Examining Denmark as an Outlier
The Political Debate on Ritual Circumcision of Boys and Its Consequences for Religious Groups
In: Journal of Religion in EuropeSearch for other papers by Brian Arly Jacobsen in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
This article analyses the debates in the Danish parliament on the circumcision of boys, with a particular focus on the unprecedented discussion regarding a citizen proposal, initiated by Intact Denmark, to set a minimum age of eighteen for ritual circumcision. The study examines the empirical material comprising legislative reviews, circumcision statistics, and interviews with representatives from religious communities. It explores the intersection of religious freedom, bodily autonomy, and child welfare within Danish law, highlighting Denmark’s unique position compared to other nations. The analysis reveals the complexities of the debate, including the influence of immigration, cultural and religious practices, and political dynamics. Despite the proposal not passing, the fact that it reached a vote underscores Denmark’s evolving legal landscape concerning circumcision. The article concludes by discussing the broader implications for religious groups and future legislation in Denmark.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Abassi, Mujahed Sebastian, Mohammad Sohail Asghar, Jens-André Herbener, Morten Margolinsky, and Ian C. Skovsted. 2020. “Årelang skræmmekampagne imod omskæring er endt i chikane og tilsvining af minoriteter” [Years-long scare campaign against circumcision has resulted in harassment and abusing minorities], Politiken, 29 February.
-
Aggleton, Peter. 2007. “‘Just a Snip’? A Social History of Male Circumcision,” Reproductive Health Matters 15:29, 15–21.
-
Amar, P. 2014. “Turning the Gendered Politics of the Security State Inside Out? Charging the Police with Sexual Harassment in Egypt,” International Feminist Journal of Politics 16:2, 189–209.
-
Asghar, Mohammad Sohail. 2020. “Danske politikere må træde i karakter: Kampagne imod omskæring er endt i chikane og tilsvining af minoriteter” [Danish politicians must take a stand: campaign against circumcision has resulted in harassment and abusing minorities], Politiken.dk, 3 March.
-
Babbie, E. 2010. The Practice of Social Research, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
-
Birk, Christian. 2018. “Modstandere af omskæring vil bruge Danmark som isbryder for forbud i flere lande” [Opponents of circumcision will use Denmark as an icebreaker for bans in several countries], Kristeligt Dagblad, 22 November 2018. https://www.kristeligt-dagblad.dk/danmark/modstandere-af-omskaering-vil-bruge-danmark-som-isbryder-forbud-i-flere-lande.
-
Birk, Christian, and Mette Skov. 2015. “Trusler udelukker forsvarere for drengeomskæring fra debatten” [Threats exclude defenders of male circumcision from the debate], Kristeligt Dagblad, 23 June.
-
Blank, Susan, Michael Brady, Ellen Buerk, et al. 2012. “Circumcision Policy Statement,” Pediatrics 130:3, 585–586.
-
Bloch, Cathrine. 2021. “Der var helt stille i lokalet, da Mette Frederiksen tog ordet—og så holdt hun en skelsættende tale” [The room was completely silent when Mette Frederiksen spoke—and then she delivered a landmark speech], Berlingske, 20 April 2021. https://www.berlingske.dk/politisk-morgenpost/der-var-helt-stille-i-lokalet-da-mette-frederiksen-tog-ordet?referrer=RSS.
-
Bowen, G.A. 2009. “Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method,” Qualitative Research Journal 9:2, 27–40.
-
The Brussels Collaboration on Bodily Integrity. 2019. “Medically Unnecessary Genital Cutting and the Rights of the Child: Moving Toward Consensus,” The American Journal of Bioethics 19:10, 17–28.
-
Bryman, Alan. 2012. Social Research Methods, 4th ed, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
-
Buzan, Barry, Ole Wæver, and Jaap de Wilde. 2022. Security: A New Framework for Analysis, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
-
Carpenter, C. 2010. “On the ‘Intactivism’ of the Future: Forecasting the Longevity and Impact of Activist Challenges to Routine Neonatal Male Circumcision in the United States,” Global Discourse 1:2, 206–217.
-
Council of Europe. 2013. “Resolution 1952 (2013): Children’s Right to Physical Integrity,” Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. https://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-en.asp?fileid=20174&lang=en.
-
Creswell, J.W. 2014. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
-
Dalsbæk, Bente. 2009. Med eller uden skræl: en debatbog om drengeomskæring, Copenhagen: Broe.
-
Danish Health Data Authority. 2023. National Patient Register. https://sundhedsdatastyrelsen.dk/data-og-registre/nationale-sundhedsregistre/landspatientregisteret.
