This article examines Fakhr al-DÄ«n al-RÄzÄ«âs (d. 606/1210) epistemology and his understanding of syllogistic reasoning through a consideration of Menoâs paradox. It focuses on later works, namely, al-Maá¹Älib al-Ê¿Äliya, KitÄb al-Jabr, and al-TafsÄ«r al-kabÄ«r as well as his treatment of the subject in al-Mulakhkhaá¹£ fÄ« l-ḥikma. Informed by the theories of epistemology developed through the philosophical tradition of Menoâs paradox and first principles, RÄzÄ« views all knowledge formed through syllogistic reasoning as dependent on axiomatic truths (al-badÄ«hiyyÄt), a concept with roots in both the philosophical and theological traditions. These first principles are formed immediately upon the presence of the requisite concepts in the mind, and thus comprise RÄzÄ«âs implicit response to the paradox in that all subsequent knowledge does indeed require previous fundamental knowledge that is not sought nor acquired voluntarily. Finally, the article discusses a separate paradox implicit in RÄzÄ«âs works, namely that he both asserts in sections treating divine determinism that no knowledge can in fact be acquired whatsoever while elsewhere emphasizing the fundamental importance of knowledge acquisition.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Abrahamov, Binyamin. âNecessary Knowledge in Islamic Theology.â British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 20 (1993): 20â32.
Aristotle. Maná¹iq Arisá¹Å«. Ed. by Ê¿Abd al-RaḥmÄn BadawÄ«. Cairo: Maá¹baÊ¿at dÄr al-kutub al-miá¹£riyya, 1948.
Aristotle. Aristotleâs Posterior Analytics. Translated from the Greek with notes by Jonathan Barnes. Oxford: Clarendon University Press, 1976.
Arnzen, Rüdiger. âPlato, Arabic.â In Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer, 2011, 1012â16.
BaghdÄdÄ«, AbÅ« l-BarakÄt al-. al-KitÄb al-MuÊ¿tabar fÄ« l-ḥikma. Iá¹£fahÄn: DÄniÅ¡gÄh, 1995.
BÄqillÄnÄ«, Muḥammad b. al-Ṭayyib al-. KitÄb al-TamhÄ«d. Beirut: al-Maktaba al-sharqiyya, 1957.
Black, Deborah L. âAl-FÄrÄbÄ« on Menoâs Paradox.â In In the Age of al-FÄrÄbÄ«: Arabic Philosophy in the Fourth/Tenth Century. Ed. by Peter Adamson. Warburg Institute Colloquia, vol. 12. London: Warburg Institute, 2008, 15â34.
Dieterici, Friedrich. AlfÄrÄbÄ«âs philosophische Abhandlungen aus londoner, leidener und berliner Handschriften. Leiden: Brill, 1890.
El-Tobgui, Carl Sharif. âFrom Legal Theory to Erkenntnistheorie: Ibn Taymiyya on TawÄtur as the Ultimate Guarantor of Human Cognition.â Oriens 46 (2018): 6â61.
FÄrÄbÄ«, AbÅ« Naá¹£r al-. al-Maná¹iq Ê¿ind al-FÄrÄbÄ«. Ed. by Majid Fakhry and RafÄ«q al-Ê¿Ajam. Beirut: DÄr al-mashriq, 1987.
FÄrÄbÄ«, AbÅ« Naá¹£r al-. RisÄla fÄ« l-Ê¿aql. Beirut: Imprimerie Catholique, 1938.
Griffel, Frank. âAl-GhazÄlÄ«âs Use of âOriginal Human Dispositionâ (Fiá¹ra) and Its Background in the Teachings of al-FÄrÄbÄ« and Avicenna.â The Muslim World 102 (2012): 1â32.
Gutas, Dimitri. Avicenna and the Aristotelian Tradition. New York: Brill, 1988.
Gutas, Dimitri. âPlaton: Tradition Arabe.â In Dictionnaire Des Philosophes Antiques: Supplément. Ed. by Richard Goulet, Jean-Marie Flamand, and Maroun Aouad, vol. 5a. Paris: Editions du Centre national de la recherche scientifique, 2003.
Gutas, Dimitri. âThe Empiricism of Avicenna.â Oriens 40 (2012): 391â436.
Ibn al-NadÄ«m, Muḥammad b. IsḥÄq. The Fihrist of al-NadÄ«m: A Tenth-Century Survey of Muslim Culture. Transl. by Bayard Dodge. New York: Columbia University Press, 1970.
Ibn SÄ«nÄ, AbÅ« Ê¿AlÄ« Ḥusayn. AḥwÄl al-nafs: risÄla fÄ« l-nafs wa baqÄʾihÄ wa-maÊ¿ÄdihÄ. Ed. by Aḥmad FuʾÄd al-AhwÄnÄ«. Cairo: ʿĪsÄ al-BÄbÄ« al-ḤalabÄ«, 1952.
Ibn SÄ«nÄ, AbÅ« Ê¿AlÄ« Ḥusayn. al-ShifÄʾ, al-Maná¹iq, al-BurhÄn. Ed. by IbrÄhÄ«m MadkÅ«r. Cairo: al-Maá¹baÊ¿a al-amÄ«riyya, 1956.
Ibn SÄ«nÄ, AbÅ« Ê¿AlÄ« Ḥusayn. KitÄb al-NajÄt fÄ« l-ḥikma al-maná¹iqiyya wa-l-á¹abīʿiyya wa-l-ilÄhiyya. Ed. by MÄjid FakhrÄ«. Beirut: DÄr al-ÄfÄq al-jadÄ«da, 1985.
