Among the Qurʾanic exegesis streams that have emerged due to social changes and current developments in human civilisation, such as [specific social changes and developments], are the social literary (tafsÄ«r al-adabÄ« al-ijtimÄʿī) stream and the hermeneutic. Both streams have their framework, phase, and factor from the time of their emergence and have their position in the method of Qurʾanic exegesis. This study discusses these two streams as a central debate in line with the historical and philosophical correlation of the evolution from classical to modern interpretations from various perspectives and in the context of the Islamic and Western world. This qualitative study used library research and comparative study on the social literary stream and hermeneutic, supported by other related written materials. The study finds that the social literary stream and hermeneutics differ in origin and methodology. The social literary stream is an interpretation that discusses Qurʾanic verses with the aesthetic value of language literature and its correlation with the elements of society. It can solve problems, counter hostility towards Islam, and treat diseases that exist in society with the guidance of the Qurʾan. Hermeneutic is a method of interpreting or expressing meaning in a text, originally referring to the Bible, originated from Greek mythology, which then developed in Christian culture and is now beginning to influence the method of interpreting the Quran. It is unsuitable for interpreting the Qurʾan because it would raise doubts (skepticism and relativism) about the equation of the Qurʾanic text with ordinary texts.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
ʿAbduh, Tafsir Juz ʿAmma: Juz ʿAmma wa Tafsiruhu, trans. Muhammad Bagir, Bandung, Mizan Publishers, 1998.
Abd Ghafir, âSekilas Mengenal at-Tafsir al-Adabi al-IjtimaÊ¿iâ, Journal of al-Ahkam: Journal of SyariÊ¿ah and Law 1, no. 1, JanuaryâJune, (2016), pp. 25â34. https://doi.org/10.22515/alahkam.v1i1.102.
Ahmad Hilmi, A. B., bin Amir, S., Saleh, M. H., Sulaiman, A., âFuzzy Delphi Method Application in Developing Methodology for Integrating Memorised Quranic Verses with Aqli Knowledge Based on Quranic Exegesisâ. AlBayan Journal, 21(2), (2023), pp. 159â178. https://doi.org/10.1163/22321969-20230130.
Achmad Khudori Soleh, âMembandingkan Hermeneutika dengan Ilmu Tafsir,â Tsaqafah Journal 7, no. 1, (2011), pp. 31â50. https://doi.org/10.21111/tsaqafah.v7i1.106.
Ahmad Kali Akbar, âHermeneutics versus Taʾwil (Comparative Study),â Kalimah Journal, 13 March, (2015), pp. 45â62. https://doi.org/10.21111/klm.v13i1.278.
Ahmad Nabil et al., âMuhammad Abduhâs Influence in Southeast Asiaâ, Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research 13 Mathematical Applications in Engineering, (2013), pp. 124â138. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2013.13.mae.10004.
Ahmad Zaki Mubarok, âHermeneutic Approach: A Study of Muhammad Syahrurâs Thought in the Book of al-Kitab wa al-Qurʾan Qiraʾah Musirahâ (master dissertation, Department of Quran and al-Hadith, Academy of Islamic Studies of the University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 2010).
Al-Ê¿Ak, KhÄlid Ê¿Abd al-RaḥmÄn, Uṣūl al-TafsÄ«r wa QawÄÊ¿iduhu, Beyrut, DÄr al-NafÄʾis, 1986.
Al-Dhahabī, Al-Tafsīr wa al-Mufassirūn, Kaherah, Maktabah Wahbah, 2003.
Al-GhazalÄ«, Muḥammad, Kayf NataÊ¿Ämal MaÊ¿a al-QurʾÄn, Mansurah, Dar al-Wafaʾ, 1992.
Al-GhazalÄ«, Muḥammad, Kayf NataÊ¿Ämal MaÊ¿a al-QurʾÄn, trans. Mardiyah Syamsuddin, Kuala Lumpur: Jasmin Enterprise, 1998.
