Access to the Territory Between Domination and Authority: Some Thoughts Regarding the Policies of Non-entrée
In: Political Anthropological Research on International Social Sciences (PARISS)Senior Member of the Institut Universitaire de France
Member of the Institut Convergences Migrations
Search for other papers by Marie-Laure Basilien-Gainche in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Examining the policies of non-entrée states of the Global North develop to prevent exilesâ arrivals on their territory, the article deploys a legal analysis and a theoretical perspective in order to question such a closure to exiles who are deprived of their right to be recognised as persons before the law. The techniques of non-entrée decouple the territory from the borders by expanding these ones outside and inside the territory, deploying methods of domination, so much so exiles are dispossessed of their status of subject of law. Yet exploiting the potential of the principle of responsibility in both its legal and political dimension, it is argued that sovereignty should be understood as non-domination, as authority, accepting all the consequences of the principle of responsibility. Based upon such reflections, is proposed a substantialisation of the right to have rights, leading to the assertion of a new ethos and nomos that embrace plurality and otherness.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1178 | 191 | 26 |
| Full Text Views | 38 | 9 | 2 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 60 | 20 | 0 |
Access to the Territory Between Domination and Authority: Some Thoughts Regarding the Policies of Non-entrée
In: Political Anthropological Research on International Social Sciences (PARISS)Senior Member of the Institut Universitaire de France
Member of the Institut Convergences Migrations
Search for other papers by Marie-Laure Basilien-Gainche in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Examining the policies of non-entrée states of the Global North develop to prevent exilesâ arrivals on their territory, the article deploys a legal analysis and a theoretical perspective in order to question such a closure to exiles who are deprived of their right to be recognised as persons before the law. The techniques of non-entrée decouple the territory from the borders by expanding these ones outside and inside the territory, deploying methods of domination, so much so exiles are dispossessed of their status of subject of law. Yet exploiting the potential of the principle of responsibility in both its legal and political dimension, it is argued that sovereignty should be understood as non-domination, as authority, accepting all the consequences of the principle of responsibility. Based upon such reflections, is proposed a substantialisation of the right to have rights, leading to the assertion of a new ethos and nomos that embrace plurality and otherness.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1178 | 191 | 26 |
| Full Text Views | 38 | 9 | 2 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 60 | 20 | 0 |
