This study investigates Avicennaâs conception of philosophical terminology through an analysis of the relation between equivocity (ishtirÄk) and modulation (tashkÄ«k) and by drawing evidence from a broad array of logical, physical, and metaphysical texts. In so doing, it also re-examines the notion of the modulation of existence (tashkÄ«k al-wujÅ«d). Although the intrinsic definitional ambiguity of tashkÄ«k makes it possible to approach it alternatively through the lens of univocity and equivocity, there are strong textual and philosophical reasons to believe that Avicenna preferred to regard tashkÄ«k as a kind of moderate equivocity, as opposed to both univocity and a kind of pure or absolute equivocity. As a corollary, it is preferable to construe tashkÄ«k al-wujÅ«d as a âmodulated equivocity of beingâ rather than as a âmodulated univocity of being.â On the one hand, this underscores the continuity with Aristotleâs theory of pros hen predication and its late-antique Greek and early Arabic reception, which Avicenna, as heir to a long commentatorial tradition, reinterprets in his own way. On the other hand, the reading of the asmÄʾ mushakkika and tashkÄ«k al-wujÅ«d proposed here may explain some of the origins of the ontological debates on the construal of existence that developed from the post-classical reception of Avicennaâs works.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Afnan, Soheil Muhsin. Philosophical Terminology in Arabic and Persian. Leiden: Brill, 1964.
Alexander of Aphrodisias. Commentary on the Metaphysics. Ed. by Michael Hayduck. Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, vol. 1. Berlin: Reimer, 1891.
Alpina, Tommaso. Subject, Definition, Activity: Framing Avicennaâs Science of the Soul. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2021.
Alpina, Tommaso. âIs Nutrition a Sufficient Condition for Life: Avicennaâs Position between Natural Philosophy and Medicine.â In Nutrition and Nutritive Soul in Aristotle and Aristotelianism. Ed. by Giouli Korobili and Roberto Lo Presti. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2020, 221â258.
Ammonius. Commentary on the Categories. Ed. by Adolfus Busse. Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, vol. 4.4. Berlin: Reimer, 1895.
Ammonius. Commentary on Porphyryâs Eisagoge. Ed. by Adolfus Busse. Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, vol. 4.3. Berlin: Reimer, 1891.
Ansari, Rosabel Pauline. The Ambiguity of âBeingâ in Arabic and Islamic Philosophy. Ph.D. dissertation, Georgetown University, 2020.
Averroes, see Ibn Rushd
Avicenna, see Ibn SÄ«nÄ
Benevich, Fedor. âThe Necessary Existent (wÄjib al-wujÅ«d): From Avicenna to Fakhr al-DÄ«n al-RÄzÄ«.â In Philosophical Theology in Islam: Later AshÊ¿arism East and West. Ed. by Ayman Shihadeh and Jan Thiele. Leiden: Brill, 2020, 123â155.
Benevich, Fedor. Essentialität und Notwendigkeit: Avicenna und die aristotelische Tradition. Leiden: Brill, 2018.
Bertolacci, Amos. âThe âOntologizationâ of Logic. Metaphysical Themes in Avicennaâs Reworking of the Organon.â In Methods and Methodologies: Aristotelian Logic East and West, 500â1500. Ed. by Margaret Cameron and John Marenbon. Leiden: Brill, 2010, 25â51.
Bonmariage, Cécile. Le réel et les réalités: MullÄ á¹¢adrÄ ShÄ«rÄzÄ« et la structure de la réalité. Paris: Vrin, 2007.
De Haan, Daniel. âThe Doctrine of the Analogy of Being in Avicennaâs Metaphysics of the Healing.â The Review of Metaphysics 69.2 (2015): 261â286.
Dexippus. Commentary on the Categories. Ed. by Adolfus Busse. Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, vol. 4.2. Berlin: Reimer, 1888.
Druart, Thérèse-Anne. âIbn SÄ«nÄ and the Ambiguity of Beingâs Univocity.â In Views on the Philosophy of Ibn SÄ«nÄ and Mulla á¹¢adrÄ ShÄ«rÄzÄ«. Ed. by Mokda Arfa Mensia. Carthage: Tunisian Academy of Sciences, Arts, and Letters, 2014, 15â24.
