Lebanonâs Parliament System as a Form of Institutionalized Hybridity
In: Middle East Law and GovernanceSearch for other papers by James Paterson in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Ben MacQueen in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
This article presents the Lebanese parliament as a form of institutionalized hybridity that offers a modicum of popular participation through highly regulated and moderated channels. It argues that the procedural nature of Lebanonâs electoral system is one that is largely, if not entirely, underscored by a closed elite bargaining process and is driven by elite preferences. This dynamic is a by-product of a power-sharing arrangement that ostensibly balances sectarian concerns, but in reality creates a disparity between political elites and the individuals within those sects which the consociational arrangement purports to include. However, this system has also created and reinforced challenges to its rule, particularly from below. With that in mind, this article highlights the evolving interactions between the entrenched, elite dominated, political system and popular protest movement and outlines how recent patterns of popular unrest present more fundamental critiques of the parliament and its central role in Lebanese politics.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1070 | 123 | 18 |
| Full Text Views | 96 | 1 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 220 | 4 | 0 |
Lebanonâs Parliament System as a Form of Institutionalized Hybridity
In: Middle East Law and GovernanceSearch for other papers by James Paterson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ben MacQueen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
This article presents the Lebanese parliament as a form of institutionalized hybridity that offers a modicum of popular participation through highly regulated and moderated channels. It argues that the procedural nature of Lebanonâs electoral system is one that is largely, if not entirely, underscored by a closed elite bargaining process and is driven by elite preferences. This dynamic is a by-product of a power-sharing arrangement that ostensibly balances sectarian concerns, but in reality creates a disparity between political elites and the individuals within those sects which the consociational arrangement purports to include. However, this system has also created and reinforced challenges to its rule, particularly from below. With that in mind, this article highlights the evolving interactions between the entrenched, elite dominated, political system and popular protest movement and outlines how recent patterns of popular unrest present more fundamental critiques of the parliament and its central role in Lebanese politics.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1070 | 123 | 18 |
| Full Text Views | 96 | 1 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 220 | 4 | 0 |
