D. Dimant, Qumran Cave 4 XXI: Parabiblical Texts, Part 4: Pseudo-Prophetic Texts (DJD 30; Oxford: Clarendon, 2001), 112. Henceforth abbreviated as Dimant, DJD 30.

D. Dimant, Qumran Cave 4 XXI: Parabiblical Texts, Part 4: Pseudo-Prophetic Texts (DJD 30; Oxford: Clarendon, 2001), 112. Henceforth abbreviated as Dimant, DJD 30.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

J. T. Milik, Ten Years of Discovery in the Wilderness of Judaea (SBT 26; London: SCM, 1959), 23-43; F. M. Cross, The Ancient Library of Qumran (3d ed.; Minneapolis: Fortress, 1995), 44.

J. T. Milik, Ten Years of Discovery in the Wilderness of Judaea (SBT 26; London: SCM, 1959), 23-43; F. M. Cross, The Ancient Library of Qumran (3d ed.; Minneapolis: Fortress, 1995), 44.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Milik, Ten Years, 139.

Milik, Ten Years, 139.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

B. A. Levine, “The Temple Scroll: Aspects of Its Historical Provenance and Literary Character,” BASOR 232 (1978): 5-23 at 7.

B. A. Levine, “The Temple Scroll: Aspects of Its Historical Provenance and Literary Character,” BASOR 232 (1978): 5-23 at 7.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

N. Golb, “The Problem of Origin and Identification of the Dead Sea Scrolls,” PAPS 124 (1980): 1-24.

N. Golb, “The Problem of Origin and Identification of the Dead Sea Scrolls,” PAPS 124 (1980): 1-24.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Y. Yadin, The Excavation of Masada 1963/64 Preliminary Report (Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society, 1965) = Israel Exploration Journal 15/1-2 (1965), 105-8; C. A. Newsom and Y. Yadin, “The Masada Fragment of the Qumran Songs of the Sabbath Sacrifice,” IEJ 34 (1984): 2-3, 77-88; C. A. Newsom, Songs of the Sabbath Sacrifice: A Critical Edition (HSS 27; Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1985), which set out on the very first page with the programmatic statement: “One must ask of every manuscript found at Qumran whether it is a composition of the Qumran community itself or a pre-Qumran composition copied and preserved in the Qumran libraries.”

Y. Yadin, The Excavation of Masada 1963/64 Preliminary Report (Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society, 1965) = Israel Exploration Journal 15/1-2 (1965), 105-8; C. A. Newsom and Y. Yadin, “The Masada Fragment of the Qumran Songs of the Sabbath Sacrifice,” IEJ 34 (1984): 2-3, 77-88; C. A. Newsom, Songs of the Sabbath Sacrifice: A Critical Edition (HSS 27; Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1985), which set out on the very first page with the programmatic statement: “One must ask of every manuscript found at Qumran whether it is a composition of the Qumran community itself or a pre-Qumran composition copied and preserved in the Qumran libraries.”)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

M. Baillet, Qumrân Grotte 4 III (4Q482-4Q520) (DJD 7; Oxford: Clarendon, 1982).

M. Baillet, Qumrân Grotte 4 III (4Q482-4Q520) (DJD 7; Oxford: Clarendon, 1982).)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

D. Dimant, “Qumran Sectarian Literature,” in Jewish Writings of the Second Temple Period (ed. M. E. Stone; CRINT 2.2; Assen: van Gorcum, 1984), 483-550. See also her review of her own position in “Israeli Scholarship on the Qumran Community,” in The Dead Sea Scrolls in Scholarly Perspective: A History of Research (ed. D. Dimant; STDJ 99; Leiden: Brill, 2012), 237-80, esp. 269-70.

D. Dimant, “Qumran Sectarian Literature,” in Jewish Writings of the Second Temple Period (ed. M. E. Stone; CRINT 2.2; Assen: van Gorcum, 1984), 483-550. See also her review of her own position in “Israeli Scholarship on the Qumran Community,” in The Dead Sea Scrolls in Scholarly Perspective: A History of Research (ed. D. Dimant; STDJ 99; Leiden: Brill, 2012), 237-80, esp. 269-70.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

F. García Martínez, “Qumran Origins and Early History: A Groningen Hypothesis,” Folia Orientalia 25 (1988): 113-36; reprinted in idem, Qumranica Minora I: Qumran Origins and Apocalypticism (ed. E. J. C. Tigchelaar; STDJ 63; Leiden: Brill, 2007), 3-29. References are to the 2007 print.

F. García Martínez, “Qumran Origins and Early History: A Groningen Hypothesis,” Folia Orientalia 25 (1988): 113-36; reprinted in idem, Qumranica Minora I: Qumran Origins and Apocalypticism (ed. E. J. C. Tigchelaar; STDJ 63; Leiden: Brill, 2007), 3-29. References are to the 2007 print.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

See on those terms C. Hempel, “The Groningen Hypothesis: Strengths and Weaknesses,” in Enoch and Qumran Origins: New Light on a Forgotten Connection (ed. G. Boccaccini; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2005), 249-55. See, in the same volume, “Part Four: The Groningen Hypothesis Revisited,” which contains other contributions by A. I. Baumgarten, M. A. Elliott, T. Elgvin, L. L. Grabbe, B. G. Wright III, T. H. Lim, S. Talmon, E. Puech, G. Boccaccini, and García Martínez himself.