Al-KhÄlidÄ«, á¹¢alÄḥ Ê¿Abd al-Fattah, TaÊ¿rÄ«f al-DÄrisÄ«n bi ManÄhij al-MufassirÄ«n, Dimashq, DÄr al-Qalam, 2012.
Al-QattÄn, MannÄÊ¿, MabÄhith fÄ« Ê¿UlÅ«m al-QurʾÄn, RiyÄá¸, Maktabah al-MaÊ¿Ärif li an-Nashr wa al-Tawzīʿ, 2000, 384.
Amir, Selamat, Muhamad Alihanafiah Norasid, and Ahmad Bazli Ahmad Hilmi, âScientific Studies of the QurʾÄn in the Contemporary Era: An Analysis of Concept, History, and Methodologyâ. Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization 13 (1), (2023), https://doi.org/10.32350/jitc.131.13.
Amir, S. B., Noor, M. M. M., & Hilmi, A. B. A., âScientific Assimilation In The Interpretation Of The QurʾÄn: An Approach To ZaghlÅ«l El-NajjÄrâs Work Entit Led TafsÄ«r Al-Ayah Al-KawnÄ«yyah FÄ« Al-QurʾÄn Al-KarÄ«mâ, Al-Bayan: Journal of Qurʾan and Hadith Studies, 10(2), (2012), pp. 52â54. https://doi.org/10.11136/jqh.1210.02.04.
Hamka, Tafsir al-Azhar, Changi Road, Pustaka Nasional Pte Ltd, 2012.
Hilmi, A. B. A., Saleh, M. H., Sulaiman@mohamad, A., Amir, S., âIntegrating The Quran with The Acquired Knowledge: A Need Analysis for Developing a Model in Kolej Permata Insan.â International Journal of Religion, 5(9), (2024), pp. 25â66. https://doi.org/10.61707/ae6mzz32.
Khairuddin Said, Thought of Islah Yusuf Ahmad Lubis, Kuala Lumpur, University of Malaya Publisher, 2012.
Khalif Muammar, In the Name of Truth: A Critical Response to Liberal Islamic Discourse, Kajang, Akademi Kajian Ketamadunan, 2006.
Malik Bennabi, The Phenomenon of the Quran, trans. Rosiyah Abd. Latif, Kuala Lumpur, National Translation Institute, 2008.
Mamat S Burhanuddin, Hermeneutics of the Qurʾan Ala Pesantren: Analysis of Tafsir Marah Labid by K. H Nawawi Banten, Yogyakarta, UII Press, 2006.
Mohd Kamil Hj Abd. Majid, âSkop, Sejarah Dan Aliran Pemikiran Islamâ. Jurnal Usuluddin, 5 (June), 2017, pp. 111â136. https://ejournal.um.edu.my/index.php/JUD/article/view/3166.
Mohd Najib Abdullah, Manhaj Tokoh-Tokoh Tafsir, Bangi, UKM Publisher, 2015.
Muḥammad ʿAbduh, Juz ʿAmma wa Tafsīruhu, Al-Fajjalah, Maktabah Misr, 1993.
Muhammad ʿAfif al-Din Dimyati, ʿIlm al-Tafsir: Usuluhu wa Manahijuhu, Sidorjo, Maktabah Lisan ʿArabiy, 2016.
Muḥammad IbrÄhim SharÄ«f, IttijÄhÄt al-TajdÄ«d fÄ« TafsÄ«r al-QurʾÄn al-KarÄ«m, Alexandria, DÄr al-Salam, 2008.
Muhammad Rashid Rida, Tafsir al-Qurʾan al-Hakim or Tafsir al-Manar, Kaherah, Maktabah al-Qahirah, t.t.
Muliono R, Slamet. âHermeneutika Al-Qurʾan: Antara Pemaknaan Tekstual Dan Kontekstualâ. Ulumuna 14 (1), (2017), pp. 101â120. https://doi.org/10.20414/ujis.v14i1.229.
