The principle known as the possibility of the nobler (qÄÊ¿idat imkÄn al-ashraf) is arguably one of the most often employed principles in later Islamic philosophy. In its standard formulation it states that if something baser exists, a nobler thing must have existed prior to it. A similar argument from the degrees of perfections has had a long career in the history of Western philosophy as well, with its beginnings reaching Stoicism. In Christian theology and philosophy it serves most importantly as a proof for the existence of God in the so-called henological argument of Aquinas. In Islamic philosophy it directly derives from the ex uno non fit nisi unum principle. Since the formulation of its standard version by al-SuhrawardÄ«, the validity of the principle has been conditioned on that it is only applicable to the intelligible beings, hence its main objective is to offer a proof for the existence of the intellects. The article analyzes the application of the principle in á¹¢adrÄâs philosophy and enquires about its historical roots.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
BadawÄ«, Ê¿Abd al-Raḥman (ed.). AflÅ«á¹Ä«n Ê¿inda l-Ê¿arab. Kuwait: WakÄlat maá¹būʿÄt, 1977 (first edition: Cairo, 1955).
Amin, Wahid M. ââFrom the One, Only One Proceedsâ: The Post-Classical Reception of a Key Principle of Avicennaâs Metaphysics,â Oriens 48 (2020):123â153.
Aristotle. Arisá¹Å«á¹ÄlÄ«s fÄ« l-samÄʾ wa-l-ÄthÄr al-Ê¿ulwiyya. Ed. by Ê¿Abd al-Raḥman BadawÄ«. Cairo: Maktabat al-nahá¸a al-miá¹£riyya, 1961.
Aristotle. MÄ baÊ¿d al-á¹abīʿa. Damascus: DÄr dhÅ« l-faqÄr, 2008.
DÄmÄd, MÄ«r. KitaÌb al-qabasaÌt. Ed. by MahdiÌ MuhÌ£aqqiq Ê¿AlÄ« MÅ«savÄ« BihbahÄnÄ« and Toshihiko Izutsu. Tehran: Muʾassasih-yi chaÌp va intishaÌraÌt-i DanishgaÌh-i TihraÌn, 1374 Sh/1995.
DâAncona, Cristina. ââAristÌ£uÌ Ê¿inda l-Ê¿Arab,â and beyond.â In Aristotle and the Arabic Tradition. Ed. by Ahmed Alwishah and Josh Hayes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015, 11â29.
DâAncona, Cristina. âEx uno non fit nisi unum: Storia e preistoria della dottrina avicenniana della Prima Intelligenza.â In Per una storia del concetto di mente. Ed. by Eugenio Canone. Florence: Olschki, 2007, 29â55.
DawÄnÄ«, JalÄl al-DÄ«n al-. ShawÄkil al-ḥūr fÄ« HayÄkil al-nÅ«r. London: Alwarrak Publishing, 2010.
Di Branco, Marco. âThe âPerfect Kingâ and his Philosophers. Politics, Religion and Graeco-Arabic Philosophy in Safavid Iran: The Case of the UṯuÌluÌgÌiyaÌ.â Studia graeco-arabica 4 (2014):191â218.
DÄ«nÄnÄ«, GhulÄmḥusayn. QawÄÊ¿id-i kulli-yi falsafih-yi islÄmÄ«, 2 vols. Tehran: PazhÅ«hishgÄh-i Ê¿ulÅ«m-i insÄnÄ« va muá¹alaÊ¿Ät-i farhangÄ«, 1372 Sh/1994.
Dodds, Eric R. The Elements of Theology. Oxford: Clarendon, 1962 [1st ed. 1933].
Endress, Gerhard. Proclus Arabus: Zwanzig Abschnitte aus der Institutio Theologica in arabischer Ãbersetzung. Eingeleitet, herausgegeben und erklärt. Beiruter Texte und Studien, vol. 10. Wiesbaden: F. Steiner, 1973.
