The use of hostages as a means of guarantee was most common in the medieval period in diplomatic and military encounters. The Crusades offer an excellent opportunity to study this institution in the context of intercultural relations and conflict. After briefly considering precedent traditions in Western Europe, Byzantium, and the Islamic world, this article examines the various specific functions hostages served: as guarantors of short-term agreements, such as those for safe passage or for the end of a siege, and of longer-term undertakings, such as treaties, alliances, and promises of ransom. The siege of Acre brings together many of these various functions in a single episode. The article closes by addressing two questions: the effectiveness of hostages as a means of surety; and the role of cultural difference in determining the outcome of hostage transactions and how they were viewed by contemporaries.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1071 | 140 | 5 |
| Full Text Views | 761 | 4 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 765 | 13 | 0 |
The use of hostages as a means of guarantee was most common in the medieval period in diplomatic and military encounters. The Crusades offer an excellent opportunity to study this institution in the context of intercultural relations and conflict. After briefly considering precedent traditions in Western Europe, Byzantium, and the Islamic world, this article examines the various specific functions hostages served: as guarantors of short-term agreements, such as those for safe passage or for the end of a siege, and of longer-term undertakings, such as treaties, alliances, and promises of ransom. The siege of Acre brings together many of these various functions in a single episode. The article closes by addressing two questions: the effectiveness of hostages as a means of surety; and the role of cultural difference in determining the outcome of hostage transactions and how they were viewed by contemporaries.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1071 | 140 | 5 |
| Full Text Views | 761 | 4 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 765 | 13 | 0 |