Möchten Sie über diese Zeitschrift informiert bleiben? Klicken Sie bitte auf die Buttons, um unsere Alerts zu abonnieren.
Möchten Sie über diese Zeitschrift informiert bleiben? Klicken Sie bitte auf die Buttons, um unsere Alerts zu abonnieren.
This article discusses the problem of the ineffable in Damascius’ treatises De principiis and In Parmenidem. I argue that the ineffable—which is the ultimate principle proposed by Damascius—is also the theme that underlies the whole frame of the reality, in his perspective. Each level of reality that he discusses comes into play on the background of the original attempt to suggest the ineffable principle. Each of them—One, unified, soul, material forms, matter and sensible realm—tries to approximate and suggest the previous level and thus, eventually, the ineffable itself. Consequently, each level of reality develops its own degree of ineffability, and therefore presents itself to our mind in an aporetical manner. It is impossible for our mind to reveal in an exhaustive and noncontradictory fashion even the levels closest to us. The aporiai that are specific for every part of reality are eventually consequences of the original aporia of an absolute and unique principle that governs everything.
Kauf
Sofortzugang erwerben (PDF-Download und unbegrenzter Online-Zugang):
Institutszugang
Melden Sie sich mit Open Athens, Shibboleth oder Ihren institutionellen Anmeldedaten an.
Persönliche Anmeldung
Melden Sie sich mit Ihrem brill.com-Konto an
Damascius, Traité des premiers principes, 3 vols., ed. L. G. Westerink, French transl. J. Combès, Paris, Les Belles Lettres, 1986-1991.
Damascius, Commentaire du Parménide de Platon, 4 vols. ed. L. G. Westerink, French transl. J. Combès, Paris, Les Belles Lettres, 1995-2003.
Damascius, Problems and Solutions Concerning First Principles, transl. S. Ahbel-Rappe, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2010.
Proclus, In Platonis Parmenidem, ed. V. Cousin, Hildesheim/New York, Olms, 1961.
Proclus, Théologie platonicienne, 6 vol. ed. and French transl. H. D. Saffrey and L. G. Westerink, Paris, Les Belles Lettres, 1968-1997.
Béguin, V. (2013) Ineffable et indicible chez Damascius. Les Études Philosophiques, 4, 553-569.
Butler, E. (2019) Damascian Negativity. Dionysius, 37, 114-133.
Caluori, D. (2017) Aporia and the Limits of Reason and of Language in Damascius. In: G. Karamanolis, V. Politis (eds.), The Aporetic Tradition in Ancient Philosophy, 269-284, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Casas, G. (2019) L’indicible comme principe paradigme néoplatonicien de l’apophatisme. Cahiers philosophiques, 158(3), 9-32.
Combès, J. (1996) Études néoplatoniciennes. Grenoble, Millon.
Dillon, J. (1996) Damascius on the Ineffable. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 78, 120-129.
Franke, W. (2004) Of the Ineffable: Aporetics of the Notion of an Absolute Principle. Arion, 12(1), 19-39.
Gersh, S. (2014) Being Different. More Neoplatonism after Derrida. Leiden/Boston, Brill.
Greig, J. (2021) The First Principle in Late Neoplatonism: A Study of the One’s Causality in Proclus and Damascius. Leiden/Boston, Brill.
Lavaud, L. (2007) L’ineffable et l’impossible: Damascius au regard de la déconstruction. Philosophie, 96, 46-66.
Metry-Tresson, C. (2012) L’aporie ou l’expérience des limites de la pensée dans le Péri Archôn de Damaskios. Leiden/Boston, Brill.
Napoli, V. (2008) Ἐ πέκεινα τοῦ ἑνός. Il principio totalmente ineffabile tra dialettica ed esegesi in Damascio. Catania, Officina di Studi Medievali.
Napoli, V. (2018) Aspetti sacrali e anagogici del “meraviglioso” in Damascio. Una chiave di lettura. Peitho, 9, 121-155.
Pascalau, G. (2019) Damaskios: Das Absolute ‘jenseits des Unsagbaren’. In: E. Plevrakis, M. Rohstock (eds.), Grundlegung des Absoluten? Paradigmen aus der Geschichte der Metaphysik, 117-147, Heidelberg, Universitätsverlag Winter.
Pitteloud, L. (2022) Beyond the Principle of Non-Contradiction: Damascius on the Ineffable. Rhizomata, 307-338.
Rappe, S. (2000) Reading Neoplatonism: Non-Discursive Thinking in the Texts of Plotinus, Proclus and Damascius. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Rappe, S. (2010) Damascius on the Third Hypothesis of the Parmenides. In: J. Turner, K. Corrigan (eds.), Plato’s Parmenides and Its Heritage, vol. 2, 143-156, Atlanta, Society of Biblical Literature.
Steel, C. (1978) The Changing Self. A Study on the Soul in Later Neoplatonism: Iamblichus, Damascius and Priscianus. Bruxelles, Verhandelingen van de Koninklijke Academie voor Wetenschappen.
Van Riel, G. (2002) ‘N’essayons pas de compter l’intelligible sur les doigts’. Damascius et les principes de la limite et de l’illimité. Philosophie antique, 2, 199-219.
Van Riel, G. (2010) Damascius. In: L. P. Gerson (ed.), The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity, vol. II, 667-696, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Vlad, M. (2016) Defying Words: Damascius and the Travail of the Unsayable. Chora. Revue d’études anciennes et médiévales, 14, 223-250.
Vlad, M. (2017) Stepping into the Void: Proclus and Damascius on Approaching the First Principle. International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 11, 44-68.
Vlad, M. (2019) Damascius et l’ineffable. Récit de l’impossible discours. Paris, Vrin.
| Insgesamt | Letzte 365 Tage | In den letzten 30 Tagen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aufrufe von Kurzbeschreibungen | 610 | 169 | 33 |
| Gesamttextansichten | 18 | 7 | 0 |
| PDF-Downloads | 292 | 22 | 2 |
This article discusses the problem of the ineffable in Damascius’ treatises De principiis and In Parmenidem. I argue that the ineffable—which is the ultimate principle proposed by Damascius—is also the theme that underlies the whole frame of the reality, in his perspective. Each level of reality that he discusses comes into play on the background of the original attempt to suggest the ineffable principle. Each of them—One, unified, soul, material forms, matter and sensible realm—tries to approximate and suggest the previous level and thus, eventually, the ineffable itself. Consequently, each level of reality develops its own degree of ineffability, and therefore presents itself to our mind in an aporetical manner. It is impossible for our mind to reveal in an exhaustive and noncontradictory fashion even the levels closest to us. The aporiai that are specific for every part of reality are eventually consequences of the original aporia of an absolute and unique principle that governs everything.
| Insgesamt | Letzte 365 Tage | In den letzten 30 Tagen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aufrufe von Kurzbeschreibungen | 610 | 169 | 33 |
| Gesamttextansichten | 18 | 7 | 0 |
| PDF-Downloads | 292 | 22 | 2 |