Asprem Egil . The Problem of Disenchantment: Scientific Naturalism and Esoteric Discourse, 1900–1939. Leiden: Brill, 2014.

Asprem Egil . The Problem of Disenchantment: Scientific Naturalism and Esoteric Discourse, 1900–1939 . Leiden: Brill, 2014.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Asprem Egil . “How Schrödinger’s Cat became a Zombie: The Epidemiology of Science-Based Representations in Popular and Religious Contexts.” Method and Theory in the Study of Religion, in press.

Asprem Egil . “How Schrödinger’s Cat became a Zombie: The Epidemiology of Science-Based Representations in Popular and Religious Contexts.” Method and Theory in the Study of Religion , in press.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Drees Willem B. Religion, Science and Naturalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996)

Drees Willem B. Religion, Science and Naturalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996))| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Eddington Arthur . The Nature of the Physical World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1928.

Eddington Arthur . The Nature of the Physical World . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1928.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Elster Jon . “The Case for Methodological Individualism.” Theory and Society 11/4 (1982), 453–482.

Elster Jon . “The Case for Methodological Individualism.” Theory and Society 11/4 (1982), 453–482.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Gerth Hans H. , and Wright Mills C. . “Introduction: The Man and His Works.” In idem (trans., eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, 3–76. New York: Oxford University Press, 1946.

Gerth Hans H. and Wright Mills C. . “Introduction: The Man and His Works.” In idem (trans., eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology , 3–76. New York: Oxford University Press, 1946.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Larson Jr., James R. “Evidence for a Self-Serving Bias in the Attribution of Causality.” Journal of Personality 45/4 (1977), 430–441.

Larson Jr., James R. “Evidence for a Self-Serving Bias in the Attribution of Causality.” Journal of Personality 45/4 (1977), 430–441.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

McCauley Robert . Why Religion Is Natural and Science Is Not. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.

McCauley Robert . Why Religion Is Natural and Science Is Not . Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Radvansky Gabriel A. , and Zacks Jeffrey , Event Cognition (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2014).

Radvansky Gabriel A. and Zacks Jeffrey , Event Cognition (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2014).)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Schumpeter Joseph . “On the Concept of Social Value.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 23 (1908–1909), 213–232.

Schumpeter Joseph . “On the Concept of Social Value.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 23 (1908–1909), 213–232.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Sgarbi Marco , . “Concepts vs. Ideas vs. Problems: Historiographical Strategies in Writing History of Philosophy.” In Pozzo Riccardo , and Sgarbi Marco (eds.), Begriffs-, Ideen-, und Problemgeschichte im 21. Jahrhundert, 69–80. Wiesebaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 2011.

Sgarbi Marco . “Concepts vs. Ideas vs. Problems: Historiographical Strategies in Writing History of Philosophy.” In Pozzo Riccardo and Sgarbi Marco (eds.), Begriffs-, Ideen-, und Problemgeschichte im 21. Jahrhundert , 69–80. Wiesebaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 2011.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Sørensen Jesper , . “Past Minds: Present Historiography and Cognitive Science.” In Martin Luther H. , and Sørensen Jesper (eds.), Past Minds: Studies in Cognitive Historiography, 179–193. London and Oakville: Equinox, 2011.

Sørensen Jesper . “Past Minds: Present Historiography and Cognitive Science.” In Martin Luther H. and Sørensen Jesper (eds.), Past Minds: Studies in Cognitive Historiography, 179–193. London and Oakville: Equinox, 2011.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Taves Ann , and Asprem Egil . “Experience as Event: Event Cognition and the Study of (Religious) Experience.” Religion, Brain, and Behavior (In press).

Taves Ann and Asprem Egil . “Experience as Event: Event Cognition and the Study of (Religious) Experience.” Religion, Brain, and Behavior (In press).)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Tenbruck Friedrick H. “The Problem of Thematic Unity in the Works of Max Weber.” The British Journal of Sociology 31/3 (1980), 316–351.

Tenbruck Friedrick H. “The Problem of Thematic Unity in the Works of Max Weber.” The British Journal of Sociology 31/3 (1980), 316–351.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Weber Max , . Economy and Society. Edited by Roth Guenther , and Wittich Claus , translated by E. Fischoff et al. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.

Weber Max . Economy and Society . Edited by Roth Guenther and Wittich Claus , translated by E. Fischoff et al. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

Wilson Deirdre , and Sperber Dan . Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd., 1986.

Wilson Deirdre and Sperber Dan . Relevance: Communication and Cognition . Malden and Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd., 1986.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

 Asprem, The Problem of Disenchantment, 19.

 Asprem, The Problem of Disenchantment, 19.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

 Asprem, The Problem of Disenchantment, 317–373.

 Asprem, The Problem of Disenchantment, 317–373.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

 Arthur Eddington, The Nature of the Physical World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1928), 350.

 Arthur Eddington, The Nature of the Physical World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1928), 350.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

 Willem B. Drees, Religion, Science and Naturalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).

 Willem B. Drees, Religion, Science and Naturalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

 See Asprem, The Problem of Disenchantment, 291–298.

 See Asprem, The Problem of Disenchantment, 291–298.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

 Weber, Economy and Society, 6.

 Weber, Economy and Society, 6.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

 See especially Asprem, The Problem of Disenchantment, 556–60.

 See especially Asprem, The Problem of Disenchantment, 556–60.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

 Asprem, The Problem of Disenchantment, 29; quote from Marco Sgarbi, "Concepts vs. Ideas vs. Problems: Historiographical Strategies in Writing History of Philosophy," in Riccardo Pozzo and Marco Sgarbi (eds.), Begriffs-, Ideen-, und Problemgeschichte im 21. Jahrhundert (Wiesebaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 2011), 69–80, 76.

 Asprem, The Problem of Disenchantment, 29; quote from Marco Sgarbi, "Concepts vs. Ideas vs. Problems: Historiographical Strategies in Writing History of Philosophy," in Riccardo Pozzo and Marco Sgarbi (eds.), Begriffs-, Ideen-, und Problemgeschichte im 21. Jahrhundert (Wiesebaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 2011), 69–80, 76.)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用

 Robert McCauley, Why Religion Is Natural and Science Is Not (Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, 2011).

 Robert McCauley, Why Religion Is Natural and Science Is Not (Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, 2011).)| false
• 检索谷歌学术
• 导出引用