A Pastafarian Heart in a Catholic Body
The Italian Pastafarian Church as a Test for the “Definitional Issues”
In: Journal of Religion in EuropeSearch for other papers by Stefania Palmisano in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Jacopo Ranzato in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
In recent decades, sociology has struggled with the definition of “religion.” Along with other authors that addressed the matter, we believe these “definitional issues” can be tackled by adopting a contextual, qualitative perspective on religion, which we employ to describe the activities of the Italian Pastafarian Church (IPC). IPC’s core elements are an undeniable expression of the Italian discourse on religion; therefore, our aim is to prove how this Pastafarian movement should be rightfully considered a religion within the Italian religious discourse. By scaling down the scope of our analysis, we show that the limitation of functional and substantial definitions can be overcome if one drops the claim to describe religion in universal, taxonomic terms. Overcoming this claim means, in our view, rethinking the concept of religion from a contextual perspective that considers the specificities assumed by religious discourse within the researcher’s specific field of study.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Alberts, Thomas. 2008. “Fake Religions and Problems of Authenticity in Religion,” Culture and Religion: An Interdisciplinary Journal 9:2, 125–139.
-
Aldridge, Alan. 2000. La religione nel mondo contemporaneo, Cambridge: Polity Press.
-
Bauman, Zygmunt. 2000. Liquid Modernity, Cambridge: Polity Press.
-
Beckford, James A. 2003. Social Theory and Religion, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Bernini, Lorenzo. 2016. “La ‘teoria del gender,’ i ‘negazionisti’ e la ‘fine della differenza sessuale,’” About Gender: International Journal of Gender Studies 5:10, 367–381.
-
Brauer, Simon. 2018. “The Surprising Predictable Decline of Religion in the United States,” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 57:4, 654–675.
-
Bracke, Sarah, and David Paternotte. 2016. “Unpacking the Sin of Gender,” Religion & Gender 6:2, 143–154.
-
Beckford, James A. 2001. “The Construction and Analysis of Religion,” Social Compass 48:3, 439–441.
-
Beyer, Peter. 2013. “Questioning the Secular/ Religious Divide in a Post-Westphalian World,” International Sociology 28:6, 663–679.
-
Branch, Glenn, and Eugenie C. Scott. 2006. Not in our Classrooms: Why Intelligent Design Is Wrong for Our Schools, Boston: Beacon Press.
-
Casanova, José. 2013. “Religious Associations, Religious Innovations and Denominational Identities in Contemporary Global Cities,” in José Casanova (ed.), Topographies of Faith: Religion in Urban Spaces. Leiden: Brill, 113–127.
-
Chidester, David. 2005. Authentic Fakes: Religion and American Popular Culture, London: University of California Press.
-
Cusack, Carole. 2010. Invented Religions: Imagination, Fiction and Faith, Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Company.
-
Davidsen, Markus A. 2013. “Fiction-Based Religion: Conceptualising a New Category Against History-Based Religion and Fandom,” Culture and Religion: An Interdisciplinary Journal 14:4, 378–395.
-
De Groot, Kees. 2008. “Three Types of Liquid Religion,” Implicit Religion: Journal for the Critical Study of Religion 11:3, 277–296.
-
Durkheim, Emile. 2008. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life, New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Ervas, Elena. 2017. “The Agreements Between Church and State: The Italian Perspective,” BYU Law Review 4:6, 869–894.
-
Ferrari, Alessandro. 2010. “Civil Religion in Italy: A “Mission Impossible”?,” George Washington International Review 41:4, 839–859.
-
Ferrari, Alessandro. 2011. “Libertà religiosa e nuove presenze confessionali (ortodossi e islamici): tra cieca deregulation e super-specialità, ovvero del difficile spazio per la differenza religiosa,” Stato, Chiese e pluralismo confessionale July, 1–28.
-
Ferrari, Alessandro, and Silvio Ferrari. 2015. “Religion and the Secular State: The Italian Case,” in Javier Martínez-Torrón (ed.), Religion and the Secular State: National Reports, Madrid: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Facultad de Derecho, Universitad Complutense, 445–465.
-
Forrest, Barbara, and Paul R. Gross. 2004. Creationism’s Trojan Horse: The Wedge of Intelligent Design, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Fuller, Robert C. 2001. Spiritual but not Religious, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Giorgi, Alberta. 2018. Religioni di minoranza tra Europa e laicità locale, Milan: Mimesis Edizioni.
