Möchten Sie über diese Zeitschrift informiert bleiben? Klicken Sie bitte auf die Buttons, um unsere Alerts zu abonnieren.
Möchten Sie über diese Zeitschrift informiert bleiben? Klicken Sie bitte auf die Buttons, um unsere Alerts zu abonnieren.
Johannes Climacus, pseudonymous author of Kierkegaardâs Philosophical Fragments, presents to his reader the âabsolute paradox.â Though initially presented in terms of Socratic and Un-Socratic theories of knowledge, this paper argues that Climacusâ paradox is concerned with the tension between soteriological claims about human agency and divine sovereignty. Does man choose God? Or does God choose man? Though Climacus draws stark contrasts between the Socratic and the Un-Socratic, he goes to great lengths to retain them both. Through Climacusâ synthesis, Kierkegaard demonstrates his acceptance of free will and determinism as an uneasy unityâa kind of unstable equilibrium. This view of Fragments results in an emphasis on human agency that is affirmed in the broader Kierkegaardian corpus: Rather than being paralyzed by oneâs inability to fathom the absolute paradox, Kierkegaard insists that one move forward in spite of the paradox, take the leap, and do Christianity.
Kauf
Sofortzugang erwerben (PDF-Download und unbegrenzter Online-Zugang):
Institutszugang
Melden Sie sich mit Open Athens, Shibboleth oder Ihren institutionellen Anmeldedaten an.
Persönliche Anmeldung
Melden Sie sich mit Ihrem brill.com-Konto an
Timothy P. Jackson, âArminian edification: Kierkegaard on grace and free will,â in The Cambridge Companion to Kierkegaard, Alastair Hannay, Gordon Daniel Marino, eds. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997): 235â256.
Hermann Deuser, âReligious Dialectics and Christologyâ in The Cambridge Companion to Kierkegard. Alastair Hannay and Gordon Daniel Marino, eds. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997): 376.
Ibid, 9, (emphasis mine).
Ibid, 13.
Ibid, 13â15, (emphasis mine).
Ibid, 15.
Ibid, 16.
Ibid, 17.
Ibid, 17â18.
Ibid, 18.
Ibid, 18.
Ibid, 19.
Ibid, 19.
Michael Horton, The Christian Faith: A Systematic Theology for Pilgrims on The Way (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2011), 311.
Bruce, L. Shelley, âPelagius, Pelagianism,â in Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, Walter A. Elwell. (Grand Rapids: Baker Book House Company, 2001). 897.
Shelley, âPelagianismâ 898; and Richard Kyle, âSemi-Pelagianism,â in Evangelical Dictionary of Theology. Walter A. Elwell. (Grand Rapids: Baker Book House Company, 2001), 1089.
Horton, The Christian Faith, 311; Wayne Grudem, Bible Doctrine: The Essential Teachings of The Christian Faith. (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1999), 289.
J. Kenneth Grider, âArminianismâ in Evangelical Dictionary of Theology. Walter A. Elwell, ed. (Grand Rapids: Baker Book House Company, 2001): 97.
Ibid, 19.
Ibid, 42.
Ibid, 42.
Lee, Kierkegaard on Becoming and Being a Christian, 348â351.
Lee C. Barrett, Eros and Self-Emptying: The Intersections of Augustine and Kierkegaard, (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 2013), 257â258.
Ps 90:4; 2â¯Peter 3:8; Kierkegaard, Philosophical Fragments, 29.
Thomas Baldwin, âExistentialism,â in The Oxford Companion to Philosophy, Ted Honderich, ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995), 259.
Rick Anthony Furtak, âThe Kierkegaardian Ideal of âEssential Knowingâ and The Scandal of Modern Philosophyâ in Kierkegaardâs âConcluding Unscientific Postscript,â Rick Anthony Furtak, ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010): 88.
Ibid, 74.
Ibid, 72.
Ibid, 76.
Ibid, 76â77.
Martin Luther, De Servo Arbitrio âOn the Enslaved Willâ or The Bondage of The Will, (Grand Rapids: Christian Classics Ethereal Library), 7. http://www.ccel.org/ccel/luther/bondage.pdf. (accessed May 11, 2014); (emphasis mine).
Ibid, 8; (emphasis mine).
| Insgesamt | Letzte 365 Tage | In den letzten 30 Tagen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aufrufe von Kurzbeschreibungen | 588 | 89 | 11 |
| Gesamttextansichten | 205 | 4 | 0 |
| PDF-Downloads | 93 | 9 | 0 |
Johannes Climacus, pseudonymous author of Kierkegaardâs Philosophical Fragments, presents to his reader the âabsolute paradox.â Though initially presented in terms of Socratic and Un-Socratic theories of knowledge, this paper argues that Climacusâ paradox is concerned with the tension between soteriological claims about human agency and divine sovereignty. Does man choose God? Or does God choose man? Though Climacus draws stark contrasts between the Socratic and the Un-Socratic, he goes to great lengths to retain them both. Through Climacusâ synthesis, Kierkegaard demonstrates his acceptance of free will and determinism as an uneasy unityâa kind of unstable equilibrium. This view of Fragments results in an emphasis on human agency that is affirmed in the broader Kierkegaardian corpus: Rather than being paralyzed by oneâs inability to fathom the absolute paradox, Kierkegaard insists that one move forward in spite of the paradox, take the leap, and do Christianity.
| Insgesamt | Letzte 365 Tage | In den letzten 30 Tagen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aufrufe von Kurzbeschreibungen | 588 | 89 | 11 |
| Gesamttextansichten | 205 | 4 | 0 |
| PDF-Downloads | 93 | 9 | 0 |