Esots, Janis. âThe Principle of the Systematic Ambiguity of Existence in the Philosophy of Ibn Sina and Mulla Sadra.â Afkar (Journal of Ê¿Aqida and Islamic Thought) 6 (2005): 161â170.
FÄrÄbÄ«. Alfarabiâs Book of Letters (KitÄb al-ḤurÅ«f). Commentary on Aristotleâs Metaphysics. Ed., intro., and annot. by Muhsin Mahdi. Beirut: Dar el-Mashreq Publishers (Imprimerie catholique), 1969.
FÄrÄbÄ«. FÄ« aghrÄḠal-ḥakÄ«m fÄ« kull maqÄla min al-kitÄb al-mawsÅ«m bi-l-ḥurÅ«f. Ed. by Friedrich Dieterici. Leiden: Brill, 1892, 34â38.
Goichon, Amélie-Marie. Vocabulaires comparés dâAristote et dâIbn SÄ«nÄ: Supplément au Lexique de la langue philosophique dâIbn SÄ«nÄ (Avicenne). Paris: Desclée de Brouwer, 1939.
Goichon, Amélie-Marie. Lexique de la langue philosophique dâIbn SÄ«nÄ (Avicenne). Paris: Desclée de Brouwer, 1938.
Griffel, Frank. âIsmÄʿīlite Critique of Ibn SÄ«nÄ: al-ShahrastÄnÄ«âs (d. 1153) Wrestling Match with the Philosophers.â In The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Philosophy. Ed. by Khaled El-Rouayheb and Sabine Schmidtke. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016, 210â232.
Gutas, Dimitri. Avicenna and the Aristotelian Tradition: Introduction to Reading Avicennaâs Philosophical Works. Second, Revised and Enlarged Edition, Including an Inventory of Avicennaâs Authentic Works. Leiden: Brill, 2014.
Hintikka, Kaarlo Jaakko. âDifferent Kinds of Equivocation in Aristotle.â Journal of the History of Philosophy 9.3 (1971): 368â372.
Ibn Rushd. Averroès. Tafsir ma baʿd at-tabiʿat. Texte arabe inédit établi par Maurice Bouyges, 4 vols. Beyrouth: Imprimerie catholique, 1938.
Ibn SÄ«nÄ. al-TaÊ¿lÄ«qÄt. Ed. by Seyyed Hossein Mousavian. Tehran: Iranian Institute of Philosophy, 2013.
Ibn SÄ«nÄ. The Physics of The Healing (al-ShifÄʾ, al-SamÄÊ¿ al-á¹abīʿī), Books I & II. A parallel English-Arabic text. Transl., intro., and annot. by Jon McGinnis. Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University Press, 2009.
Ibn SÄ«nÄ. The Metaphysics of The Healing (al-ShifÄʾ, al-ilÄhiyyÄt). A parallel English-Arabic text. Transl., intro., and annot. by Michael E. Marmura. Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University Press, 2005.
Ibn SÄ«nÄ. Ibn Sînâ: Lettre au Vizir Abû SaÊ¿d. Editio princeps dâaprès le manuscrit de Bursa, traduction de lâarabe, introduction, note et lexique par Yahya Michot. Beyrouth: Les éditions al-Bouraq, 2000.
Ibn SÄ«nÄ. al-MubÄḥathÄt. Ed. by Moḥsen BÄ«dÄrfar. Qum: EnteshÄrÄt-e bÄ«dÄr, 1992.
Ibn SÄ«nÄ. al-NajÄt. Ed. by Moḥammad TaqÄ« DÄneshpajÅ«h. Tehran: EnteshÄrÄt-e dÄneshgÄh, 1985.
Ibn SÄ«nÄ. TafsÄ«r SÅ«rat al-IkhlÄá¹£. In al-TafsÄ«r al-QurʾÄnÄ« wa-l-lugha al-ṣūfiyya fÄ« falsafat Ibn SÄ«nÄ. Ed. by Ḥasan Ê¿Äṣī. Beirut: al-Muʾassasa al-jÄmiÊ¿iyya li-l-dirÄsÄt wa-l-nashr wa-l-tawzīʿ, 1983, 104â113.
