In this article I demonstrate how a careful reading of the text of Midrash Tehillim 22 reveals a clear distinction between its different developmental layers. While we do find the identification of particular verses with Esther in the early stages of the midrash’s development, there is no reason to assume that this identification was rooted in an anti-Christian polemic. On the other hand, in the later layers of the midrash, we find clear echoes of the systematic creation of a continuous exegesis that focuses on identifying the entire Psalm with Esther. The background for this trend was a polemical confrontation with the Christian interpretation which viewed the Psalm as a prefiguration for Jesus’s crucifixion. The midrash also serves as a Jewish counter to the Christian liturgy created in the wake of the Christological reading.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Bakhos, Carol. “Method(ological) Matters in the Study of Midrash.” In Current Trends in the Study of Midrash, ed. Carol Bakhos (Leiden: Brill, 2006), 161-187.
Blaising, Craig A., and Carmen S. Hardin, eds. Psalms 1-50 (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2008).
Braude, William G. The Midrash on Psalms, 2 vols. (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1959).
Brown, Raymond E. The Death of the Messiah: From Gethsemane to the Grave: A Commentary on the Passion Narratives in the Four Gospels, 2 vols. (New York: Doubleday, 1994).
Buber, Solomon. Midrasch Tehillim (Wilna: Romm, 1891).
Carey, Holly J. Jesus’ Cry from the Cross: Towards a First-Century Understanding of the Intertextual Relationship between Psalm 22 and the Narrative of Mark’s Gospel (London: T&T Clark, 2009).
De Lagarde, Paul, Germain Morin, and Marc Adriaen, eds. Hieronymus Hebraicae quaestiones in libro Geneseos. Liber interpretationis hebraicorum nominum. Commentarioli in psalmos. Commentarius in Ecclesiasten (Turnhout: Brepols, 1959).
Dorival, Gilles, ed. David, Jésus et la reine Esther: Recherches sur le Psaume 21 (22 TM) (Leuven: Peeters, 2002).
Elbaum, Yaakov. “From Sermon to Story: The Transformation of the Akedah.” Prooftexts 6 (1986), 97-116.
Fleischer, Ezra. Eretz-Yisrael Prayer and Prayer Rituals (Jerusalem: Magnes, 1988) [Hebrew].
Fraenkel, Yonah. Darkhe ha-aggadah vehamidrash, 2 vols. (Givatayyim: Massadah and Yad Latalmud, 1991).
Heinemann, Isaac. The Methods of the Aggadah (Jerusalem: Massadah and Magnes, 1949) [Hebrew].
Heinemann, Joseph. “Profile of a Midrash: The Art of Composition in Leviticus Rabba.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 39 (1971), 141-150.
Hill, Robert C., ed. Theodore of Mopsuestia: Commentary on Psalms 1-81 (Leiden: Brill, 2006).
Hurst, David and Marc Adriaen, ed. Hieronymus Commentariorum in Matheum libri IV (Turnhout: Brepols, 1969).
Kadari, Tamar. Minkhah l’Yehudah: Julius Theodor and the Redaction of the Aggadic Midrashim of the Land of Israel (Jerusalem: Schechter, 2017), 52-78 [Hebrew].
Kohut, Alexander, ed. Arukh hashalem (New York: Pardes, 1955).
Koltun-Fromm, Naomi. “Psalm 22’s Christological Interpretive Tradition in light of Christian Anti-Jewish Polemic.” Journal of Early Christian Studies 6 (1998), 37-57.
Krauss, Samuel. Griechische und Lateinische Lehnwörter im Talmud, Midrasch und Targum (Berlin: Calvary, 1898).
Kugel, James. “Two Introductions to Midrash.” Prooftexts 3 (1983), 131-155.
Lerner, Myron B. “The Works of Aggadic Midrash and the Esther Midrashim.” In The Literature of the Sages, ed. Shmuel Safrai, Zeev Safrai, Joshua Schwartz, and Peter J. Tomson, 2 vols. (Assen: Van Gorcum; Philadelphia: Fortress, 2006), 2:133-229.
Menn, Esther M. “No Ordinary Lament: Relecture and the Identity of the Distressed in Psalm 22.” Harvard Theological Review 93 (2000), 301-341.
Moore, Carey A., ed. Daniel, Esther, and Jeremiah: The Additions (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1977).
Moore, Carey A., ed. Studies in the Book of Esther (New York: Ktav, 1982).
Neusner, Jacob. Midrash as Literature: The Primacy of Documentary Discourse (Lanham: University Press of America, 1987).
Pietersma, Albert, and Benjamin G. Wright, eds. A New English Translation of the Septuagint and the Other Greek Translations Traditionally Included under That Title (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).
Poorthuis, Marcel, ed. Mijn God, mijn God, waarom hebt gij mij verlaten: Een interdisciplinaire bundel over psalm 22 (Baarn: Ten Have, 1997).
Reizel, Anat. Introduction to the Midrashic Literature (Alon Shevut: Tevunot, 2011) [Hebrew].
Sarason, Richard S. “Toward a New Agendum for the Study of Rabbinic Midrashic Literature.” In Studies in Aggadah, Targum and Jewish Liturgy, ed. Ezra Fleischer and Jacob Petuchowski (Jerusalem: Magnes; Cincinnati: Hebrew Union College Press, 1981), 55-73.
Segal, Eliezer. The Babylonian Esther Midrash: A Critical Commentary, 3 vols. (Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1994).
Sokoloff, Michael. A Dictionary of Jewish Palestinian Aramaic of the Byzantine Period (Ramat Gan: Bar Ilan University Press, 1990).
Stein, Dina. “On the Twice-Told Tale: A Poetics of the Exegetical Narrative in Rabbinic Midrash.” Tarbiz 76 (2007), 597-604 [Hebrew].
Strack, Hermann L., and Günter Stemberger. Introduction to the Talmud and Midrash, trans. M. Bockmuehl (Minneapolis: Fortress, 1992).
Teugels, Lieve M. “The Background of the Anti-Christian Polemics in Aggadat Bereshit.” Journal for the Study of Judaism 30 (1999), 178-208.
Theodor, J., and Hanoch Albeck. Midrash bereshit rabba, 3 vols. (Jerusalem: Wahrmann, 1965).
Tkacz, Catherine B. “Esther, Jesus, and Psalm 22.” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 70 (2008), 709-728.
Wellmann, Bettina. Von David, Königin Ester und Christus: Psalm 22 im Midrasch Tehillim und bei Augustinus (Freiburg: Herder, 2007).
Zunz, Leopold. Haderashot be-Yisra’el vehishtalshelutan hahistorit, ed. and trans. Hanoch Albeck (Jerusalem: Bialik, 1974).
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 578 | 71 | 6 |
| Full Text Views | 125 | 9 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 249 | 17 | 0 |
In this article I demonstrate how a careful reading of the text of Midrash Tehillim 22 reveals a clear distinction between its different developmental layers. While we do find the identification of particular verses with Esther in the early stages of the midrash’s development, there is no reason to assume that this identification was rooted in an anti-Christian polemic. On the other hand, in the later layers of the midrash, we find clear echoes of the systematic creation of a continuous exegesis that focuses on identifying the entire Psalm with Esther. The background for this trend was a polemical confrontation with the Christian interpretation which viewed the Psalm as a prefiguration for Jesus’s crucifixion. The midrash also serves as a Jewish counter to the Christian liturgy created in the wake of the Christological reading.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 578 | 71 | 6 |
| Full Text Views | 125 | 9 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 249 | 17 | 0 |