The Crisis of Logic and the (In)stability of Science
Proclus and his Reception in Nicholas of Cusa
In: The International Journal of the Platonic TraditionSearch for other papers by Paolo Colizzi in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is 1) to focus on the last section of the In Parmenidem, analyzing Proclus’ reflection on the relationship between the First God and what he calls the “axioms of contradiction”, accompanied by an attempt to harmonize in a subordinate sense the Aristotelian perspective with the Platonic one; 2) to analyze the reception of this idea in Nicholas of Cusa, the first Latin author to be systematically influenced by the In Parmenidem. It will be possible to show how Cusanus develops a perspective that, on the one hand, finds its explicit antecedent in Proclus and, on the other, how he radicalizes Proclus’ perspective, developing theoretical tensions that we can find unsystematically in Proclus’ own thought. Proclus is aware that the Principle of all reality—and of science itself—must be conceived as in itself unknowable. At the same time, he seeks to save the ability of human knowledge to describe reality. Starting from an idea of the relationship between God and the laws of contradiction close to that of Proclus, Cusanus develops an epistemology that, on the one hand, recognizes the principle of contradiction as the ultimate principle of reason and, on the other hand, comes to the conclusion of a separation between thought and reality outside thought.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Beierwaltes, W. 1964. Deus oppositio oppositorum. Nicolaus Cusanus, De visione Dei. XIII. Salzburger Jahrbuch für Philosophie 8, 175-185.
-
Beierwaltes, W. 1965. Proklos: Grundzüge seiner Metaphysik, Frankfurt Am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.
-
Beierwaltes, W. 1970. Cusanus und Proklos. Zum neuplatonischen Ursprung des non aliud. In: G. Santinello (ed.). Nicolò Cusano agli inizi del mondo moderno, Atti del Congresso internazionale in occasione del V centenario della morte di Nicolò Cusano, Firenze: Sansoni, 137-140.
-
Beierwaltes, W. 2000. Centrum Tocius Vite. Zur Bedeutung von Proklos’ Theologia Platonis im Denken des Cusanus. In: A.-Ph. Segonds—C. Steel (eds.). Proclus et la Théologie Platonicienne: actes du colloque international de Louvain (13-16 mai 1998) en l’honneur de H.D. Saffrey et L.G. Westerink, Leuven-Paris: Leuven University Press—Les Belles Lettres, 629-651.
-
Berti, E. 1975. Il principio di non contraddizione come criterio supremo di significanza nella metafisica aristotelica. In: Id., Studi aristotelici, L’Aquila: L. U. Japadre Editore, 61-88.
-
Bormann, K. (ed.) 1986. Cusanus-Texte III. Marginalien 2. Proclus Latinus 2.2. Expositio in Parmenidem Platonis, Heidelberg: Winter.
-
Colizzi, P. 2021. Fra ritorno all’Antico e innovazione. Cusano al crocevia del suo tempo. Giornale Critico di Storia delle Idee 2/2021, 301-314.
-
Cassirer, E. 1927. Individuum und Kosmos in der Philosophie der Renaissance, Leipzig: Teubner.
-
D’mico, C. 2009. La recepción del pensamiento de Proclo en la obra de Nicolás de Cusa. Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía 26, 107-134.
-
Fiamma, A. 2021. Nicholas of Cusa and the Aristotelian Theory of Substance. In: E. Vimercati—V. Zaffino (eds.), Nicholas of Cusa and the Aristotelian Tradition. A Philosophical and Theological Survey, Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter, 147-160.
-
Gersh, S. 2012. Through the Rational to the Supra-Rational. Four Criteria of Non-Discursive Thinking in Medieval Platonism. In: A. Musco (ed.), Universalità della Ragione. Pluralità delle Filosofie nel Medioevo. XII Congresso Internazionale di Filosofia Medievale, Palermo, 17-22 settembre 2007, vol. I, Palermo: Officina di Studi Medievali, 125-147.
-
Gersh, S. 2014. Nicholas of Cusa. In: Id. (ed.), Interpreting Proclus: from Antiquity to Renaissance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 318-349.
-
Halfwassen, J. 1995. Sur la limitation du principe de contradiction chez Denys. Diotima 23, 46-50.
-
Haubst, R. (ed.) 1968. Die Thomas-und Proklos- Exzerpte des « Nicolaus Treverensis » in Codicillus Strassburg 84. Mitteilungen und Forschungsbeiträge der Cusanus- Gesellschaft 1, 17-51.
-
Luna, C. and Segonds, A.-Ph. (eds.) 2021. Proclus, Commentaire sur le Parménide de Platon. Livre VII. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
-
Leinkauf, T. 2006. Nicolaus Cusanus. Eine Einführung, Münster: Aschendorff.
