Huldrych Zwingliâs understanding of original sin is usually sidelined in contemporary Reformed theology. In this paper I argue that Zwingliâs views are worthy of theological retrieval for contemporary dogmatics. His position offers a moderate version of the doctrine that has ecumenical promise. It also avoids well-known objections to some later Reformed views such as that it unjustly imputes guilt to the innocent, and the sin of one (Adam) to the many (humanity). Although there are some difficulties in Zwingliâs account, I argue that his doctrine provides a useful framework for a contemporary moderate Reformed account of original sin.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1596 | 202 | 30 |
| Full Text Views | 347 | 13 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 230 | 23 | 0 |
Huldrych Zwingliâs understanding of original sin is usually sidelined in contemporary Reformed theology. In this paper I argue that Zwingliâs views are worthy of theological retrieval for contemporary dogmatics. His position offers a moderate version of the doctrine that has ecumenical promise. It also avoids well-known objections to some later Reformed views such as that it unjustly imputes guilt to the innocent, and the sin of one (Adam) to the many (humanity). Although there are some difficulties in Zwingliâs account, I argue that his doctrine provides a useful framework for a contemporary moderate Reformed account of original sin.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1596 | 202 | 30 |
| Full Text Views | 347 | 13 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 230 | 23 | 0 |