FÄrÄbÄ«, AbÅ« Naá¹£r al-. Al-Farabi on the Perfect State: AbÅ« Naá¹£r al-FÄrÄbÄ«âs MabÄdiʾ ÄrÄʾ ahl al-madÄ«na al-fÄá¸ila. Introd., transl. and comm. by Richard Walzer. Oxford: Clarendon, 1985.
Graeser, Andreas. Plotinus and the Stoics. Leiden: Brill, 1972.
HÄʾirÄ«-YazdÄ«, MahdÄ«. KÄvishhÄ-yi Ê¿aql-i Ê¿amali (falsafih-yi akhlÄq). Tehran: Muʾassassih-yi muá¹ÄliÊ¿Ät va taḥqÄ«qÄt-i farhangÄ«, 1361 Sh.
Ibn KammÅ«na. Al-TanqīḥÄt fÄ« Sharḥ al-TalwīḥÄt, vol. III. Ed. by NajafqulÄ« ḤabÄ«bÄ«. Tehran: Markaz al-buḥūth wa-l-dirÄsÄt li-l-turÄth al-makhá¹Å«á¹, 1391 Sh/2012.
Ibn SÄ«nÄ. DÄnishnÄmih-yi Ê¿AlÄʾī, IlÄhiyyÄt. Ed. by Muḥammad Muʿīn. Tehran: Anjuman-i ÄthÄr va mafÄkhir-i farhangÄ«, 1383 Sh/2004.
Ibn SÄ«nÄ. Al-ShifÄʾ, al-IlÄhiyyÄt I. Prefaced by IbrÄhÄ«m MadkÅ«r and ed. by Georges C. Anawati and Saʿīd ZÄyid. Cairo: al-MatḠaÊ¿a al-amÄ«riyya 1960.
Ibn SÄ«nÄ. Al-TaÊ¿lÄ«qÄt. Ed. and intr. by Ê¿Abd al-RaḥmÄn BadawÄ«. Qum: Maktab al-aÊ¿lÄm al-islÄmÄ«, n.d.
Ivry, Alfred L. Al-Kindiâs Metaphysics: A Translation of YaÊ¿qÅ«b Ibn IsḥÄq al-KindÄ«âs Treatise On First Philosophy. Albany: SUNY Press, 1974.
Janssens, Jules. âDaÌnesh-NaÌmeh dâIbn SiÌnaÌ: un texte à revoir?.â Bulletin de philosophie médiévale 28 (1986):163â177.
Janssens, Jules. âIbn SiÌnaÌâs TaÊ¿lÄ«qÄt: The Presence of Paraphrases of and Super-commentaries on the IlÄhÄ«yÄt of the Å ifÄʾ.â In Islamic Philosophy, Science, Culture, and Religion: Studies in Honor of Dimitri Gutas. Ed. by Felicitas Opwis and David Reisman. Leiden, Boston: Brill, 2012, 201â222.
Lloyd, Anthony C. âThe Principle that the Cause is Greater than its Effect.â Phronesis 21, no. 2 (1976): 146â156.
McGinnis, Jon. âWhat Underlies the Change from Potentiality to Possibility? A Select History of the Theory Matter from Aristotle to Avicenna.â Cadernos de História e Filosofia da Ciência, ser. 3, vol. 17, no. 2 (2007): 259â278.
Masoumi Hamedanee, Hossein. âHistory of Science in Iran in the Last Four Centuries.â In Science and Technology in Islam: Technology and Applied Sciences. Ed. by Ahmad Y. al-Hassan. Paris: Unesco Publications, 2001, 4:614â642.
Michot, Yahya J. La destinée de lâhomme selon Avicenne. Louvain: Peeters, 1986.
Miá¹£bÄḥ-YazdÄ«, Muḥammad TaqÄ«. DurÅ«s-i falsafih-yi akhlÄq. Tehran: Iá¹á¹ilÄÊ¿Ät, 1374 Sh.