See on those terms C. Hempel, “The Groningen Hypothesis: Strengths and Weaknesses,” in Enoch and Qumran Origins: New Light on a Forgotten Connection (ed. G. Boccaccini; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2005), 249-55. See, in the same volume, “Part Four: The Groningen Hypothesis Revisited,” which contains other contributions by A. I. Baumgarten, M. A. Elliott, T. Elgvin, L. L. Grabbe, B. G. Wright III, T. H. Lim, S. Talmon, E. Puech, G. Boccaccini, and García Martínez himself.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

For example, E. Tov, Scribal Practices and Approaches Reflected in the Texts Found in the Judean Desert (STDJ 54; Brill: Leiden, 2004), 46, 264 n. 339, 270, 297 explicitly states that his views on the sectarian character of specific texts follows Dimant.

For example, E. Tov, Scribal Practices and Approaches Reflected in the Texts Found in the Judean Desert (STDJ 54; Brill: Leiden, 2004), 46, 264 n. 339, 270, 297 explicitly states that his views on the sectarian character of specific texts follows Dimant.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Quote from Dimant, “Vocabulary,” 391. See further eadem, “Between Sectarian and Non-Sectarian: The Case of the Apocryphon of Joshua,” in Reworking the Bible: Apocryphal and Related Texts at Qumran (ed. E. G. Chazon et al.; STDJ 58; Leiden: Brill, 2005), 105-34; “Sectarian and Non-Sectarian Texts from Qumran: The Pertinence and Usage of a Taxonomy,” RevQ 24/93 (2009): 7-18; “Between Qumran Sectarian and Non-Sectarian Texts: The Case of Belial and Mastema,” in The Dead Sea Scrolls and Contemporary Culture: Proceedings of the International Conference Held at the Israel Museum, Jerusalem (July 6-8, 2008) (ed. A. D. Roitman, L. H. Schiffman, and S. Tzoref; STDJ 93; Leiden: Brill, 2011), 235-56.

Quote from Dimant, “Vocabulary,” 391. See further eadem, “Between Sectarian and Non-Sectarian: The Case of the Apocryphon of Joshua,” in Reworking the Bible: Apocryphal and Related Texts at Qumran (ed. E. G. Chazon et al.; STDJ 58; Leiden: Brill, 2005), 105-34; “Sectarian and Non-Sectarian Texts from Qumran: The Pertinence and Usage of a Taxonomy,” RevQ 24/93 (2009): 7-18; “Between Qumran Sectarian and Non-Sectarian Texts: The Case of Belial and Mastema,” in The Dead Sea Scrolls and Contemporary Culture: Proceedings of the International Conference Held at the Israel Museum, Jerusalem (July 6-8, 2008) (ed. A. D. Roitman, L. H. Schiffman, and S. Tzoref; STDJ 93; Leiden: Brill, 2011), 235-56.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

F. García Martínez, “¿Sectario, no-sectario, o qué? Problemas de una taxonomía correcta de los textos qumránicos,” RevQ 23/91 (2008): 383-94, at 387. A short English summary can be found in idem, “Aramaica Qumranica apocalyptica?” in Aramaica Qumranica (ed. K. Berthelot and D. Stökl Ben Ezra; STDJ 94; Leiden: Brill, 2010), 435-48 at 441-43.

F. García Martínez, “¿Sectario, no-sectario, o qué? Problemas de una taxonomía correcta de los textos qumránicos,” RevQ 23/91 (2008): 383-94, at 387. A short English summary can be found in idem, “Aramaica Qumranica apocalyptica?” in Aramaica Qumranica (ed. K. Berthelot and D. Stökl Ben Ezra; STDJ 94; Leiden: Brill, 2010), 435-48 at 441-43.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Dimant, “Vocabulary,” 355.

Dimant, “Vocabulary,” 355.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

F. García Martínez, “Beyond the Sectarian Divide: The ‘Voice of the Teacher’ as an Authority-Conferring Strategy in Some Qumran Texts,” in The Dead Sea Scrolls: Transmission of Traditions and Production of Texts (ed. S. Metso, H. Najman, and E. Schuller; STDJ 92; Leiden: Brill, 2010), 227-44 at 229.

F. García Martínez, “Beyond the Sectarian Divide: The ‘Voice of the Teacher’ as an Authority-Conferring Strategy in Some Qumran Texts,” in The Dead Sea Scrolls: Transmission of Traditions and Production of Texts (ed. S. Metso, H. Najman, and E. Schuller; STDJ 92; Leiden: Brill, 2010), 227-44 at 229.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

A. Lange with U. Mittman-Richert, “Annotated List of the Texts from the Judaean Desert Classified by Content and Genre,” in The Texts from the Judaean Desert. Indices and an Introduction to the Discoveries in the Judaean Desert Series (ed. E. Tov; DJD 39; Oxford: Clarendon, 2002), 115-64.

