While Daoism offers valuable insights into ecotheology, particularly in its view that nature possesses inherent dignity and serves all beings, its lack of a comprehensive account of natural evil poses a challenge to fully addressing ecological issues. Similarly, the theology of âdeep incarnationââwhich posits that Christ became flesh as a complex unity of biological components within the process of evolutionâfaces a difficulty in adequately engaging with the problem of natural evil. However, the sacramental work of Christ in restoring creation, alongside our active participation in this restoration, offers a potential framework for reconstructing Christian ecotheology.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| å ¨é¨æé´ | è¿å»ä¸å¹´ | è¿å»30天 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| æè¦æµè§æ¬¡æ° | 240 | 152 | 10 |
| å ¨ææµè§æ¬¡æ° | 18 | 13 | 1 |
| PDFä¸è½½æ¬¡æ° | 39 | 24 | 2 |
While Daoism offers valuable insights into ecotheology, particularly in its view that nature possesses inherent dignity and serves all beings, its lack of a comprehensive account of natural evil poses a challenge to fully addressing ecological issues. Similarly, the theology of âdeep incarnationââwhich posits that Christ became flesh as a complex unity of biological components within the process of evolutionâfaces a difficulty in adequately engaging with the problem of natural evil. However, the sacramental work of Christ in restoring creation, alongside our active participation in this restoration, offers a potential framework for reconstructing Christian ecotheology.
| å ¨é¨æé´ | è¿å»ä¸å¹´ | è¿å»30天 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| æè¦æµè§æ¬¡æ° | 240 | 152 | 10 |
| å ¨ææµè§æ¬¡æ° | 18 | 13 | 1 |
| PDFä¸è½½æ¬¡æ° | 39 | 24 | 2 |