This article responds from a âFull Gospelâ perspective to Moltmann's critical-constructive dialogue with the âFull Gospel Theologyâ of Dr Yonggi Cho. Moltmann's emphasis on the resurrection of Christ as the inexhaustible source of the Gospel, his eschatological orientation, as well as the wide horizon of his theological reflectionâincluding individual and communal dimensions of humanity, nature and universe, and all dimensions of timeâare affirmed, while some distinct differences are uplifted concerning pneumatology and the understanding of time and hope. An especially strong objection is raised to the element of universalism in Moltmannâs perspective.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1862 | 442 | 2 |
| Full Text Views | 60 | 2 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 44 | 0 | 0 |
This article responds from a âFull Gospelâ perspective to Moltmann's critical-constructive dialogue with the âFull Gospel Theologyâ of Dr Yonggi Cho. Moltmann's emphasis on the resurrection of Christ as the inexhaustible source of the Gospel, his eschatological orientation, as well as the wide horizon of his theological reflectionâincluding individual and communal dimensions of humanity, nature and universe, and all dimensions of timeâare affirmed, while some distinct differences are uplifted concerning pneumatology and the understanding of time and hope. An especially strong objection is raised to the element of universalism in Moltmannâs perspective.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1862 | 442 | 2 |
| Full Text Views | 60 | 2 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 44 | 0 | 0 |