-
Giorgi, Alberta, and Pasquale Annicchino. 2017. “‘Genuine’ Religions and their Arena of Legitimation in Italy: The Role of the ECtHR,” Religion, State & Society, 45:3–4, 284–296.
-
Griera, Mar, and Marian Burchardt. 2020. “Urban Regimes and the Interaction Order of Religious Minority Rituals,” Ethnic and Racial Studies 44:10, 1712–1733.
-
Heelas, Paul. 1996. The New Age Movement: The Celebration of the Self and the Sacralisation of Modernity, Oxford: Blackwell.
-
Henderson, Bobby. 2006. The Gospel of the Flying Spaghetti Monster, New York: Villard.
-
Hjelm, Titus, Essi Mäkelä, and Jussi Sohlberg. 2018. “What do we Talk About When we Talk About Legitimate Religion? Failure and Success in the Registration of two Pagan Communities in Finland,” in George D. Chryssides (ed.), Minority Religions in Europe and the Middle East, London: Routledge, 125–141.
-
Hunt, Stephen J. 2005. Religion and Everyday Life, London: Routledge.
-
Knobel, Michele, and Colin Lankshear. 2007. “Online Memes, Affinities, and Cultural Production,” in Michele Knobel and Colin Lankshear (eds.), A New Literacies Sampler, Bern: Peter Lang Publishers, 199–227.
-
Laycock, Joseph. 2013. “Laughing Matters: ‘Parody Religions’ and the Command to Compare,” Bulletin for the Study of Religion 42:3, 19–26.
-
Lavizzari, Anna, and Massimo Prearo. 2018. “The Anti-Gender Movement in Italy: Catholic Participation Between Electoral and Protest Politics,” European Societies 21:3, 422–442.
-
Lehtinen, Hanna. 2018. “Counterreligion? The Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster and Shifting Discourse on Religion,” PhD thesis, University of Turku.
-
Madsen, Richard. 2012. “What Is Religion? Categorical Reconfigurations in a Global Horizon,” in Philip S. Gorski, David Kyuman Kim, John Torpey, and Jonathan VanAntwerpen (eds.), The Post-Secular in Question: Religion in Contemporary Society, New York: New York University Press, 23–42.
-
Mäkelä, Essi, and Johanna J.M. Petsche. 2013. “Serious Parody: Discordianism as Liquid Religion,” Culture and Religion 14:4, 411–423.
-
Martin, Craig. 2009. “On the Origin of the ‘Private Sphere’: A Discourse Analysis of Religion and Politics from Luther to Locke,” Temenos 45:2, 143–178.
-
Martin, Nick. 2020. “Exemptions, Sincerity and Pastafarianism,” Journal of Applied Philosophy 37:2, 258–272.
-
Masuzawa, Tomoko. 2005. The Invention of World Religions: Or, How European Universalism Was Preserved in the Language of Pluralism, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
-
Owens, Susan. 2018. “The Problem with Paganism in Charity Registration in England and Wales,” Implicit Religion—Journal for the Critical Study of Religion 21:3, 271–284.
-
Palmisano, Stefania, and Nicola Pannofino. 2021. Religione Sotto Spirito—viaggio nelle nuove spiritualità, Milan: Mondadori Education.
-
Pennock, Robert T. 2001. Intelligent Design Creationsm and its Critics: Philosophical, Theological, and Scientific Perspectives, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
-
Possamai, Adam. 2012. Handbook of Hyper-Real Religions, Leiden: Brill.
-
Prearo, Massimo. 2019. “Family Day, movimenti e mobilitazioni anti-gender: un progetto politico neocattolico,” Genesis: rivista della società italiana delle storiche XVIII:1, 21–43.
-
Prearo, Massimo. 2020. L’ipotesi neocattolica: politologia dei movimenti anti-gender, Milan: Mimesis Edizioni.
-
Ranzato, Jacopo. 2020a. “Le Tagliatelle in Piedi a tutela della famiglia tradizionale pastafariana: Un’indagine sulle connessioni tra attivismo politico e religioso nel tessuto urbano italiano,” Quaderni di Studi e Materiali di Storia delle Religioni 26, 233–258.