-
Darby, Robert. 2005. A Surgical Temptation: The Demonization of the Foreskin and the Rise of Circumcision in Britain, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
-
Dekkers, W. 2009. “Routine (Non-Religious) Neonatal Circumcision and Bodily Integrity: A Transatlantic Dialogue,” Kenedi Report 1:2, 204–217.
-
Denniston, George C., Frederick M. Hodges, and Marilyn Fayre Milos. 2013. Genital Cutting: Protecting Children from Medical, Cultural, and Religious Infringements: Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Circumcision, Genital Integrity and Human Rights, 29–31 July, 2010, University of California-Berkeley, Dordrecht: Springer.
-
Drivsholm, Louise Schou. 2021. “Begge fløje i forhudsfejden mener at have forskningen på sin side: Men så simpelt er det ikke” [Both sides in the foreskin feud believe they have science on their side: but it’s not that simple], Information, 27 April 2021. https://www.information.dk/indland/2021/04/begge-floeje-forhudsfejden-mener-forskningen-paa-side-saa-simpelt.
-
Egilsson, S.J. 2018. “The Proposed Ban on Male Circumcision in Iceland: Human Rights Under Siege?,” Cambridge International Law Journal 7:2, 258–268.
-
Exit Denmark. n.d. “Indlæg fra debatten om danske jøder og drengeomskæring” [Contributions from the debate on Danish Jews and male circumcision], exitdk.wordpress.com.
-
Folketingets Administration. n.d. “Borgerforslag,” https://www.borgerforslag.dk.
-
Folketinget. 2018a. “V 67 Om omskæring.” https://www.ft.dk/samling/20171/vedtagelse/v67/index.htm.
-
Folketinget. 2018b. “B 9: Forslag til folketingsbeslutning om indførelse af 18-årsmindstealder for omskæring af raske børn (borgerforslag)” [Proposal for parliamentary resolution on the introduction of a minimum age of 18 for circumcision of healthy children (citizen proposal)], https://www.ft.dk/samling/20181/beslutningsforslag/b9/index.htm.
-
Folketinget. 2023. “L 102: Forslag til lov om ændring af lov om autorisation af sundhedspersoner og om sundhedsfaglig virksomhed, sundhedsloven og lov om klage- og erstatningsadgang inden for sundhedsvæsenet” [Proposal for an act to amend the act on the authorization of healthcare professionals and healthcare activities, the health act, and the act on complaint and compensation access within the healthcare system], https://www.ft.dk/samling/20222/lovforslag/L102/BEH1-45/forhandling.htm.
-
Fox, M., and M. Thomson. 2013. “The New Politics of Male Circumcision: HIV/AIDS, Health Law and Social Justice,” Legal Studies 33:2, 255–281.
-
Frisch, Morten. 2017. “Health-Related and Sexual Consequences of Non-Therapeutic Male Circumcision in Childhood,” Journal of Sexual Medicine 14:5, e225–e225.
-
Glick, Leonard B. 2005. Marked in Your Flesh: Circumcision from Ancient Judea to Modern America, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Gollaher, David. 2000. Circumcision: A History of the World’s Most Controversial Surgery, New York: Basic Books.
-
Hansen, Mette Skov. 2015. “Trusler udelukker forsvarere for drengeomskæring fra debatten” [Threats exclude defenders of male circumcision from the debate], Kristeligt Dagblad, 23 June.
-
Hardis, Arne, and Klaus Wivel. 2020. “Husk Europas historie” [Remember Europe’s history], Weekendavisen. 10 September.
-
Heimbach-Steins, Marianne. 2013. “Religious Freedom and the German Circumcision Debate,” Working Paper, European University Institute/Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, RSCAS 2013/18.
-
Higashi, Yuko. 2023. “Autonomy, Bodily Integrity and Male Genital Cutting” in Kyoko Nakamura, Kaori Miyachi, Yukio Miyawaki, and Makiko Toda (eds.), Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting, Singapore: Springer, 159–177.
-
Israel, M., and I. Hay. 2006. Research Ethics for Social Scientists. London: Sage.
-
Jacobsen, Brian Arly. 2009. “Muslims on the Political Agenda,” Nordic Journal of Religion and Society 22:1, 15–35.
-
Jacobsen, Brian Arly. 2013. “Politics of Mainstream and Extremist Parties on Integration of Immigrants and Minorities: Denmark” in Radko Hokovský and Jiří Kopal (eds.), Politics and Policies of Integration in Austria, Hungary, Czechia, Denmark and at the EU Level, Brno: League of Human Rights and Values Think-Tank, 104–133.