Ibn SÄ«nÄ. Ê¿UyÅ«n al-ḥikma. Ed. by Ê¿Abd al-RaḥmÄn BadawÄ«, Second edition. Beirut: DÄr al-qalam, 1980.
Ibn SÄ«nÄ. KitÄb al-HidÄya. Ed. by Muḥammad Ê¿Abduh. Cairo: Maktabat al-qÄhira al-ḥadÄ«tha, 1974.
Ibn SÄ«nÄ. al-MasÄʾil al-gharÄ«ba al-Ê¿ishrÄ«niyya. Ed. by Moḥammad TaqÄ« DÄneshpajÅ«h. In Collected Texts and Papers on Logic and Language. Ed. by Mehdi Mohaghegh and Toshihiko Izutsu. Tehran: EnteshÄrÄt-e DÄneshgÄh, 1974, 79â103.
Ibn SÄ«nÄ. KitÄb al-ShifÄʾ, al-Maná¹iq, al-Ê¿IbÄra. Ed. by MaḥmÅ«d al-Khuá¸ayrÄ«. Cairo: al-Hayʾa al-miá¹£riyya al-Ê¿Ämma li-l-taʾlÄ«f wa-l-nashr, 1970.
Ibn SÄ«nÄ. KitÄb al-ShifÄʾ, al-Maná¹iq, al-Jadal. Ed. by Aḥmad FuʾÄd al-AhwÄnÄ«. Cairo: al-Hayʾa al-Ê¿Ämma li-shuʾūn al-maá¹ÄbiÊ¿ al-amÄ«riyya, 1965.
Ibn SÄ«nÄ. KitÄb al-ShifÄʾ, al-Maná¹iq, al-QiyÄs. Ed. by Saʿīd ZÄyid. Cairo: al-Hayʾa al-Ê¿Ämma li-shuʾūn al-maá¹ÄbiÊ¿ al-amÄ«riyya, 1964.
Ibn SÄ«nÄ. Livre des définitions [KitÄb al-ḤudÅ«d]. Ed., transl., and annot. by Amélie-Marie Goichon. Cairo: Publications de lâInstitut français dâarchéologie orientale du Caire, 1963.
Ibn SÄ«nÄ. KitÄb al-ShifÄʾ, al-Maná¹iq, al-MaqÅ«lÄt. Ed. by al-Ab QanawÄtÄ«, MaḥmÅ«d al-Khuá¸ayrÄ«, Aḥmad FuʾÄd al-AhwÄnÄ«, and Saʿīd ZÄyid. Cairo: al-Hayʾa al-Ê¿Ämma li-shuʾūn al-maá¹ÄbiÊ¿ al-amÄ«riyya, 1959.
Ibn SÄ«nÄ. Avicennaâs De Anima (Arabic Text): Being the Psychological Part of KitÄb al-ShifÄʾ. Ed. by Fazlur Rahman. London: Oxford University Press, 1959.
Ibn SÄ«nÄ. KitÄb al-ShifÄʾ, al-Maná¹iq, al-BurhÄn. Ed. by AbÅ« l-Ê¿AlÄ Ê¿AfÄ«fÄ«. Cairo: al-Maá¹baÊ¿a al-amÄ«riyya, 1956.
Ibn SÄ«nÄ. KitÄb al-ShifÄʾ, al-Maná¹iq, al-Madkhal. Ed. by al-Ab QanawÄtÄ«, MaḥmÅ«d al-Khuá¸ayrÄ« and Aḥmad FuʾÄd al-AhwÄnÄ«. Cairo: al-Hayʾa al-Ê¿Ämma li-shuʾūn al-maá¹ÄbiÊ¿ al-amÄ«riyya, 1952.
Ibn SÄ«nÄ. DÄneshnÄmeh-ye Ê¿AlÄʾī, IlÄhiyyÄt. Ed. by Muḥammad Muʿīn. Tehran: DÄneshgÄh-ye TehrÄn, 1952.