Nasr, Seyyed Hossein. âMullaÌ SÌ£adraÌ as a Source for the History of Islamic Philosophy.â Islamic Studies, 3, no. 3 (1964): 309â314.
Nasr, Seyyed Hossein. á¹¢adr al-DÄ«n ShÄ«rÄzÄ« and His Transcendent Philosophy. Tehran: Imperial Iranian Academy of Philosophy, 1978.
Plotinus. Plotini Opera, II: Enneades IVâV. Ed. by Paul Henry and Hans-Rudolf Schwyzer. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer et Cie & Brussels: LâÃdition Universelle, 1959.
Plotinus. Plotinus. Greek text with English translation by Arthur H. Armstrong. Cambridge, MA: Loeb Classical Library, 1984.
Rahman, Fazlur. The Philosophy of MullÄ á¹¢adrÄ. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1975.
Rahman, Fazlur. âHeavenly Bodies, Movement, and the Eternity of the World.â In Essays on Islamic Philosophy and Science. Ed. by George Hourani. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press, 1975, 222â237.
Rizvi, Sajjad H. âNew Sociopolitical Formations and the âRenaissanceâ of Philosophy.â In The Wiley-Blackwell History of Islam and Islamic Civilization. Ed. by Armando Salvatore. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2018, 393â412.
Sanford, David. âDegrees of Perfection.â In The Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Ed. by Paul Edwards. 8 vols. New York & London: MacMillan, 2:324â326.
ShÄ«rÄzÄ«, Quá¹b al-DÄ«n al-. Sharḥ Ḥikmat al-ishrÄq-i SuhrawardÄ«. Ed. by Ê¿Abdallah NÅ«rÄnÄ« and MahdÄ« Muḥaqqiq. Tehran: Anjuman-i ÄthÄr wa mafÄkhir-i farhangÄ«, 1383 Sh.
ShÄ«rÄzÄ«, á¹¢adr al-DÄ«n al-. Addenda on the Commentary on the Philosophy of Illumination. Ed. by Hossein Ziai. Costa Mesa: Mazda Publishers, 2010.
ShÄ«rÄzÄ«, á¹¢adr al-DÄ«n al-. The Elixir of the Gnostics. Translated, introduced, and annotated by William C. Chittick. Provo: Brigham Young University Press, 2003.
ShÄ«rÄzÄ«, á¹¢adr al-DÄ«n al-. Ḥikmat al-ishrÄq-i SuhrawardÄ« bÄ sharḥ-i Quá¹b al-DÄ«n al-ShÄ«rÄzÄ« va taÊ¿lÄ«qÄt-i á¹¢adr al-mutaʾallihÄ«n. Intr. and ed. by NajafqulÄ« ḤabÄ«bÄ«, vol. 4. Tehran: IntishÄrÄt-i bunyÄd-i ḥikmat-i islÄmÄ«-yi á¹¢adrÄ, 1393 Sh.
ShÄ«rÄzÄ«, á¹¢adr al-DÄ«n al-. al-Ḥikma al-mutaÊ¿Äliya fÄ« l-asfÄr al-Ê¿aqliyya al-arbaÊ¿a, 9 vols. Ed. by Riá¸Ä Luá¹fÄ«, IbrÄhÄ«m AmÄ«nÄ«, and FatḥallÄh UmmÄ«d. Beirut: DÄr iḥyÄʾ al-turÄth al-Ê¿arabÄ«, 1383/1981, 3rd ed.
ShÄ«rÄzÄ«, á¹¢adr al-DÄ«n al-. RisÄla fÄ« l-ḥudÅ«th. Ed. by Sayyid Ḥusayn MÅ«saviyÄn. Tehran: BunyÄd-i ḥikmat-i islÄmÄ«-yi á¹¢adrÄ, 1378.
