Save

Šeḫ Muḥammad Aršad al-Banjarī and the Application of Critical Theological Interpretations to Local Traditions in Banjar Region, Indonesia

in Al-Bayan: Journal of Qur'an and Hadith Studies
Autor:innen:
Wardani Associate Professor, Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Humaniora, Universitas Islam Negeri Antasar Banjarmasin Banjarmasin Indonesia

Search for other papers by Wardani in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7844-0626
,
Mazlan Ibrahim Associate Professor, Fakulti Pengajian Islam Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Selangor Malaysia

Search for other papers by Mazlan Ibrahim in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0193-1379
, und
Wardatun Nadhiroh Ph.D. Researcher, School of Philosophy, Theology, and Religion, College of Arts and Law, University of Birmingham Egbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT UK

Search for other papers by Wardatun Nadhiroh in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4087-0946
Zitierung herunterladen Berechtigungen erhalten

Optionen für den Zugriff

Nutzen Sie bitte eine der untenstehenden Zugriffsmöglichkeiten, um den vollständigen Artikel zu lesen.

Institutszugang

Melden Sie sich mit Open Athens, Shibboleth oder Ihren institutionellen Anmeldedaten an.

Über Institut einloggen

Kauf

Sofortzugang erwerben (PDF-Download und unbegrenzter Online-Zugang):

36,93 €

Weitere Zugriffsmöglichkeiten

Auf DeepDyve mieten
Token einlösen

Abstract

It is undeniable that Religion and tradition have been a highly discussed discourse from the past up to the present day. Interpretation of the Qurʾan is one essential aspect of religion that serves not only as a way of understanding its doctrines, but also as a media controlling local beliefs and practices. This article is aimed at analyzing Šeḫ Muḥammad Aršad’s interpretation of theology-verses quoted to support his theological ideas in his Tuḥfat al-Rāġibīn. Employing trans-disciplinary approaches consisting of Quran interpretation as distinction between interpretation (tafsīr) and application (taṭbīq), and post-colonial criticism of the high-low tradition category, it concludes that first, Šeḫ Aršad’s treatment of the Qurʾanic verses does not prove that he freely interpreted the Qurʾan the way he wanted, but he applied the given verse-interpretation, and this method constitutes a partial interpretation of theology-verses; second, that such use interpretation method, in his perceived innovations, coupled by his position in the Sultanate of Banjar, was projected to purify, the perspective of Ahl al-Sunna wa-l-Jamāʾa, from some local traditions, such as manyanggar banua and mambuang pasilih.

Kennzahlen

Insgesamt Letzte 365 Tage In den letzten 30 Tagen
Aufrufe von Kurzbeschreibungen 635 159 15
Gesamttextansichten 112 9 0
PDF-Downloads 262 14 0