Save

The Nature, Ethics, and Politics of Uncivil Obedience

In: Journal of Pacifism and Nonviolence
Author:
Jennifer Kling Associate Professor of Philosophy, Director of the Center for Legal Studies, University of Colorado Colorado Springs, Colorado Springs, CO, US

Search for other papers by Jennifer Kling in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3585-3684
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€36.93

Abstract

Uncivil obedience, also sometimes called malicious compliance, has the potential to be a galvanizing force for political change. Historically, it played a key role in many 20th century labor movements, and is still used today by both individuals and more organized activist groups. Despite this, uncivil obedience is less often a topic of philosophical discussion than its more well-known cousin, civil disobedience. In particular, uncivil obedience’s relationship to violence is almost entirely unexplored. In this paper, I outline the necessary conditions for some act to count as uncivil obedience, discuss its relationship to violence, and then present the conditions that must be met for uncivil obedience to be justified. Like other forms of protest and resistance, uncivil obedience has normative limits; there are things we ought not do with it, even in the name of fighting for a better world.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 2308 516 48
Full Text Views 75 37 2
PDF Views & Downloads 154 94 4