ShÄ«rÄzÄ«, á¹¢adr al-DÄ«n al-. TaÊ¿lÄ«qÄt li-á¹¢adr al-mutaʾallihÄ«n Ê¿alÄ l-ShifÄʾ. Qum: BÄ«dÄr, n.d.
ShahrazÅ«rÄ«, Shams al-DÄ«n Muḥammad al-. RasÄʾil al-shajara al-ilÄhiyya. Ed. by Najafquli ḤabÄ«bÄ«. Tehran: Muʾassassih-yi pazhÅ«hishÄ« ḥikmat va falsafih-yi Iran, 1385 Sh.
Schmidtke, Sabine and Reza Pourjavady. âAn Eastern Renaissance? Greek Philosophy under the Safavids (16thâ18th centuries AD).â Intellectual History of the Islamicate World 3 (2015): 248â290.
Steel, Carlos. âAvicenna and Thomas Aquinas on Evil.â In Avicenna and his Heritage, Acts of the International Colloquium, Leuven â Louvain-la-Neuve, September 8âSeptember 11, 1999. Ed. by Jules Janssens and Daniel de Smet. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2002, 171â196.
SuhrawardÄ«, ShihÄb al-DÄ«n al-. The Book of Radiance: Partaw-naÌmih. A Parallel English-Persian text edited and translated, with an introduction by Hossein Ziai. Costa Mesa: Mazda Publishers, 1998.
SuhrawardÄ«, ShihÄb al-DÄ«n al-. Opera metaphysica et mystica, vol. IâIII. Ed. by Henry Corbin. Tehran: Académie Impériale Iranienne de Philosophie, 1945â77.
SuhrawardÄ«, ShihÄb al-DÄ«n al-. Opera metaphysica et mystica, vol. IV. Ed. by NajafqulÄ« ḤabÄ«bÄ«. Tehran: PazhÅ«hishgÄh-i Ê¿ulÅ«m-i insÄnÄ« va muá¹alaÊ¿Ät-i farhangÄ«, 2001.
SuhrawardÄ«, ShihÄb al-DÄ«n al-. The Philosophy of Illumination. Trans. and ed. by John Walbridge and Hossein Ziai. Provo: Brigham Young University, 1999.
Taylor, Richard C. âA Critical Analysis of the Structure of the KalÄm fÄ« mahd al-khair (Liber de Causis).â In Neoplatonism and Islamic Thought. Ed. by Parviz Morewedge. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992, 11â40.
Terrier, Mathieu. âQutÌ£b al-DiÌn AshkevariÌ: Un philosophe discret de la renaissance safavide.â Studia Iranica 40 (2011): 171â210.
Wakelnig, Elvira. âProclus, Arabic.â In Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Ed. by Henrik Lagerlund. Dordrecht: Springer, 2020, 2nd ed., 1604â1608.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 963 | 223 | 12 |
| Full Text Views | 1571 | 100 | 36 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 378 | 26 | 0 |
The principle known as the possibility of the nobler (qÄÊ¿idat imkÄn al-ashraf) is arguably one of the most often employed principles in later Islamic philosophy. In its standard formulation it states that if something baser exists, a nobler thing must have existed prior to it. A similar argument from the degrees of perfections has had a long career in the history of Western philosophy as well, with its beginnings reaching Stoicism. In Christian theology and philosophy it serves most importantly as a proof for the existence of God in the so-called henological argument of Aquinas. In Islamic philosophy it directly derives from the ex uno non fit nisi unum principle. Since the formulation of its standard version by al-SuhrawardÄ«, the validity of the principle has been conditioned on that it is only applicable to the intelligible beings, hence its main objective is to offer a proof for the existence of the intellects. The article analyzes the application of the principle in á¹¢adrÄâs philosophy and enquires about its historical roots.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 963 | 223 | 12 |
| Full Text Views | 1571 | 100 | 36 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 378 | 26 | 0 |