A pentecostal Response to Pinnockâs Proposal
äºJournal of Pentecostal TheologySearch for other papers by R. Gause in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
This response to Clark Pinnockâs proposal for Pentecostal ecclesiology appreciates the affirming and promising directions that have been offered. Yet the respondent also recognizes the many significant ecclesiological contributions in the early practice, polity, and literature of the Pentecostal movement that have not been sufficiently acknowledged due to their being manifest in forms other than those of formal academic theologyâa fact that should not be allowed to diminish recognition of their ecclesiological import and impact.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| å ¨é¨æé´ | è¿å»ä¸å¹´ | è¿å»30天 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| æè¦æµè§æ¬¡æ° | 237 | 42 | 9 |
| å ¨ææµè§æ¬¡æ° | 163 | 0 | 0 |
| PDFä¸è½½æ¬¡æ° | 150 | 1 | 0 |
A pentecostal Response to Pinnockâs Proposal
äºJournal of Pentecostal TheologySearch for other papers by R. Gause in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
This response to Clark Pinnockâs proposal for Pentecostal ecclesiology appreciates the affirming and promising directions that have been offered. Yet the respondent also recognizes the many significant ecclesiological contributions in the early practice, polity, and literature of the Pentecostal movement that have not been sufficiently acknowledged due to their being manifest in forms other than those of formal academic theologyâa fact that should not be allowed to diminish recognition of their ecclesiological import and impact.
| å ¨é¨æé´ | è¿å»ä¸å¹´ | è¿å»30天 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| æè¦æµè§æ¬¡æ° | 237 | 42 | 9 |
| å ¨ææµè§æ¬¡æ° | 163 | 0 | 0 |
| PDFä¸è½½æ¬¡æ° | 150 | 1 | 0 |