Norasid, M. A. b., Abdullah, M. b., & Amir, S. b., âAbdul Hadi Awangâs Moderation of Thought (Wasatiyyah) on Nationhood Discourse through the Interpretation of the Quranâ, Al-Bayan: Journal of Qurʾan and Hadith Studies, 20(2), (2022), pp. 267â290. https://doi.org/10.1163/22321969-12340116.
Rifʾatul Khoiriah Malik, âHermeneutics of the Qurʾan and the Modern Tafsir Debate: Its Implementation with the Presentâ, At-TurÄṡ: Journal of Islamic Studies, Volume 6, No. 1, JanuaryâJune (2019), pp. 56â76. https://doi.org/10.33650/at-turas.v6i1.583.
Rudy Alhana, Considering the Hermeneutic Paradigm in Interpreting the Qurʾan, Surabaya, PT. Revka Petra Media, 2014.
Selamat Amir et al., Revealing the Scientific Prospects of the Quran: A Review of the Al-Ilmi Al-Naqli Al-Ijtima ie Method In Highlighting the Greatness of the Quran, Focusing on Selected Verses In Tafsir Al-ShaÊ¿wi, Proceedings of The 4th International Qurʾanic Conference 2014, organised by the Centre of Qurʾanic Research (CQR) of the University of Malaya Kuala Lumpur on 14â15 March 2014.
Syafrijal, âInterpretation of Polygamy Verses in Tafsir al-Manar (Hermeneutic Studies)â (undergraduate dissertation, Imam Bonjol Padang State Islamic Institute, 2013).
Tengku Intan Zarina bt Tengku Puji, âLiberal Islamic Criticism of the Interpretation of the Qurʾan: Focus on Some Issues in the Ê¿Ulum al-Qurʾanâ (doctoral thesis, Department of Quran and al-Hadith of the Academy of Islamic Studies of the University of Malaya, 2013).
Tengku Intan Zarina Tengku Puji and Mazlan Ibrahim, âHermeneutic Approach in the Interpretation of the Quran,â in Distortion in Tafsir al-Quran (Bangi: Publisher of Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 2017).
Ugi Suharto, âDoes the Qurʾan Need Hermeneutics?â Journal of Usuluddin 17, July, (2013), pp. 123â136.
Wan Mohd Khairul Firdaus Wan Khairuldin and Abdul Hanis Embong, History of Tafsir al-Quran & Contemporary Tafsir Streams, Terengganu: UniSZA Publisher, 2017.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 700 | 258 | 16 |
| Full Text Views | 13 | 7 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 29 | 12 | 0 |
Among the Qurʾanic exegesis streams that have emerged due to social changes and current developments in human civilisation, such as [specific social changes and developments], are the social literary (tafsÄ«r al-adabÄ« al-ijtimÄʿī) stream and the hermeneutic. Both streams have their framework, phase, and factor from the time of their emergence and have their position in the method of Qurʾanic exegesis. This study discusses these two streams as a central debate in line with the historical and philosophical correlation of the evolution from classical to modern interpretations from various perspectives and in the context of the Islamic and Western world. This qualitative study used library research and comparative study on the social literary stream and hermeneutic, supported by other related written materials. The study finds that the social literary stream and hermeneutics differ in origin and methodology. The social literary stream is an interpretation that discusses Qurʾanic verses with the aesthetic value of language literature and its correlation with the elements of society. It can solve problems, counter hostility towards Islam, and treat diseases that exist in society with the guidance of the Qurʾan. Hermeneutic is a method of interpreting or expressing meaning in a text, originally referring to the Bible, originated from Greek mythology, which then developed in Christian culture and is now beginning to influence the method of interpreting the Quran. It is unsuitable for interpreting the Qurʾan because it would raise doubts (skepticism and relativism) about the equation of the Qurʾanic text with ordinary texts.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 700 | 258 | 16 |
| Full Text Views | 13 | 7 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 29 | 12 | 0 |