THE ARCHAEOLOGY OF WAR AND THE 5TH C. âINVASIONSâ
äºLate Antique ArchaeologySearch for other papers by Michael Kulikowski in
Current site
Google Scholar
This paper examines the extent to which warfare is particularly characteristic of the 5th c. and whether the typical scholarly focus on barbarian invasion in this period is justified by the evidence. It then examines the ways in which archaeological and literary evidence do and do not shed light on one another in the context of 5th c. warfare, taking a series of specific examples, including the re-occupation of high places in northern Spain, the ethnic interpretation of artefacts in Mesetan cemeteries, and the evidence of violence from Late Roman Emerita Augusta.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| å ¨é¨æé´ | è¿å»ä¸å¹´ | è¿å»30天 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| æè¦æµè§æ¬¡æ° | 271 | 36 | 6 |
| å ¨ææµè§æ¬¡æ° | 108 | 0 | 0 |
| PDFä¸è½½æ¬¡æ° | 26 | 0 | 0 |
THE ARCHAEOLOGY OF WAR AND THE 5TH C. âINVASIONSâ
äºLate Antique ArchaeologySearch for other papers by Michael Kulikowski in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
This paper examines the extent to which warfare is particularly characteristic of the 5th c. and whether the typical scholarly focus on barbarian invasion in this period is justified by the evidence. It then examines the ways in which archaeological and literary evidence do and do not shed light on one another in the context of 5th c. warfare, taking a series of specific examples, including the re-occupation of high places in northern Spain, the ethnic interpretation of artefacts in Mesetan cemeteries, and the evidence of violence from Late Roman Emerita Augusta.
| å ¨é¨æé´ | è¿å»ä¸å¹´ | è¿å»30天 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| æè¦æµè§æ¬¡æ° | 271 | 36 | 6 |
| å ¨ææµè§æ¬¡æ° | 108 | 0 | 0 |
| PDFä¸è½½æ¬¡æ° | 26 | 0 | 0 |