A. Lange with U. Mittman-Richert, “Annotated List of the Texts from the Judaean Desert Classified by Content and Genre,” in The Texts from the Judaean Desert. Indices and an Introduction to the Discoveries in the Judaean Desert Series (ed. E. Tov; DJD 39; Oxford: Clarendon, 2002), 115-64.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Dimant, “The Qumran Manuscripts,” 24 n. 4; eadem, “Vocabulary,” 357.

Dimant, “The Qumran Manuscripts,” 24 n. 4; eadem, “Vocabulary,” 357.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Dimant, “Vocabulary,” 358.

Dimant, “Vocabulary,” 358.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Dimant, “Vocabulary,” 359.

Dimant, “Vocabulary,” 359.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Dimant, “Vocabulary,” 359.

Dimant, “Vocabulary,” 359.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

D. Dimant, “The Composite Character of the Qumran Sectarian Literature as an Indication of Its Date and Provenance,” RevQ 22/88 (2006): 615-30. See, in reaction, F. García Martínez, “Reconsidering the Cave 1 Texts Sixty Years after their Discovery: An Overview,” in Qumran Cave 1 Revisited: Texts from Cave 1 Sixty Years after Their Discovery (ed. D. K. Falk et al.; STDJ 91; Leiden: Brill, 2010), 1-13, esp. 10-12.

D. Dimant, “The Composite Character of the Qumran Sectarian Literature as an Indication of Its Date and Provenance,” RevQ 22/88 (2006): 615-30. See, in reaction, F. García Martínez, “Reconsidering the Cave 1 Texts Sixty Years after their Discovery: An Overview,” in Qumran Cave 1 Revisited: Texts from Cave 1 Sixty Years after Their Discovery (ed. D. K. Falk et al.; STDJ 91; Leiden: Brill, 2010), 1-13, esp. 10-12.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

See, however, F. Zanella, “ ‘Sectarian’ and ‘Non-Sectarian’ Texts: a Possible Semantic Approach,” RevQ 24/93 (2009): 19-34, who seems to support Dimant, but actually goes on quite a different track. Zanella does not focus on the terminology of a core group of texts, but on the semantics of terms belonging to specific lexical fields. On the basis of his research on the semantic field of the substantives denoting “gift,” which showed semantic innovations that are limited to those texts that are sectarian according to Dimant’s approach, he proposes that semantic analysis can play an important heuristic role in isolating specific so-called functional languages and corpora of texts, including that of a “ ‘sectarian’ idiolect.” This kind of approach does not per se depend on specific assumptions about a Qumran sect, and could be used as an independent control of other approaches.

See, however, F. Zanella, “ ‘Sectarian’ and ‘Non-Sectarian’ Texts: a Possible Semantic Approach,” RevQ 24/93 (2009): 19-34, who seems to support Dimant, but actually goes on quite a different track. Zanella does not focus on the terminology of a core group of texts, but on the semantics of terms belonging to specific lexical fields. On the basis of his research on the semantic field of the substantives denoting “gift,” which showed semantic innovations that are limited to those texts that are sectarian according to Dimant’s approach, he proposes that semantic analysis can play an important heuristic role in isolating specific so-called functional languages and corpora of texts, including that of a “ ‘sectarian’ idiolect.” This kind of approach does not per se depend on specific assumptions about a Qumran sect, and could be used as an independent control of other approaches.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Dimant, “Sectarian and Non-Sectarian Texts from Qumran,” 18.

Dimant, “Sectarian and Non-Sectarian Texts from Qumran,” 18.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

García Martínez, “Beyond the Sectarian Divide,” 229.

García Martínez, “Beyond the Sectarian Divide,” 229.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Dimant, “Vocabulary,” 392-93.

Dimant, “Vocabulary,” 392-93.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

C. Werman, “Epochs and End-Time: The 490-Year Scheme in Second Temple Literature,” DSD 13 (2006): 229-55 and the response in Dimant, “Pseudo-Ezekiel and the Apocryphon of Jeremiah C in Perspective,” 32-35.

C. Werman, “Epochs and End-Time: The 490-Year Scheme in Second Temple Literature,” DSD 13 (2006): 229-55 and the response in Dimant, “Pseudo-Ezekiel and the Apocryphon of Jeremiah C in Perspective,” 32-35.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Dimant, “Vocabulary,” 392-93.

Dimant, “Vocabulary,” 392-93.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Kister, “Concerning the History of the Essenes,” already pointed at the correspondence between the “children” in Jub. 23:26 and the “lambs” in 1 En. 90:6.

Kister, “Concerning the History of the Essenes,” already pointed at the correspondence between the “children” in Jub. 23:26 and the “lambs” in 1 En. 90:6.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Dimant, “Between Qumran Sectarian and Non-Sectarian Texts,” 253-54.

Dimant, “Between Qumran Sectarian and Non-Sectarian Texts,” 253-54.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Davis, “Re-Presentation and Emerging Authority,” 103.

Davis, “Re-Presentation and Emerging Authority,” 103.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

García Martínez, “Beyond the Sectarian Divide,” 229.

García Martínez, “Beyond the Sectarian Divide,” 229.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用