Möchten Sie über diese Zeitschrift informiert bleiben? Klicken Sie bitte auf die Buttons, um unsere Alerts zu abonnieren.
Möchten Sie über diese Zeitschrift informiert bleiben? Klicken Sie bitte auf die Buttons, um unsere Alerts zu abonnieren.
This article delves into social group structures, examining them through the prism of kinship ties. At the core of our exploration is Marshall Sahlinsâs definition of kinship as âmutuality of being,â which will be elaborated towards the articleâs conclusion. We home in on the first four centuries of Islam (approximately 600â1000 CE), a pivotal era marked by shifts in social affiliations and loyalties. Initially, âmutuality of beingâ was deeply influenced by patron-client relationships, known as the Islamic patronate (walÄʾ). Yet, by the eraâs end, âmutuality of beingâ evolved to resonate more with affiliations to one of the three major Islamic currents or their subsets: Kharijite, Shiite, or Sunnite Islam. Our objective is to dissect the societal transformations during this period, from a Muslim society anchored in Arab tribal loyalty to one gravitating towards the aforementioned religious currents. We then connect these observations to Sahlinsâs kinship theory.
Kauf
Sofortzugang erwerben (PDF-Download und unbegrenzter Online-Zugang):
Institutszugang
Melden Sie sich mit Open Athens, Shibboleth oder Ihren institutionellen Anmeldedaten an.
Persönliche Anmeldung
Melden Sie sich mit Ihrem brill.com-Konto an
| Insgesamt | Letzte 365 Tage | In den letzten 30 Tagen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aufrufe von Kurzbeschreibungen | 400 | 134 | 16 |
| Gesamttextansichten | 25 | 8 | 0 |
| PDF-Downloads | 83 | 28 | 0 |
This article delves into social group structures, examining them through the prism of kinship ties. At the core of our exploration is Marshall Sahlinsâs definition of kinship as âmutuality of being,â which will be elaborated towards the articleâs conclusion. We home in on the first four centuries of Islam (approximately 600â1000 CE), a pivotal era marked by shifts in social affiliations and loyalties. Initially, âmutuality of beingâ was deeply influenced by patron-client relationships, known as the Islamic patronate (walÄʾ). Yet, by the eraâs end, âmutuality of beingâ evolved to resonate more with affiliations to one of the three major Islamic currents or their subsets: Kharijite, Shiite, or Sunnite Islam. Our objective is to dissect the societal transformations during this period, from a Muslim society anchored in Arab tribal loyalty to one gravitating towards the aforementioned religious currents. We then connect these observations to Sahlinsâs kinship theory.
| Insgesamt | Letzte 365 Tage | In den letzten 30 Tagen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aufrufe von Kurzbeschreibungen | 400 | 134 | 16 |
| Gesamttextansichten | 25 | 8 | 0 |
| PDF-Downloads | 83 | 28 | 0 |