World literature studies is the most open field of all. In principle, it excludes nothing and no one. Things become interesting, however, when certain heroes emerge. In this article, I discuss two major influences on Pascale Casanova’s work which gave it a very distinctive position and generated new challenges. The adaptation of the sociology of Pierre Bourdieu in Casanova’s probes to what extent a theory developed to describe a predominantly national frame of reference could be transferred to the international domain. Casanova’s return to the question of the nation in her last work underlines the challenge of applying field theory in a world literature context. Casanova’s two monographs devoted to a single author, Samuel Beckett and Franz Kafka, respectively, are symptomatic for a particular kind of author in her critical work: the writer working from the semi-periphery in a way that makes a deep impact in the center.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Borges, Jorge Luis. Selected Non-Fiction. New York: Penguin, 1999.
Bourdieu, Pierre. Les Règles de l’ art: Genèse et structure du champ littéraire. Paris: Éd. du Seuil, 1992.
Bourdieu, Pierre. The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996.
Brandes, Georg. “World Literature.” In D’ Haen, Theo, César Domíguez, and Mads Rosendahl Thomsen. World Literature: A Reader. London: Routledge, 2012.
Casanova, Pascale. Beckett: L’ abstracteur: Anatomie d’ une révolution littéraire. Paris: Seuil, 1997.
Casanova, Pascale. Kafka en colère: Essai. Paris: Seuil, 2011.
Casanova, Pascale. La République mondiale des lettres. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1999.
Casanova, Pascale. La Langue mondiale: Traduction et domination. Paris: Seuil, 2015.
Casanova, Pascale. The World Republic of Letters. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2004.
Damrosch, David. What Is World Literature? Princeton, N.J.: Princeton UP, 2003.
De Swaan, Abram. Words of the World. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001.
Löffler, Sigrid. Die Neue Weltliteratur: Und Ihre Grossen Erzähler. München: Beck, 2014.
Moretti, Franco. Distant Reading. London: Verso, 2013.
Sapiro, Gisèle. “Translation and Symbolic Capital in the Era of Globalization: French Literature in the United States.” Cultural Sociology 9:3 (2015), 320–346.
Sapiro, Gisèle. “How Do Literary Works Cross Borders (or Not)? A Sociological Approach to World Literature.” Journal of World Literature 1:1 (2016), 81–96.
Thomsen, Mads Rosendahl. Mapping World Literature: International Canonization and Transnational Literatures. London: Continuum, 2008.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 490 | 73 | 6 |
| Full Text Views | 71 | 2 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 119 | 6 | 0 |
World literature studies is the most open field of all. In principle, it excludes nothing and no one. Things become interesting, however, when certain heroes emerge. In this article, I discuss two major influences on Pascale Casanova’s work which gave it a very distinctive position and generated new challenges. The adaptation of the sociology of Pierre Bourdieu in Casanova’s probes to what extent a theory developed to describe a predominantly national frame of reference could be transferred to the international domain. Casanova’s return to the question of the nation in her last work underlines the challenge of applying field theory in a world literature context. Casanova’s two monographs devoted to a single author, Samuel Beckett and Franz Kafka, respectively, are symptomatic for a particular kind of author in her critical work: the writer working from the semi-periphery in a way that makes a deep impact in the center.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 490 | 73 | 6 |
| Full Text Views | 71 | 2 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 119 | 6 | 0 |