-
Jacobsen, Brian Arly. 2022. “Muslimers religionsfrihed i Danmark” in Annika Hvithamar, Brian Arly Jacobsen, Morten Warmind, and Peter Birkelund Andersen (eds.). Religionssociologiske perspektiver på religion i Danmark, Højbjerg: Forlaget Univers, 91–117.
-
Jacobsen, Brian Arly, and Niels Valdemar Vinding. 2019. “Denmark” in Oliver Scharbrodt, Samim Akgönül, Ahmet Alibašić, Jørgen S. Nielsen, and Egdunas Racius (eds.), Yearbook of Muslims in Europe, Volume 11, Leiden: Brill, 199–217.
-
Judd, Robin. 2007. Contested Rituals: Circumcision, Kosher Butchering, and Jewish Political Life in Germany, 1843–1933, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
-
Justitsministeriet. 2018. “Folketingets Kirkeudvalg spørgsmål nr. 24 stillet den 28. februar 2018 til justitsministeren,” https://www.ft.dk/samling/20171/almdel/kiu/spm/24/svar/1477046/1873638.pdf.
-
Kappel, Klemens. 2016. “Omskæring af drenge og det liberale demokrati: rituel omskæring af drenge bør være lovlig,” Bibliotek for Laeger 208:2, 189–204.
-
Kamil, Carolina. 2018. “Omskæringsdebatten: derfor vil den aldrig dø” [The circumcision debate: why it will never die], Berlingske, 27 April. https://www.berlingske.dk/samfund/goddag-mand-oekseskaft-derfor-vil-omskaeringdebatten-aldrig-doe
-
Københavns Universitet. 2023. Kodeks for god videnskabelig praksis, Copenhagen: Københavns Universitet.
-
Krasnik, Martin. 2014. Fucking jøde!, Copenhagen: Bianco Luno.
-
Lind, Laura Elisabeth. 2008. “Politikere åbner for at forbyde omskæring” [Politicians open up to banning circumcision], Kristeligt Dagblad, 18 November 2008. https://www.kristeligt-dagblad.dk/religion-og-etik/politikere-%C3%A5bner-forbyde-omsk%C3%A6ring.
-
Malacinski, Leny. 2015. “Den der lever stille” [The quiet life], Weekendavisen, 2 January.
-
Marquardt, Freje. 2019. “Unge jøder føler sig pressede: Der er sket et skred” [Young Jews feel pressured: there has been a slide], Berlingske, 31 May.
-
Morris, B.J., R.G. Wamai, E.B. Henebeng, A.A.R. Tobian, J.D. Klausner, and J. Banerjee. 2016. “Estimation of Country-Specific and Global Prevalence of Male Circumcision,” Population Health Metrics 14(4).
-
Putzke, H. 2012. “After Cologne: Male Circumcision and the Law; Parental Right, Religious Liberty or Criminal Assault?,” Journal of Medical Ethics 38:7, 444–449.
-
Skov, Christian Egander. 2018. “Den skingre omskæringsdebat er oplysningstidens arv” [The shrill circumcision debate is a legacy of the Enlightenment], Kristeligt Dagblad, 16 January 2018.
-
Slyngborg, Camilla, and Christian Krabbe Barfoed. 2020. “Partier kræver forbud mod omskæring af drenge: Stort flertal af danskere enige” [Parties demand a ban on male circumcision: Vast majority of Danes agree], TV2, 1 September 2020. https://nyheder.tv2.dk/samfund/2020-09-01-partier-kraever-forbud-mod-omskaering-af-drenge-stort-flertal-af-danskere-enige.
-
Socialdemokratiet. 2018. “Socialdemokratiet er principielt modstander af omskæring af mindreårige” [Socialdemokratiet is fundamentally opposed to the circumcision of minors], Adopted at the Social Democrats’ congress, 23 September.
-
Statistics Denmark. 2024. “Fertilitet,” https://www.dst.dk/da/Statistik/emner/borgere/befolkning/fertilitet.
-
Staun, Susanne. 2018. “De intakte og de omskårne: krigen om ordene” [The intact and the circumcised: the war of words], Politiken, 8 May. https://politiken.dk/debat/kroniken/art6496962/Alle-kneb-gælder-åbenbart-når-folkestemningen-mod-omskæring-skal-skabes.