-
Longo, A. 2005. Siriano e i principi della scienza, Napoli: Bibliopolis.
-
Monaco, D. 2010. Deus Trinitas. Dio come non altro nel pensiero di Nicolò Cusano, Roma: Città Nuova.
-
Napoli, V. 2006. Proclo vs. Aristotele sull’assioma della contraddizione. Fieri 4, 249-265.
-
Pasquale, G. 2006. Aristotle and the Principle of Non-Contradiction, Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.
-
Peroli, E. 2022. Niccolò Cusano. La vita, l’opera, il pensiero, Roma: Carocci.
-
Santinello, G. 1966, Proclo nel pensiero di Cusano. In: Id., Saggi sull’“umanesimo” di Proclo, Bologna: Pàtron, 15-50
-
Schwaetzer, H. 2021, Manuductio. Una breve introduzione ai concetti fondamentali del pensiero di Cusano, Il Pensiero 59, 27-50.
-
Secchi, C. 2018, Cusano e Proclo: le mediazioni platoniche. Historia Philosophica 16, 19-45.
-
Steel, C.—Rumbach, F. 1997. The Final Section of Proclus’ Commentary on the Parmenides: A Greek Retroversion of the Latin Translation, with an English Translation by D.G. MacIsaac. Documenti e studi sulla traduzione filosofica medievale 8, 210-267.
-
Steel, C. (ed.) 2007-2009. Procli in Platonis Parmenidem Commentaria, 3 voll., Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Steel, C. (ed.) 1982-1985. Proclus, Commentaire sur le Parménide de Platon. Traduction de Guillaume de Moerebeke, 2 voll., Leuven-Leiden: Leuven University Press.
-
Steel, C. 1996. La théorie des formes et la providence: Proclus critique d’Aristote et des stoïciens. In: A. Motte—J. Denooz (eds.), Aristotelica secunda. Mélanges offerts à Christian Rutten, Liège: C.I.P.L., 241-254.
-
Steel, C. 2003. Beyond the principle of contradiction? Proclus “Parmenides” and the Origin of Negative Theology. In: M. Pickavé (ed.), Die Logik des Transzendentalen: Festschrift für Jan A. Aertsen zum 65. Geburtstag, Berlin—New York: De Gruyter, 581-599.
-
Steel, C. 1999. ‘Negatio Negationis’: Proclus on the First Lemma of the First Hypothesis of the Parmenides. In: J.J. Cleary (ed.), Traditions of Platonism. Essays in Honour of John Dillon, Aldershot-Brookfield: Ashgate, 351-368.
-
Strobel, B. 2006. Einige Vorschläge zur Wiederherstellung des griechischen Texts des Schlussteils von Proklos’ Parmenides-Kommentar. In: M. Perkams—R.M. Piccione (eds.), Proklos. Methode, Seelenlehre, Metaphysik. Akten der Konferenz in Jena am 18.-20. September 2003, Leiden-Boston: Brill, 98-113.
-
Van Velthoven, T. 1977. Gottesschau und menschliche Kreativität. Studien zur Erkenntnislehre des Nikolaus von Kues, Leiden: Brill.
-
Vansteemberghe, E. 1928. Quelques lectures de jeunesse de Nicolas de Cues. Archives de histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 3, 275-284.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 631 | 211 | 10 |
| Full Text Views | 24 | 9 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 332 | 28 | 1 |
The Crisis of Logic and the (In)stability of Science
Proclus and his Reception in Nicholas of Cusa
In: The International Journal of the Platonic TraditionSearch for other papers by Paolo Colizzi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is 1) to focus on the last section of the In Parmenidem, analyzing Proclus’ reflection on the relationship between the First God and what he calls the “axioms of contradiction”, accompanied by an attempt to harmonize in a subordinate sense the Aristotelian perspective with the Platonic one; 2) to analyze the reception of this idea in Nicholas of Cusa, the first Latin author to be systematically influenced by the In Parmenidem. It will be possible to show how Cusanus develops a perspective that, on the one hand, finds its explicit antecedent in Proclus and, on the other, how he radicalizes Proclus’ perspective, developing theoretical tensions that we can find unsystematically in Proclus’ own thought. Proclus is aware that the Principle of all reality—and of science itself—must be conceived as in itself unknowable. At the same time, he seeks to save the ability of human knowledge to describe reality. Starting from an idea of the relationship between God and the laws of contradiction close to that of Proclus, Cusanus develops an epistemology that, on the one hand, recognizes the principle of contradiction as the ultimate principle of reason and, on the other hand, comes to the conclusion of a separation between thought and reality outside thought.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 631 | 211 | 10 |
| Full Text Views | 24 | 9 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 332 | 28 | 1 |
