This article examines the high frequency of divorce among Kitan princesses during the Liao dynasty (916-1125), challenging the prevailing view that these separations reflected female autonomy. Through a philological analysis and a reconstruction of the socio-political background of each divorce, this study reveals that âdisharmonyâ (buxie) was often a euphemism for politically motivated separations orchestrated by the emperor or the court. The rigid marriage system between the Yelü imperial clan and the Xiao consort clan limited marital flexibility, making divorce a strategic tool for realigning alliances. Clan and faction struggle in the first half of the eleventh century enabled the normalization of divorce, which then profoundly influenced memorial politics at the end of the period. In the historical records, however, these separations vaguely attributed to âdisharmonyâ were misunderstood by later annalists, including the Yuan compilers of the Liaoshi, who saw them as moral failures of the Kitan regime.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 105 | 105 | 6 |
| Full Text Views | 7 | 7 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 32 | 32 | 2 |
This article examines the high frequency of divorce among Kitan princesses during the Liao dynasty (916-1125), challenging the prevailing view that these separations reflected female autonomy. Through a philological analysis and a reconstruction of the socio-political background of each divorce, this study reveals that âdisharmonyâ (buxie) was often a euphemism for politically motivated separations orchestrated by the emperor or the court. The rigid marriage system between the Yelü imperial clan and the Xiao consort clan limited marital flexibility, making divorce a strategic tool for realigning alliances. Clan and faction struggle in the first half of the eleventh century enabled the normalization of divorce, which then profoundly influenced memorial politics at the end of the period. In the historical records, however, these separations vaguely attributed to âdisharmonyâ were misunderstood by later annalists, including the Yuan compilers of the Liaoshi, who saw them as moral failures of the Kitan regime.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 105 | 105 | 6 |
| Full Text Views | 7 | 7 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 32 | 32 | 2 |