Ibn ṬÄhir al-BaghdÄdÄ«, Ê¿Abd al-QÄhir. KitÄb Uṣūl al-dÄ«n. Istanbul: Maá¹baÊ¿at al-dawla, 1928.
Ibrahim, Bilal. âFaḫr ad-DÄ«n ar-RÄzÄ«, Ibn al-Hayṯam and Aristotelian Science: Essentialism versus Phenomenalism in Post-Classical Islamic Thought.â Oriens 41 (2013): 379â431.
JuwaynÄ«, Ê¿Abd al-Malik b. Ê¿Abd AllÄh ImÄm al-Ḥaramayn al-. KitÄb al-IrshÄd ilÄ qawÄá¹iÊ¿ al-adilla fÄ« uṣūl al-iÊ¿tiqÄd. Ed. by Aḥmad Ê¿Abd al-Raḥīm and TawfÄ«q Ê¿AlÄ« Wahbah. Cairo: Maktabat al-thaqÄfa al-dÄ«niyya, 2009.
Lameer, Joep. Al-FÄrÄbÄ« and Aristotelian Syllogistics: Greek Theory and Islamic Practice. New York: Brill, 1994.
Marmura, Michael E. âAvicenna on Menoâs Paradox: On âApprehendingâ Unknown Things through Known Things.â Mediaeval Studies 71 (2009): 47â62.
Pines, Shlomo. Nouvelles études sur Awḥad al-Zamân Abu-l-Barakât al-Baghdâdî. Paris: Durlacher, 1955.
Plato. Platoâs Meno in Focus. Ed. by Jane M. Day. Routledge Philosophers in Focus Series. London, New York: Routledge, 1994.
RÄzÄ«, Fakhr al-DÄ«n Muḥammad b. Ê¿Umar al-. al-Maá¹Älib al-Ê¿Äliya min al-Ê¿ilm al-ilÄhÄ«. Ed. by Aḥmad ḤijÄzÄ« al-SaqqÄ. Beirut: DÄr al-kitÄb al-Ê¿arabÄ«, 1987.
RÄzÄ«, Fakhr al-DÄ«n Muḥammad b. Ê¿Umar al-. al-TafsÄ«r al-kabÄ«r. Cairo: al-Maá¹baÊ¿a al-bahiyya al-miá¹£riyya, 1934.
RÄzÄ«, Fakhr al-DÄ«n Muḥammad b. Ê¿Umar al-. âKitÄb al-Jabr.â In al-Maá¹Älib al-Ê¿Äliya min al-Ê¿ilm al-ilÄhÄ«. Ed. by Aḥmad ḤijÄzÄ« al-SaqqÄ, vol. 9. Beirut: DÄr al-kitÄb al-Ê¿arabÄ«, 1987.
RÄzÄ«, Fakhr al-DÄ«n Muḥammad b. Ê¿Umar al-. KitÄb Muḥaṣṣal afkÄr al-mutaqaddimÄ«n wa-l-mutaʾakhkhirÄ«n min al-Ê¿ulamÄʾ wa-l-mutakallimÄ«n. Ed. by Ṭaha Ê¿Abd al-Ruʿūf SaÊ¿d. Cairo: Maktabat al-kulliyyÄt al-azhariyya, 1978.
RÄzÄ«, Fakhr al-DÄ«n Muḥammad b. Ê¿Umar al-. Maná¹iq al-Mulakhkhaá¹£. Ed. by Aḥad FarÄmarz QarÄmalikÄ« and ÄdÄ«nah Aá¹£gharÄ«nizhÄd. Tehran: DÄnishgÄh-i TihrÄn, 2002.
Rosenthal, Franz and Richard Walzer, eds. Plato Arabus. 2 vols. London: In aidibus Instituti Warburgiani, 1943.
Wolfson, Harry Austryn. âThe Terms Taá¹£awwur and Taá¹£dÄ«q in Arabic Philosophy and Their Greek, Latin and Hebrew Equivalents.â The Moslem World 33 (1943): 114â28.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 934 | 159 | 16 |
| Full Text Views | 198 | 9 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 341 | 30 | 0 |
This article examines Fakhr al-DÄ«n al-RÄzÄ«âs (d. 606/1210) epistemology and his understanding of syllogistic reasoning through a consideration of Menoâs paradox. It focuses on later works, namely, al-Maá¹Älib al-Ê¿Äliya, KitÄb al-Jabr, and al-TafsÄ«r al-kabÄ«r as well as his treatment of the subject in al-Mulakhkhaá¹£ fÄ« l-ḥikma. Informed by the theories of epistemology developed through the philosophical tradition of Menoâs paradox and first principles, RÄzÄ« views all knowledge formed through syllogistic reasoning as dependent on axiomatic truths (al-badÄ«hiyyÄt), a concept with roots in both the philosophical and theological traditions. These first principles are formed immediately upon the presence of the requisite concepts in the mind, and thus comprise RÄzÄ«âs implicit response to the paradox in that all subsequent knowledge does indeed require previous fundamental knowledge that is not sought nor acquired voluntarily. Finally, the article discusses a separate paradox implicit in RÄzÄ«âs works, namely that he both asserts in sections treating divine determinism that no knowledge can in fact be acquired whatsoever while elsewhere emphasizing the fundamental importance of knowledge acquisition.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 934 | 159 | 16 |
| Full Text Views | 198 | 9 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 341 | 30 | 0 |