Ibn SÄ«nÄ. AḥwÄl al-nafs. Ed. by Aḥmad FuʾÄd al-AhwÄnÄ«. Cairo: DÄr iḥyÄʾ al-kutub al-Ê¿arabiyya, 1952.
Ibn al-Ṭayyib, AbÅ« l-Faraj. Der Kategorienkommentar von AbÅ« l-Faraǧ Ê¿AbdallÄh ibn aá¹-Ṭayyib. Ed. and annot. by Cleophea Ferrari. Leiden: Brill, 2006.
Ibn al-Ṭayyib, AbÅ« l-Faraj. TafsÄ«r KitÄb ĪsÄghÅ«jÄ« li-FurfÅ«riyÅ«s. Ed. by Kwame Gyekye. Beirut: DÄr al-mashriq, 1975.
Irwin, Terence Henry. âHomonymy in Aristotle.â The Review of Metaphysics 34.3 (1981): 523â544.
Janos, Damien. âTashkÄ«k al-wujÅ«d and the lawÄzim in Avicennaâs Metaphysics.â Forthcoming.
Janos, Damien. Avicenna on the Ontology of Pure Quiddity. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2020.
Johannessen, Timothy Mark. The Avicennian Moment: Separation and the Science of Being (qua Being) in Aristotle and Avicenna. Ph.D. dissertation, Asia Institute, University of Melbourne, 2019.
JurjÄnÄ«, Ê¿AlÄ« b. Muḥammad. MuÊ¿jam al-taÊ¿rÄ«fÄt. Ed. by Muḥammad á¹¢iddÄ«q al-MinshÄwÄ«. Cairo: DÄr al-faá¸Ä«la, 2004.
Key, Alexander. Language between God and the Poets: MaÊ¿nÄ in the Eleventh Century. Oakland: University of California Press, 2018.
Kalbarczyk, Alexander. Predication and Ontology: Studies and Texts on Avicennian and Post-Avicennian Readings of Aristotleâs Categories. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2018.
Kalbarczyk, Alexander. âThe KitÄb al-MaqÅ«lÄt of the Muḫtaá¹£ar al-awsaá¹ fÄ« l-maná¹iq: A Hitherto Unknown Source for Studying Ibn SÄ«nÄâs Reception of Aristotleâs Categories.â Oriens 40 (2012): 305â354.
Lewis, Frank A. âAristotle on the Homonymy of Being.â Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68.1 (2004): 1â36.
Lizzini, Olga. âIbn SÄ«nÄâs Metaphysics.â In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2015, revised 2020). Retrieved 7/21/2021 via https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ibn-sina-metaphysics/
Lizzini, Olga. âWuǧūd-Mawǧūd / Existence-Existent in Avicenna: A Key Ontological Notion of Arabic Philosophy.â Quaestio 3 (2003): 111â138.
Menn, Stephen. âAvicennaâs Metaphysics.â In Interpreting Avicenna: Critical Essays. Ed. by Peter Adamson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013, 143â169.
Menn, Stephen and Robert Wisnovsky. âYaḥyÄ ibn Ê¿AdÄ« On the Four Scientific Questions Concerning the Three Kinds of Existence. Editio princeps and Translation.â Mélanges de lâInstitut dominicain dâétudes orientales du Caire (MIDEO) 29 (2012): 73â96.
Philoponus. Commentary on the Categories. Ed. by Adolfus Busse. Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, vol. 13.1. Berlin: Reimer, 1898.
Porphyry. On Aristotle Categories. Transl. by Steven K. Strange. London: Bloomsbury, 1992.
Porphyry. Commentary on the Categories. Ed. by Adolfus Busse. Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, vol. 4.1. Berlin: Reimer, 1887.
Porphyry. Commentary on the Eisagoge. Ed. by Adolfus Busse. Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, vol. 4.1. Berlin: Reimer, 1887.
Rashed, Marwan. âIbn Ê¿AdÄ« et Avicenne: sur les types dâexistants.â In Aristotele e i suoi esegeti neoplatonici: logica e ontologia nelle interpretazioni greche e arabe. Ed. by Vincenza Celluprica and Cristina DâAncona with the collaboration of Riccardo Chiaradonna. Naples: Bibliopolis, 2004, 107â171.