-
Ranzato, Jacopo. 2020b. “Pirati, Pannocchie e Frescovi: il pastafarianesimo italiano tra l’aggregazione digitale e l’attivismo urbano,” in Michele Olzi and Roberto Revello (eds.), Religioni & Media: un’introduzione ad alcune problematiche, Milan: Mimesis edizioni, 265–280.
-
Ranzato, Jacopo. 2022. “La lente pastafariana: un’indagine etnografica tra i fedeli italiani del Prodigioso Spaghetto Volante,” PhD thesis, La Sapienza Università di Roma.
-
Scappini, Ettore. 2021. “Is There Really ‘Another’ Counterexample to the Secularization Thesis? Religious Dynamics in Italy Between 1910 and 2013,” Review of Religious Research 64, 103–126.
-
Scott, Eugenie C., and Nicholas J. Matzke. 2007. “Biological Design in Science Classrooms,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104:1, 8669–8676.
-
Smith, Christian. 2017. Religion: What it is, How it Works and Why it Matters, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
-
Spikard, James V. 2017. Alternative Sociologies of Religion Through Non-Western Eyes, New York: New York University Press.
-
Staeheli, Lynn A. 2009. “Making Publics: Immigrants, Regimes of Publicity and Entry to ‘the Public,’” Society and Space 27:4, 633–648.
-
Swatos, William H. 1983. “Enchantment and Disenchantment in Modernity: The Significance of ‘Religion’ as a Sociological Category,” Sociological Analysis 44:4, 321–337.
-
Taira, Teemu. 2006. Notkea Uskonto [Liquid religion], Tampere: Eetos.
-
Taira, Teemu. 2013. “The Category of ‘Invented Religion’: A New Opportunity for Studying Discourses on ‘Religion,’” Culture and Religion: An Interdisciplinary Journal 14:4, 477–493.
-
Taira, Teemu. 2016. “Discourse on Religion in Organizing Social Practices: Theoretical and Practical Considerations,” in Kocku Von Stuckrad and Frans Wijsen (eds.), Making Religion: Theory and Practice in the Discursive Study of Religion, Leiden: Brill, 125–146.
-
Tremlett, Paul-Francois. 2013. “The Problem with the Jargon of Inauthenticity: Towards a Materialist Repositioning of the Analysis of Postmodern Religion,” Culture and Religion: An Interdisciplinary Journal 14:4, 463–476.
-
Tylor, E.B. 1903. Primitive Culture: Research into the Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Language, Art, and Custom, Vol. 1, 4th edn, London: John Murray.
-
Vezzoni, Cristiano, and Ferruccio Biolcati-Rinaldi. 2015. “Church Attendance and Religious Change in Italy, 1968–2010: A Multilevel Analysis of Pooled Datasets,” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 54:1, 100–118.
-
Voas, David, and Mark Chaves. 2016. “Is the United States a Counterexample to the Secularization Thesis?,” American Journal of Sociology 121:5, 1517–1556.
-
Wilcox, Melissa M. 2018. Queer Nuns: Religion, Activism, and Serious Parody, New York: New York University Press.
-
Woodhead, Linda. 2011. “Five Concepts of Religion,” International Review of Sociology 21:1, 121–143.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 322 | 200 | 6 |
| Full Text Views | 16 | 12 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 37 | 26 | 2 |
A Pastafarian Heart in a Catholic Body
The Italian Pastafarian Church as a Test for the “Definitional Issues”
In: Journal of Religion in EuropeSearch for other papers by Stefania Palmisano in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jacopo Ranzato in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
In recent decades, sociology has struggled with the definition of “religion.” Along with other authors that addressed the matter, we believe these “definitional issues” can be tackled by adopting a contextual, qualitative perspective on religion, which we employ to describe the activities of the Italian Pastafarian Church (IPC). IPC’s core elements are an undeniable expression of the Italian discourse on religion; therefore, our aim is to prove how this Pastafarian movement should be rightfully considered a religion within the Italian religious discourse. By scaling down the scope of our analysis, we show that the limitation of functional and substantial definitions can be overcome if one drops the claim to describe religion in universal, taxonomic terms. Overcoming this claim means, in our view, rethinking the concept of religion from a contextual perspective that considers the specificities assumed by religious discourse within the researcher’s specific field of study.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 322 | 200 | 6 |
| Full Text Views | 16 | 12 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 37 | 26 | 2 |
