹´ | è¿å»30天 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| æè¦æµè§æ¬¡æ° | 1106 | 67 | 15 |
| å ¨ææµè§æ¬¡æ° | 213 | 2 | 1 |
| PDFä¸è½½æ¬¡æ° | 105 | 7 | 3 |