-
Strode, Ann, Catherine Slack, and Zaynab Essack. 2010. “Child Consent in South African Law: Implications for Researchers, Service Providers and Policy-Makers,” SAMJ: South African Medical Journal 100:4, 247–249.
-
Styrelsen for Patientsikkerhed. 2020. Ikke-terapeutisk omskæring af drenge [Non-therapeutic circumcision of boys], Copenhagen: Styrelsen for Patientsikkerhed.
-
Sundhedsstyrelsen. 2013. Omskæring af drenge: Notat [Circumcision of boys: memorandum] Sundhedsstyrelsen (Danish Health Authority).
-
Sundhedsstyrelsen. 2014. “Vejledning om omskæring af drenge” [Guidelines on male circumcision], Sundhedsstyrelsen (Danish Health Authority), 10 April, https://sundhedsstyrelsen.dk/da/nyheder/2014/vejledning-om-omskaering-af-drenge.
-
Sundhedsudvalget. 2021. “Offentligt SUU Alm.del: endeligt svar på spørgsmål 77” [Public SUU Alm.del: final response to question 77]. https://www.ft.dk/samling/20241/almdel/suu/spm/77/svar/2088634/2936921.pdf.
-
Svendsen, Anders Byskov, Rasmus Bøttcher, Morten Henriksen, and Søren Larsen. 2021. “Tungt internationalt pres på Danmark før Mette Frederiksens afgørende beslutning om omskæring” [Heavy international pressure on Denmark before Mette Frederiksen’s decisive decision on circumcision], DR.dk, 18 April 2021. https://www.dr.dk/nyheder/politik/tungt-internationalt-pres-paa-danmark-foer-mette-frederiksens-afgoerende-beslutning.
-
Svoboda, J. Steven. 2013. “Promoting Genital Autonomy by Exploring Commonalities between Male, Female, Intersex, and Cosmetic Female Genital Cutting,” Global Discourse 3:2, 237–255.
-
Svoboda, J.S., and R.S. Van Howe. 2013. “Out of Step: Fatal Flaws in the Latest AAP Policy Report on Neonatal Circumcision,” Journal of Medical Ethics 39:7, 434–441.
-
Townsend, Kate Goldie. 2020. “The Child’s Right to Genital Integrity,” Philosophy & Social Criticism 46:7, 878–898.
-
Townsend, Kate Goldie. 2023. “Defending an Inclusive Right to Genital and Bodily Integrity for Children,” International Journal of Impotence Research 35:1, 27–30.
-
TV2. 2021. Omskæring bag lukkede døre [Circumcision behind closed doors], 14 October. https://play.tv2.dk/program/omskaering-bag-lukkede-doere-c582a9ab-ef72-467a-a4a4-dad9e397c6ca
-
Werner, Micha H. 2014. “Körpergrenzen und öffentliche Gründe” in Martin Langanke, Andreas Ruwe, and Henning Theißen (eds.), Rituelle Beschneidung von Jungen: Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven, Leipzig: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt, 214–236.
-
WHO. 2007. Male Circumcision: Global Trends and Determinants of Prevalence, Safety, and Acceptability, Geneva: World Health Organization.
-
Zuckerman, Maja Gildin, and Jakob Egholm Feldt. 2023. “The Eternally Rescued: The Jews and the Boundaries of Danish Civility,” American Journal of Cultural Sociology 11:2, 293–315.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 398 | 353 | 12 |
| Full Text Views | 22 | 22 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 55 | 55 | 0 |
Examining Denmark as an Outlier
The Political Debate on Ritual Circumcision of Boys and Its Consequences for Religious Groups
In: Journal of Religion in EuropeSearch for other papers by Brian Arly Jacobsen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
This article analyses the debates in the Danish parliament on the circumcision of boys, with a particular focus on the unprecedented discussion regarding a citizen proposal, initiated by Intact Denmark, to set a minimum age of eighteen for ritual circumcision. The study examines the empirical material comprising legislative reviews, circumcision statistics, and interviews with representatives from religious communities. It explores the intersection of religious freedom, bodily autonomy, and child welfare within Danish law, highlighting Denmark’s unique position compared to other nations. The analysis reveals the complexities of the debate, including the influence of immigration, cultural and religious practices, and political dynamics. Despite the proposal not passing, the fact that it reached a vote underscores Denmark’s evolving legal landscape concerning circumcision. The article concludes by discussing the broader implications for religious groups and future legislation in Denmark.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 398 | 353 | 12 |
| Full Text Views | 22 | 22 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 55 | 55 | 0 |
