Spanning the era of the two Assads (father and son) up to 2007 (the referendum year confirming Bashar al-Assad’s continuation as president) and songs produced during the war, this study will explore the role of ‘love’ (hub) and its relation to ‘blood’ (dam) in the continuity and persistence of heroism in the national narrative. As a form of politics, love and blood have served the Baathist state in obtaining and using power and domination. This article investigates the various ways love as a political tool has been instrumentalized to legitimize the regime and construct national ties and unity. As such, this study interrogates the connection between the sacralization of the nation and the construction of love as a political and cultural tool to subject loyalty and subordination in political culture. Understanding discursive appropriations of love in this way offers a fresh perspective into the meaning—and most importantly, the politics—of love in modern Syria and its relation to Baathism, the Syrian uprising, and popular culture. In this context, the use of the term ‘love’ (hub) by the opposition has become a confirmatory tool of the regime’s illegitimacy. While ‘love’ as a political tool has been instrumentalized by the Syrian Baath regime to consolidate authority, the citizenry now faces many challenges. One of these is not only reversing this imposed ‘love’ with hate or anger towards the regime, but more importantly, rationalizing nationhood and national membership by focusing on establishing civic engagement and representation.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Aflaq, Michael. (1940). ‘Al-Qawmīya hub qabla kul shiˈ̄a’. Retrieved from http://albaath.online.fr/Volume%20I-Chapters/Fi%20Sabil%20al%20Baath-Vol%201-Ch30.htm
Aldoughli, Rahaf (2016). Revisiting Ideological Borrowings in Syrian Nationalist Narratives: Sati ‘al-Husri, Michel ‘Aflaq and Zaki al-Arsuzi. Syria Studies, 8(1): 7–39.
Aldoughli, Rahaf (2017). Interrogating the Construction of Gendered Identity in the Syrian Nationalist Narrative: al-Husari, Aflaq and al-Arsuzi. Syria Studies, 9(1): 64–120.
Aldoughli, Rahaf (2019). The Symbolic Construction of National Identity and Belonging in Syrian Nationalist Songs (from 1970 to 2007). Contemporary Levant, 4(2): 141–154.
Aldoughli, Rahaf (2019a). Interrogating the Construction of Masculinist Protection and Militarism in the Syrian Constitution of 1973. Journal of Middle East Women’s Studies, 15(1): 48–74.
Aldoughli, Rahaf (2021). What is Syrian Nationalism? Romanticism and Primordialism in the Baath Official Discourse. Nations and Nationalism (forthcoming).
al-Arsuzi. Zaki (1973). Al-ʿMuˈallafāt al-Kāmilah (The Full Work). Vol. 2. Damascus: Matabiʾ al-ʿIdara al-Siasyyia.
al-Husri, Sati (1951). Muhadarāt fi nushuʿ al-fikrah al-qawm¯ıya (Lectures on the Origin of Nationalism). Cairo: Matbaʾat al-Risalah.
al-Husri, Sati (1985a). ʿAbhāth mukhtarah fi al-qawm¯ıyah al-ʿArab¯ıya (Chosen Selection on Arab Nationalism). Vol. 1. Beirut: Markaz Dirasat al-Wihda al-ʿArabiyyah.
al-Husri, Sati (1985b). ʿA¯ʾrāʾ w dirasāt fi al-fikr al-qawm¯ı (Ideas and Studies on National Thought), edited by Muhmad al-Rumihi. 2nd ed. Damascus: Majalt al-ʾrab¯ı.
Anderson, B. (2006). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. New York and London: Verso.
Bauer, O. (1996 [1924]). The Nation. In Balakrishnan, Gopal (ed), Mapping the nation, pp. 12–40. London: Verso.
Cooke, Miriam. (2017). Dancing in Damascus: Creativity, Resilience, and the Syrian Revolution. New York: Routledge.
Dukhan, Haian. ‘My Syrian past and the privilege of a vote in Scotland at next month’s election,’ The National. April 2021.
https://www.thenational.scot/news/19257197.syrian-past-privilege-vote-scotland-next-monthselection/?fbclid=IwAR0tDxvw__HSdkHHtDcCVuS_wwj87P7cnInTX20znFMOu02PPbpwx85CrFg
Heaney, Jonathan. (2013). Emotions and Nationalism: A Reappraisal. In Demertzis, Nicolas (ed), Emotions in Politics, pp. 242–264. London: Palgrave.
Hinnebusch, Raymond. (2008). Modern Syrian Politics. History Compass, 6(1): 263–285.
Renan, Earnest. 11 Mar 1882. What is a nation? Lecture, Sorbonne University, Paris. Tr.
Saleh, Yassin al-Haj. ‘We Love You’: about politics and love. Al-Jumhuriya, January 2020. https://www.aljumhuriya.net/ar/content/منحبك-عن-السياسة-والحب
Smith, Anthony. David. (2001). Nationalism: Theory, Ideology, History. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Wedeen, Lisa. (1999). Ambiguities of Domination: Politics, Rhetoric, and Symbols in Contemporary Syria. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Your Flags Are Forever High, Oh Syria, (Rāyatik bil-ʿĀli ya Sourīya). Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iUNELQdn1w4 [Accessed 6 June 2013].
Oh, My Beloved Syria, (Sourīya ya Habeebatī). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yKli72vTPmE [Accessed 8 June 2014].
We Love You, (Minhibbāk). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KzmjdLhMeNU [Accessed 8 September 2015].
Niḥna Rijjālak Yā Bashār (We are Your Men, Bashar). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NfY0OoYQ69c
Oh Master of the Heroes (Yā sayyid al-ʾUba’), retrieved December 2, 2019, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CzIlQ7aYRiU.
We want to Preserve (Bidna Nḥāfeẓ), retrieved December 4, 2019, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Faq9qYA9Ic.
Hafez al-Assad (1973) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGSiQvV_B4U
Hafez al-Assad (1980) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tduY8lxBXFc
Bashar al-Assad (2003) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vt7hilSRH-g
BA (2005) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tVf4787e5fc
BA (2007) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6I8D9BsI_IQ
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 937 | 195 | 10 |
| Full Text Views | 140 | 11 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 282 | 22 | 0 |
Spanning the era of the two Assads (father and son) up to 2007 (the referendum year confirming Bashar al-Assad’s continuation as president) and songs produced during the war, this study will explore the role of ‘love’ (hub) and its relation to ‘blood’ (dam) in the continuity and persistence of heroism in the national narrative. As a form of politics, love and blood have served the Baathist state in obtaining and using power and domination. This article investigates the various ways love as a political tool has been instrumentalized to legitimize the regime and construct national ties and unity. As such, this study interrogates the connection between the sacralization of the nation and the construction of love as a political and cultural tool to subject loyalty and subordination in political culture. Understanding discursive appropriations of love in this way offers a fresh perspective into the meaning—and most importantly, the politics—of love in modern Syria and its relation to Baathism, the Syrian uprising, and popular culture. In this context, the use of the term ‘love’ (hub) by the opposition has become a confirmatory tool of the regime’s illegitimacy. While ‘love’ as a political tool has been instrumentalized by the Syrian Baath regime to consolidate authority, the citizenry now faces many challenges. One of these is not only reversing this imposed ‘love’ with hate or anger towards the regime, but more importantly, rationalizing nationhood and national membership by focusing on establishing civic engagement and representation.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 937 | 195 | 10 |
| Full Text Views | 140 | 11 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 282 | 22 | 0 |