Rizvi, Sajjad. MullÄ á¹¢adrÄ and Metaphysics: Modulation of Being. London: Routledge, 2009.
Schöck, Cornelia. Koranexegese, Grammatik und Logik: zum Verhältnis von arabischer und aristotelischer Urteils-, Konsequenz- und SchluÃlehre. Leiden: Brill, 2006.
Shields, Christopher. Order in Multiplicity: Homonymy in the Philosophy of Aristotle. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Simplicius. On Aristotle Categories 1â4. Transl. by Michael Chase. London: Bloomsbury, 2003.
Simplicius. Commentary on the Categories. Ed. by Carolus Kalbfleisch. Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, vol. 8. Berlin: Reimer, 1907.
Tolkiehn, Niels. The Notions of Homonymy, Synonymy, Multivocity, and Pros Hen in Aristotle. Ph.D. dissertation. Dissertationen der LMU München, vol. 37. Munich: Universitätsbibliothek der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, 2019.
Treiger, Alexander. âAvicennaâs Notion of Transcendental Modulation of Existence (taÅ¡kÄ«k al-wuÄÅ«d, analogia entis) and its Greek and Arabic Sources.â In Islamic Philosophy, Science, Culture, and Religion: Studies in Honor of Dimitri Gutas. Ed. by Felicitas Opwis and David Reisman. Leiden: Brill, 2012, 327â363.
Vallat, Philippe. Farabi et lâécole dâAlexandrie: des prémisses de la connaissance à la philosophie politique. Paris: Vrin, 2004.
Ward, Julie K. Aristotle on Homonymy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
Wisnovsky, Robert. âOn the Emergence of Maragha Avicennism.â Oriens 46 (2018): 263â331.
Wisnovsky, Robert. Avicennaâs Metaphysics in Context. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 2003.
Wolfson, Harry Austryn. âThe Amphibolous Terms in Aristotle, Arabic Philosophy and Maimonides.â The Harvard Theological Review 31.2 (1938): 151â173.
YaḥyÄ b. Ê¿AdÄ«. FÄ« tabyÄ«n wujÅ«d al-umÅ«r al-Ê¿Ämmiyya. In YaḥyÄ b. Ê¿AdÄ«. The Philosophical Treatises. Ed. by SaḥbÄn KhalÄ«fÄt. Amman: Department of Philosophy, University of Jordan, 1988, 148â159.
Zamboni, Francesco Omar. âIs Existence One or Manifold? Avicenna and his Early Interpreters on the Modulation of Existence (taÅ¡kÄ«k al-wuǧūd).â Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 31 (2020): 121â149.
Zimmermann, Fritz W. al-Farabiâs Commentary and Short Treatise on Aristotleâs De Interpretatione. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1605 | 241 | 34 |
| Full Text Views | 227 | 9 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 584 | 20 | 0 |
This study investigates Avicennaâs conception of philosophical terminology through an analysis of the relation between equivocity (ishtirÄk) and modulation (tashkÄ«k) and by drawing evidence from a broad array of logical, physical, and metaphysical texts. In so doing, it also re-examines the notion of the modulation of existence (tashkÄ«k al-wujÅ«d). Although the intrinsic definitional ambiguity of tashkÄ«k makes it possible to approach it alternatively through the lens of univocity and equivocity, there are strong textual and philosophical reasons to believe that Avicenna preferred to regard tashkÄ«k as a kind of moderate equivocity, as opposed to both univocity and a kind of pure or absolute equivocity. As a corollary, it is preferable to construe tashkÄ«k al-wujÅ«d as a âmodulated equivocity of beingâ rather than as a âmodulated univocity of being.â On the one hand, this underscores the continuity with Aristotleâs theory of pros hen predication and its late-antique Greek and early Arabic reception, which Avicenna, as heir to a long commentatorial tradition, reinterprets in his own way. On the other hand, the reading of the asmÄʾ mushakkika and tashkÄ«k al-wujÅ«d proposed here may explain some of the origins of the ontological debates on the construal of existence that developed from the post-classical reception of Avicennaâs works.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1605 | 241 | 34 |
| Full Text Views | 227 | 9 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 584 | 20 | 0 |