Save

The Ethics of War: John of Naples and the Use of Muslim Mercenaries by a Christian King

In: Medieval Encounters
Authors:
Ritva Palmén Finnish Academy Research Fellow and University Lecturer, Faculty of Theology, University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland

Search for other papers by Ritva Palmén in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1137-0168
and
Mikko Posti Researcher, Helsinki Institute of Urban and Regional Studies, University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland

Search for other papers by Mikko Posti in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8938-057X
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€36.93

Abstract

This article analyzes the question by John of Naples (d. ca. 1348) as to whether it is licit for a Christian king to hire Muslim mercenaries to defend his country against Christian aggressors. John’s answer employs legal, theological, and philosophical sources intended to justify the view that it is indeed licit to do so. John’s original account modifies the just war tradition to qualify his ambitions better and adapts elements of the legal principle of necessity, which support his argument. His overall ethical thinking builds on the primacy of the common good, which allows the use of imperfect means, such as hiring Muslim mercenaries, to achieve the good of Christian community in a just war.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 413 12 0
Full Text Views 214 202 12
PDF Views & Downloads 171 149 19